• gramathy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    187
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    The difference is Biden unpopularity is due to uncertainty while trumps is due to EXTREME certainty that he’s a piece of garbage

    • Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      131
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Biden unpopularity is due to uncertainty

      Which I don’t understand. I’m certain Biden won’t institute project 2025 so the choice should be obvious.

      • Neato@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        58
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        Worst case scenario for Biden is he’s mostly absent and his cabinet has to guide him through policies making the Democratic party mostly in control.

        Which is pretty much exactly what Trump’s first term was adding in a lot of grift and pointless spite.

        • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          4 months ago

          And while there are exceptions (looking at you Garland), most of Biden’s team are pretty solid. For example, I would keep Lena Khan exactly where she is regardless of which Democrat is in charge. He’s got a lot more young smart staff than he gets credit for.

        • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          If you narrow your scope to just the presidency maybe. The real worst case scenario is he completely fails to run an effective campaign and creates a huge red wave sweeping a big group of fascists into power.

          • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            He doesn’t need a wave of them. He just needs to let this one in and it’s all over.

            Again, though, see how successful humphries was in 68. Don’t change horses.

            • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Don’t change horses.

              When the horse is dead you will not ride anywhere with it, period.

              At least since half a year serious people talk about the fact that Biden is becoming too old for office and shows dementia. The DNC had a good year and quite frankly they should have already planned Bidens succession the moment he got into office. It was clear on Jan 6 that they need a new generation that can inspire and has the strength to fight against the Reps.

              Now with every week passing Biden will show more and more that he is an old man whose mental capacities are diminishing at an alarming rate. Staying on this horse is a guaranteed win for the Republicans. Heck, even if Biden was voted in, he’ll die of natural causes or become a vegetable within the next year. This will be a prime moment for the Reps to tear apart whatever Dem administration would try to emerge from that.

              The only solution is a change of generation in the DNC. The old cabal will hand the nation over to fascism otherwise.

            • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              I think there is a world of difference between a Trump presidency with a democratic house and senate and a Republican supermajority. While both of these are unlikely, how close we are to one or the other will make a big difference in how effective the fascist takeover will be.

              I personally think Trump is likely to win no matter who the candidate but having a stronger candidate will have a meaningful effect on other races that matter greatly.

              Humphrey is only a single data point. We can’t draw much of a conclusion from a single event. Maybe Humphrey lost due to the nomination process but I think it’s more likely he was just a weaker candidate. Particularly regarding his pro-Vietnam war stance which was very controversial at the time.

      • rayyy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Uncertainty my ass. Joe Biden is running on an excellent record. He is running on his policies.

      • dariusj18@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        4 months ago

        Disclaimer this is very unlikely.

        I have seen enough people grow older and senile and start acting totally out of character. People who I would have called progressive start supporting Trump because of old man brain.

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          Just depends what news channel they watch all day I know old people on both sides blindly taking in whatever fox/MSN/CNN tell them. Fox ones are consistently shittier but I’ve heard a few pretty bad takes coming out of the other ones too.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      There’s nothing uncertain about Biden at this point. It’s a matter of being in denial or anger.

      • astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        4 months ago

        I think what they’re getting at is that we’re uncertain the extent age will affect his duties. Will his cabinet and other advisors be really “in control,” or will Biden insist on his way forcing others to kowtow. It is certain that the dude is old as hell and if it were he alone, he would be incapable of the job. Since there’s a staff and a ton of advisors, the degree of control they have is, well, uncertain.

        • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          It’s already clear that the extent is large and growing, whether it’s dementia or Parkinson’s doesn’t really matter. He’s effectively a puppet now, and it’s not going to get better. He has minor slip ups in the completely controlled environment they try to keep him in. It’s denial to pretend it won’t get worse, or it’s not actually that bad.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s too bad there’s no plan-b if he does actually get impaired for real during his administra-- oh wait. There is.

        And she’d only be more awesome if she dragged an eligible AOC in as her vice. Asses kicked, names taken.