• Passerby6497@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Because you don’t want to leave fingerprints behind when you unplug something on camera.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Actually, it could be. That could be considered vandalism (you’re intentionally making unauthorized modifications to equipment to prevent it from working as expected) which is illegal.

        But this is New York, so who knows if they would even enforce that.

          • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            Oh, I guess if you can just plug it back in, that just invalidates the downtime that was caused or data being lost.

            Being able to undo vandalism doesn’t make it suddenly not vandalism.

            • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              It’s not vandalism. Vandalism is destruction of property (physically destroying it). Unplugging something that was designed to be unplugged is absolutely not vandalism.

    • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      You’re significantly overestimating the police response to a non-vandalism.

      Edit: In nyc, they don’t even finger print for an actual vandalism…

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      They use fingerprints for murder cases, not camera unplugging cases.

      Also, this lady now has a job and you’re talking about ruining her job.