• Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    5 days ago

    Is 13 to young to work? Is 65 too early to retire? Are you spending too much time on hobbies?

    I want to leave this planet.

    • TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Isn’t a baby playing with blocks them showing their want to work?

      Subscribe to my LinkedIn for more astute money making tips!

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    5 days ago

    “labour shortage”

    When adults are sick and tired of being paid peanuts to work a back breaking 40 to 50 hour job.

    Corporations: So why not look to children who are too inexperienced to understand how much their labour is really worth…?

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      Keep that US bullshit out of this country!

      You may need to understand the American influence that caused the backlash among the WestJet mechanics with their strike, this week.

  • folkrav@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Too young for the concept of doing work in exchange for something? No, I don’t think so. There’s no minimum age to learn how to do something, for the most part, if the interest is there.

    However, those lower-wage jobs tend to be where a lot of the worker rights abuse tends to happen, and I absolutely think it’s way too young for them to realize if/when it’s happening, or to be in a position to properly defend themselves if they do. Sure, parental guidance and all, but let’s say my experience working with all kinds of parents in day camps, as a ski instructor and in elementary schools, didn’t make me very optimistic about a lot of them really being in a position to protect their children at work.

    I’ve also honestly yet to really see it happening where it has 0 impact on their schooling, but that’s rather anecdotal…

    • Icalasari@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      Plus it is going to most affect families too poor to speak up and children of abusive parents who would force them to work

  • alienanimals@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Billionaires don’t work. Why should children?

    Let kids focus on their studies. We need a better educated population, not one where people are trained to work mindless jobs where corporations pay you the least amount possible.

    • Adderbox76@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      We need a better educated populated

      Conservative politics don’t poll well with educated people. An educated population is the very last thing Shmoe needs

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 days ago

    How about having a controversial debate about how much companies, corporations and business owners should pay employees in any job in order to make it so that everyone is capable of paying to keep themselves alive, fulfilled and happy.

  • MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I started working full time during the summer the year I turned 13. I was working for my family’s company and my safety was always the most important thing.

    In the current environment of the exploration of workers I feel that it is unacceptable for children to work for any company other than a family company or a small company that will not exploit them and that will protect them.

    • sunzu@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      a small company that will not exploit them and that will protect them.

      Cute that you believe this

      • nyan@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        6 days ago

        Small companies vary widely in their morals. The best ones might indeed protect and teach, rather than exploit, a young worker. The worst ones . . . are worse than any large company, and you can’t always tell from outside which type you’ve got. And family companies can be just as bad as any other small company, alas.

        • sunzu@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I am sure some employees of mega corps also happy with their treatment too

          The point being is that it is an exception to the general savagery of “legal persons”

        • cygnus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          6 days ago

          Remember that this was YOUR family’s company. Family businesses writ large definitely don’t have a good reputation as far as their non-relative workers are concerned. At least with a megacorporation you can expect some guardrails that will limit their abuses.

          • sunzu@kbin.run
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            megacorporation you can expect some guardrails that will limit their abuses

            i would not expect that tbh but yeah megacorps are serious about managing their liability, they will generally avoid crime unless they can get away with it.

            most small biz owners are too stupid to understand liability so they just do as they please which is generally either a crime or breach of various civil laws and regulations.

        • sunzu@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          At least I know who I am deal with and able to fight the good fight

          It is a lot harder being fucked while living a delusion IMHO

    • snooggums
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Agreed in pricipal because family businesses are frequently how knowledge is passed from generation to generation, but family and small businesses can also exploit and not protect children and still need oversight on safety.

  • Kichae@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    “Are 13 year olds too young to exploit monetarily?”

    “Are 13 year olds too young to take on the glorious privilege of earning their own money?”

    Hey look, it’s propaganda in action, right there on the CBC.

    • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      “Are 13 year olds too young to exploit monetarily?”

      Is 13 too young to work? A Saskatchewan proposal has reignited debate around kids and labour

      Was it hard to quote the actual headline or is it a matter of making the narrative you are attempting to push stronger?

      Reading the article helps as well.

  • PenguinTD@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 days ago

    okay, let me ask the real question:

    • do they also get paid at the same standard(minimum wage, benefit, etc) like other worker?
    • do they also get CPP/EI contribution from employer? And can they take EI benefit when laid off?
    • do they also get to contribute to RRSP/TFSA? TFSA is after 18 currently, so they can’t even save their wage compare to other adult workers.
    • when they do perform well, will they get evaluated and promoted the same way? ie, a 15 yo manager at fast food chain and paid the same wage as a manager.
    • rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I started working at 14 (in Ontario). For my first job:

      • No, there is a “student wage” that is less than minimum wage
      • EI yes, CPP no
      • No
      • Only if there are promotions available at the part-time level (my “promotion” increased my pay by $0.50)

      After 2 years of working there, I got a $0.05 raise. Yes, 5 cents. The biggest increase in my pay came when the minimum wage was increased in Ontario, which also increased the student wage.

      • dankm@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        Since this post is about Saskatchewan, I’ll add that Saskatchewan doesn’t have a student wage, just one minimum wage.

        It also happens to be about $1.20 less than Ontario’s student wage. I like my province, but man does it have its issues.

          • dankm@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            I would have, but my first minimum wage-type job was after high school. I didn’t make enough to pay into CPP, but I don’t know if that’s a universal truth for younger workers or just because I didn’t work more than 10 hours a week.

            Also fun fact, going back go my original comment about wage: Saskatchewan’s October increase to its general minimum wage won’t catch up to Ontario’s current student wage. Things are cheaper here, yes, but things aren’t (much if any) cheaper in Saskatoon or Regina than in London.

            • rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              Is Regina at least better to live in? London is the armpit of Ontario. I hated it there, lol. But there is an excellent shawarma place near the college (Hadi’s).

              Edit: Just found out Hadi’s is closed and there’s a new shawarma place there now. :( Hope Hadi is doing well.

              • dankm@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                I’m probably not the best person to ask. I’ve never lived in Regina, but from visiting it’s similar to Saskatoon, except it has a man-made lake instead of a nice river valley. It’s a nice enough city, but it’s also clearly a government town. As for London, I’ve never been. I have family there, and part of my family moved to Saskatchewan from London over 100 years ago.

      • PenguinTD@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        Exactly, without proper protection and equality for same performance/quality of work, it’s just pure exploitation.

  • sunzu@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 days ago

    Look guys Canada is doing America again

    Why would these little turds NOT make daddy some mother fucking money tho?

  • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    50+ years ago when I was 12, I got my first job at an ice cream/burger stand making 0.75 cents per hour. The only downside was my creepy old boss who took great joy in pinching my non-existent breasts and child-sized ass.

    2 yrs later I started working at the local pizza joint (legal age to work was 14 back then).

    The real problem these days is owners who would abuse the privilege of having kids work for them. I mean you just know that’s gonna happen, esp under Shmoe’s ‘leadership’.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      That is fucked, but I think workers of all ages can be exploited. In my case, working a few different jobs from age 13 to 15 alerted me early to the exploitative behaviour of employers, and I’ve been very diligent in asserting my federal, state, and contractual rights in employment ever since, and to help and insist that co-workers do too.

      In fact, I think this lesson is best learned by child workers, because at that age, the value of the lesson is high, and the potential stakes of asserting ones rights are low, EG as a child, if the child is sacked for asserting their rights, they only lose their pocket money. As an adult out in the wild, this could mean risking their income which pays for rent, family, bills, and other critical expenses.

      • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        I think you forget that women and children still don’t have enough power, at any age, to deny any man what he wants. They still die doing that, or are beaten within an inch of their lives, or are fired/written up for refusing sexual advances, or are put in situations where they’ve received no training but have to run a dangerous machine anyway.

        That is not something any child should ‘have’ to learn.

        How about instead we crack down on the businesses that do shit like that … maybe 1st offense they lose their business … 2nd offense they lose their life.

  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Schooling is mandatory until 18. Any other activity has to not interfere with that. Beyond that, do what ye will.

  • rozodru@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    this doesn’t make a lick of sense. I know 16 year olds who WANT to work and can’t even find jobs because of the foreign temp workers/international students. Saskatchewan wants to allow 13 year olds? why? there’s literally no point. A business that is already more than willing to take advantage of a potential employee is still going to favor some “student” from India over a 13 year old Canadian kid. you can take more advantage of the Indian kid as opposed to the 13 year old Kid.

    This is one massive nothing burger.

    • psvrh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 days ago

      “We clearly haven’t made the working class desperate enough yet. Let’s have immigrants and students fight over jobs to make everything even nastier!”

      I’m sure this won’t in any way result in a huge cohort of angry underemployed young people. No siree.

      I’m also starting to think that businesspeople aren’t the Galtian ubermenchen that they think they are, given that they by and large can’t plan more than six months in advance.