Techie@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoUnpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specificationvivaldi.comexternal-linkmessage-square99fedilinkarrow-up1692arrow-down110cross-posted to: vivaldi_browser@lemmy.mlvivaldi_browser@lemmy.mlnews@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showtechnology@lemmy.worldprivacy@chat.maiion.comtechnology@chat.maiion.comtechnology@feddit.chtechnology@lemmy.mlsysadmin@reddthat.comprogramming@programming.dev
arrow-up1682arrow-down1external-linkUnpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specificationvivaldi.comTechie@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square99fedilinkcross-posted to: vivaldi_browser@lemmy.mlvivaldi_browser@lemmy.mlnews@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showtechnology@lemmy.worldprivacy@chat.maiion.comtechnology@chat.maiion.comtechnology@feddit.chtechnology@lemmy.mlsysadmin@reddthat.comprogramming@programming.dev
minus-squaredarkkite@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agolegally yes they’ve been fined by numerous governments for excessive privacy violations
minus-squarejoe@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoThat’s fair but presumably, since they’re not racking up fines cumulatively, that they are now in accordance with the law… so are you saying that the current level is “reasonable”? Am I misunderstanding you point?
legally yes they’ve been fined by numerous governments for excessive privacy violations
That’s fair but presumably, since they’re not racking up fines cumulatively, that they are now in accordance with the law… so are you saying that the current level is “reasonable”? Am I misunderstanding you point?