• ahal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    Did the OP say they couldn’t have different views? You must have replied to the wrong comment.

    • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      isn’t that what they implied?

      I’m fine with solumbran seeing the dev’s opinions as “wrong”, I just find how they base their whole view of the project on that single small disagreement makes them seem like a shortsighted dumbass

      • ahal@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        Oh that’s not at all what they implied. They implied you shouldn’t use the project based on the author’s opinions. That’s very different from implying the author isn’t entitled to their opinions.

        Boycotting the software doesn’t infringe on the author’s rights to have a shitty opinion. It’s called consequences for being an asshole.

        • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          They implied you shouldn’t use the project based on the author’s opinions.

          that’s what i said??

          Boycotting the software doesn’t infringe on the author’s rights to have a shitty opinion.

          how am i saying this? i’m saying that the guy is shortsighted for telling people to boycott the software just bc of the dev’s opinions

          i’m not arguing about the arbitary rights of authors, i’m just saying that boycotting isn’t an efficient use of resources