• ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Waiting for the right to panic about stats they have been trying to hide for 30 years. Or they will force a recall vote to remove the Surgeon General.

  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 days ago

    Okay, so almost two mass shootings per day is the line at which a US official is willing to speak out against gun violence.

    Good to know.

    I would have said one mass shooting a week is really pushing it, but that’s why they’re the surgeon general.

    Line in the sand: roughly two mass shootings everyday.

    • Granbo's Holy Hotrod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      I read a headline yesterday that a toddler has been injured by firearms every day for the last two years in the US. But abortion is the problem. As an 80s kid, no disrespect, but guns are gay.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      Only two? We passed 2 a few years back. I’ve seen 8 but if the average isn’t 4 I’ll be surprised.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Yup, the average for US mass shootings, as in multiple victims of gun violence from a single shooting, in 2024 up to June is 1.5 per day, or about one mass shooting in the US every 16 hours.

        You might be thinking of regular shootings, where only one person is injured, which is way more common and includes suicides and accidents.

  • avattar@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 days ago

    I’m here thinking: “but gunshots are not a disease? Wait, gunshots ARE treated at hospitals, and probably take a lot more resources to treat than, say, a fever. So it does fall within his purview in my uninformed opinion.”

    And then I thought “But why are people shooting each other? Maybe he should have declared a mental health crisis?”

    So to conclude, I think it would be more productive to treat the mental health issue, and gun crimes should reduce. Of course, reducing the number and availability of guns would help too, but seems a harder problem to tackle.

    • Bilbo_Haggins@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      This is actually the main policy stance of the Liberal Gun Club. That we’re spending all this time regulating guns and ignoring/underaddressing the root causes like mental health issues, domestic violence, toxic masculinity, income inequality, poverty, etc.

      Not to say that guns shouldn’t be regulated to some extent, but with the way mental health is in America I’m pretty sure we’d just see a spike in knife and baseball bat crime and suicide by hanging if we somehow magically got rid of guns.

      https://theliberalgunclub.com/about-us/root-cause-mitigation-2/

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        8 days ago

        there’s mentally ill people in every country but only in america do they have easy access to firearms with hardly any red tape.

          • Sprawlie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            Canada says “High”. we don’t have a functional mental health solution and it’s only gotten worse. And while we do have gun crime, it’s nowhere near the same as our southern neighbour because of our gun restrictions and we don’t Fetishize gun culture.

            Mental health IS part of the problem. But the insane culture around owning firearms in the US directly leads to the prevalence of gun crime.