And no, I’m not saying don’t vote; I’m saying that there comes a point when voting isn’t going to solve the problem

  • dactylotheca@suppo.fiOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    So you’re saying a “moderate liberal” who supports genocide is more of a fascist than a “tankie”?

    I’m not saying anything like that: you’re saying that.

    What I was saying is that fascism is its own kind of ideology, and although yes it’s been pretty fluid over the years, the hallmarks are authoritarian capitalism, emphasis on private enterprise, social Darwinism (supporting “the strong” and loathing “the weak”), misogyny, and the hatred and outright murder of the Other (jews, foreigners, LGBT+ people, people with the wrong religion, people with no religion, whoever).

    Lots of folks fit the mold even without necessarily realizing it.

    Would you call them “tankie” or fascist?

    A tankie is an authoritarian communist. Your hypothetical person doesn’t seem to support communism nor be a leftist, and it’s kinda hard to say if they’re a fascist or not just based on what you wrote. Fascist-adjacent maybe but 🤷

    • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Don’t bother. These people LOVE rewriting your narrative. It’s the only way they can win arguments.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      What I was saying is that fascism is its own kind of ideology, and although yes it’s been pretty fluid over the years, the hallmarks are authoritarian capitalism, emphasis on private enterprise, social Darwinism (supporting “the strong” and loathing “the weak”), misogyny, and the hatred and outright murder of the Other (jews, foreigners, people with the wrong religion, people with no religion, whoever).

      Well, if you lump misogyny in with other bigotry like it should be…

      That’s a pretty good description of “moderate Dems” and Joe Biden’s entire 2024 campaign specifically.

      My point is, breaking it all up into every slice getting it’s own special name is ridiculous and just confuses people.

      But I don’t think you’re going to magically start understanding any of this if I keep replying.

      • dactylotheca@suppo.fiOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        My point is, breaking it all up into every slice getting it’s own special name is ridiculous and just confuses people.

        You seriously think it’s less confusing to use a well-established political term incorrectly for everything that’s even a little bit authoritarian, and that calling different systems by their own and well-established terms is confusing? This is just your version of reich-wingers calling everyone to the left of Goebbels a “socialist” because they can’t be bothered to learn about politics.

        And I’m supposedly the dim one here?

        • Infynis
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          This is just your version of reich-wingers calling everyone to the left of Goebbels a “socialist” because they can’t be bothered to learn about politics.

          That’s exactly what it is. And if they weren’t so obviously a troll, they could have actually made an interesting point.

          The difference is that the meaning of words actually matters to people on the left. While, yes, the right does benefit from easier organization because they can all just yell the same thing, the reason is because they all know that the real point in bigotry and cruelty. The specifics don’t matter as long as the Party wins, and the Other suffers

          This is why you see so many “people” making both sides arguments. You can convince people on the left of things, because we care about words, so these arguments only harm our candidates, even if, on the surface, they seem balanced

          • dactylotheca@suppo.fiOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            And if they weren’t so obviously a troll

            Is it obvious? Honest question, I can’t tell. I assumed they’re just a regular person with very stupid opinions

            • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              They’re a well known troll. Yes. They constantly misinterpret your point purposefully so they can win the argument. It’s like building straw men out of the words of others.

              Most of them do this.

            • Infynis
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              I mean, they’re literally trying to dilute the meaning fascism, which is sure to only benefit fascists. And they’re basically doing the both sides thing as well. The goal seems to be to convince us that Biden is just as bad as Trump, which is not even close to the truth, and, as I said, only hurts the left, because it convinced people not to vote. If they’re not a troll, they’re a sucker regurgitating rightwing cons

              • dactylotheca@suppo.fiOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                I mean, they’re literally trying to dilute the meaning fascism, which is sure to only benefit fascists.

                Oh yeah they definitely are, I just didn’t take it as trolling, but as a stupid person having stupid opinions and saying stupid things. Not that it makes a difference in the end, an idjit is an idjit