• JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yea but Greco-Roman paganism didn’t treat women as owned property of men like the Abrahamic faiths do. It’s not necessarily religion in total, it’s that the current dominant religions are extremely controlling and more about self-oppression for eventual reward than guidelines for a good life like most pagan sects

      • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Greco-Roman paganism didn’t treat women as owned property of men like the Abrahamic faiths do

        Yes they fucking did lmao. Greek women had absolutely no rights

      • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        right, which means it isn’t “religion” as a concept which is the problem.

        Also, sexuality is pretty commonly open in Hinduism, which is a pretty huge current religion.

        It isn’t a problem with “religion”.

        • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I was going to say, isn’t the Kama Sutra a Hindu text? We have a bunch of sex positions that may have been lost to time if it weren’t for the Hindu religion.