• alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    The way they feed you information is patronizingly slow, and while I’m not expecting a widely cited academic paper published in a reputable journal, Youtube essays are one step below shitposts on internet forums in trustworthiness and academic rigor.

    • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Guess we’re watching different video essays, then. Most are edutainment at best, true. But there are *soy many with cited sources on youtube.

      • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        I gave them the text as published on the anarchist library, but they didn’t seem to appreciate that either. It’s almost like they just don’t want to learn history that isn’t their revisionist version of it.

          • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            The frustrating thing is that most of it was CIA propaganda at one point in time, it just happened to also be true, which made it much more effective propaganda. It’s a big gift the USSR gave to anti-communists.