I blame rtxn@lemmy.world’s comment for giving me this idea.

    • Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      This promotes pedophilia.

      Idk why so many grown nerds insist on sexualizing little girls.

      Edit: wow turns out this instance is full of pedophiles. Gross.

      • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I’ve seen this image pop up now and then for like 10+ years as a meme in the Linux community and never not once did I think this.

        Obviously if that’s a confirmed intention behind it, then it’s not okay, but I think you’re overthinking it, it’s just how anime designs are, the characters often look agelessly young.

        These look like pretty average anime characters to me and don’t strike me as implying something problematic in the slightest.

        Idk I’m an outside observer to weeb shit, but that’s how I always interpreted it at least.

        • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          That is not ok either. Children adult sexual or romantic relationships are not ok because of the power dynamic. Both of legal rights and emotional and mental maturities.

          • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            Weird how none of these arguments show up on images of hetero teen romance.

            • Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              Doesnt matter if theyre gay/straight, this is very obviously sexualizing minors. The skirts blowing up is a dead giveaway.

              • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                Good point, with hetero teen romance the guy usually isn’t even wearing a skirt.

            • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              This isn’t even an image of lesbian teen romance tbh. Its penned for the viewers interest instead of candid scene of two kids in love

          • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            The girls in the picture appear to be minors though? I never suggested an age difference??? Wtf…

        • user@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          If you’re an adult, and you’re interested in children’s romance thats the same issue. In fact, all content directed towards older audences featuring this kind of stuff, is directed to, and made by pedos.

    • Yuri addict@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Woudnt it make sense for computers in city 17 running something like RedstarOS so that they can see what every single citizen is doing

    • AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I’ll fix it up in a bit, but I made it on my phone because I was in the process of re-installing Debian on my potato laptop, and it felt like blasphemy to make it on my gaming laptop (which is currently Windows only until I get another SSD for it), lol.

      EDIT: fixed. Mind you, it’s still not good