Windows 11 is getting out of hand with its push for advertisments, frankly - remember the recent full-screen pop-up to persuade users to install Edge or other Microsoft services? Then another advertisment was placed in the Start menu, and now Microsoft has finally worn my temper thin - with a new Game Pass ad coming to the Settings app.

This will likely arrive in the July update for Windows 11, or at least it’s almost certain to do so. It was present in the latest preview update Microsoft just released for the OS (and quickly paused due to a bug, but that’s another story). It’s also worth noting that the ad has been present in earlier test versions of Windows 11.

  • Grippler@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    238
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    I wholeheartedly believe that all forma of unsolicited or public advertising should be completely banned. Nothing good comes from it, it is only a nuisance to everyone.

    • sunzu@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      79
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      But have you thought about a legal person’s right to fuck your eyes and brains?!

      Also, what about their freedom of speech… Shit lord

        • sunzu@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          5 months ago

          Because they are not “ads”

          They use the same propaganda tactics that governments in 20th century perfected

          Gets people going

          • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            5 months ago

            Imagine If I worked for Kellogs and I hired a guy to follow you and yell about how good corn flakes are every time you look at your phone, every time your TV shows go on a break, and every time you pass a billboard in your car, or a marquee on a building. Even if we assume that person does nothing else illegal somehow, that could easily still be harassment, which is definitely not free speech.

            • sunzu@kbin.run
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Tell that to the courts that’s who decided this degeneracy is acceptable.

              Don’t get me started on them spying

              • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                5 months ago

                I’ve long know I wouldn’t make a good lawyer because you can’t say things like “Listen here you little shit” even when you’re right.

                • sunzu@kbin.run
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Sure way to get some time in the hole haha

                  When corruption is the process, no amount of good argument will win tho.

                • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  I’ve been called a sovereign citizen as an insult, though I’m just a voluntarist (not sure if ancap or generic anarchist), and that sometimes was past the point of me saying

                  things like “Listen here you little shit”

                  but I’ll admit “the society” wasn’t persuaded. Though sometimes it felt that possibly more than half of the people present agreed, but were confident that the majority doesn’t.

                  It’s actually a very good propaganda strategy - even if most people disagree with you (as the bad guy), what’s important is that they believe that others agree and thus keep their heads down.

                  • sunzu@kbin.run
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    I’ve been called a sovereign citizen

                    Political operatives on socials use this as a smear when they can’t counter with a reasonable, factual argument.

                    “Ohh you don’t wan to submit to some corpo/state’s idiotic policy, what are you a sovereign citizen”

                    No, just an adult person who pays taxes and has common sense

                    I don’t think these people are a “real” imho

    • 9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      5 months ago

      They should, but that’s never going to happen unless political lobbying is made very illegal (like life ruining and business bankrupting illegal, not slap on the wrist, cost of business illegal)

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      We should be able to charge them for ad time. You want to paint an advertisement on my car you have to pay me. Why should it be any different when you want to put ads on my work computer screen when I’m working with clients?

      • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 months ago

        I get what you’re saying but that still gives them unsolicited permission to post ads in the first place.

        I want an operating system, not an ad system that also happens to be an operating system

    • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      5 months ago

      And it’s not like w11 is free, the price of a PC with Windows installed comes with its’ license’s costs. It’s not told to the consumer so they won’t even know they are using a product they paid for, for them it’s what a clean basic PC looks like. And that’s what prevents many to care about it the same way they can be frustrated by a paid streaming plan with ads. To take is as a given, and shifting the Overtone’s window of fucked up services even further.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I don’t like solving things with regulation, because that’s always a victory in one battle making the enemy stronger for all the following ones.

        But doing this EU-style, like browser choice, only with operating systems, can be a solution.

        People love cheap and easy things. That’s how social media won over normal web. Seeing the choice between “install Fedora for freeeeeee” and “install Windows for 20$” significant amount will choose the former.

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Doesn’t quite cut it.

            Now if there’s no other option or if the variant with Linux is labeled as “other” or “no OS”, and listed separately, normies still choose Windows 99% of cases. Sometimes they pirate it.

            They should have a clear choice in the store from a few OSes with details. Summaries with screenshots will do.

      • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Because they own that wall. The owner of a wall (or poster space for that matter) can do whatever.

          • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            Oh I own my computer, and I don’t get ads as a result. It’s not impossible. A Linux DE does not have ads and your browser can block them with various methods.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              Yup. If you use Windows, you need to accept what Microsoft does, because they control the OS. If you use Linux, you only need to accept what the software you install does, and there are a lot of options to select from.

              Feel free to complain when Microsoft does something stupid, but don’t expect Microsoft to do anything about it. If you want control, use something that preserves that control.

    • Nyanix@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      Especially in a paid service, like why do I pay for these services if you’re still going to advertise, track, or datamine? I know the answer is greed, why profit off of one option when you can profit off of all of them, but I, the consumer, am fed up with the customer abuse.

      • Grippler@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        A regulatory change would obviously need to prevent them from hiding that kind in intentionally too long legalese TOS. It has to be a clear single acknowledge, not obfuscated or bundled with functionality.

    • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      But how will the wealth addled convince us pleblians to spend money on worthless garbage? Or convince us that we’re ugly and not good enough so we buy their products? Oh the humanity!

      In all seriousness, advertising has had way too much of an influence on our culture and it needs to be properly regulated. I’m sick of being negged by beauty product ads.