At least one donor who attended the event and listened to Mr. Schiff’s remarks said he left dejected, believing that Mr. Biden’s chances of winning were now slim and that they should concentrate giving their time and money to downballot candidates in the hopes of salvaging something for the party.
I wonder how many prospective/Democrat candidates the party starved for funding and soundbytes that actually dropped out or stepped aside?
in the hopes of salvaging something for the party.
one would hope that salvaging something for the fucking country is what should be first on their minds.
i understand the sentence is second party reinterpretation, but it is still funny. or sad. or something.
This is legit a leopards ate my face moment for Democrats. We need a new candidate!! Like who? One of those guys we told to get the fuck out of the way!
Frankly, I’d kill for the Dems to pour money and resources into down ballot races.
There go the Democrats, shooting themselves in the foot again.
It’s only fair since the Republicans got to shoot themselves in the ear
Crooks on crooks crimes have always been the Republican way.
No the Republicans shot themselves in the foot, and the Democrats took it as a challenge, and shot themselves in the head.
In this thread: people who don’t know how poorly this went every other time they switched.
Correlation isn’t causation, the switches happened because they were doing poorly
One time the switch happened because the popular candidate was assassinated.
One time it was partially because of, and partially the cause of the Civil War. (Contest only resolved after Southern delegates walked out)
One time it was because neither candidate could get the support of the KKK. No that’s not a joke.
And another time it was because of the civil rights act. The guy who ended up causing the contest really, really hated it.
In every single case, the party that had a contested convention lost the election. Generally by a pretty wide margin.
do they know we automatically lose Nevada, Georgia and Wisconsin if we lose Biden/Harris?
I can’t fathom the circular firing squad mentality at work here.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed, civility
Grow a fucking spine
why do you only censor one side of the argument? I didn’t start the shit talk.
Removing what’s reported.
“the nazis were just doing their jobs man.”
There are no rules preventing Democrats from changing their nominee. The Heritage Foundation is full of shit and you’re agreeing with them because you like their position (keep Biden).
There aren’t rules against changing a nominee. There are rules about being on state ballots for the presidential election, and those rules vary from state to state.
Just because you were not aware of that does not make it untrue.
Yes, and none of them are a problem because the dates haven’t passed yet and the parties choose their nominees. Find an actual law that makes nominating someone else a problem, don’t just repeat something you heard on social media.
The bogus right-wing legal battle to keep Joe Biden on the ballot
Removed by mod
Removed, civility
Removed, civility.
This isn’t like other elections in the past. But at the same time there is no clear full proof solution for another person to take the wheels. They should do whatever it takes to make sure Trump and Trumpism is defeated long term.
Trump is only a symptom of a dysfunctional system. Whether it goes by the name of trump or it goes by the name of something completely different, there will always be a boogeyman to scare voters for them to remain in power. Democrats will provide a boogeyman for their supporters and Republicans will provide a boogeyman for their supporters. All in an effort for the duopoly to stay in power, and keep any outside threads at bay
This is another “both sides are bad” argument; while partially true, the Republicans clearly are much worse.
Thanks for proving his point.
I didn’t “prove” anything, nor was there an attempt to prove anything. Your reading comprehension needs work.
Boogeymode activated. Discard argumentation engage fearmongering.
Aaaaaand you get downvoted.
People don’t actually realize why there’s so much support for Trump. A lot of the public is tired of the gasligjting, bullshit, and lies that establishment politics has brought them for the last ~70 years.
A lot of the public is tired of the gasligjting, bullshit, and lies that establishment politics has brought them for the last ~70 years.
Yes and Trump would (and already has) brought far more of that than we’ve ever had to stomach before. Your point is straight out of 2016, wake the fuck up.
I didn’t say that Trump didn’t also do that. The guy is outside of establishment politics even if just based on his mannerisms. Trump voters aren’t the most rational people lol.
A lot of it is just people tired of politicians playing the politics game. Like Biden is basically minmaxing talking about his own good achieviments because he’s scared to loose the centrist vote, and that rightfully makes more left leaning people kind of queasy, me included. It effectively discounts the stuff he’s done.
Edit: AND it discounts his own voting base by turning them into numbers. but that’s the two party system for ya. Trump doesn’t really ever worry about that.
He’s down voted for consistent bullshit takes. Look at the post history.
So why not the post itself
Too many people are starting to realize he’s right.
Wow. Blue maga is real, and just as militant culty as Red maga. It’s gross. I almost wish I could unsee. Almost.
Blue maga seems like such a hard sell. Like, I get regular maga, Trump is an asshole, but he’s got personality, he’s entertaining, he’s got all the things you’d need to be a cult leader effectively. Whereas Biden is basically the opposite of Trump personality wise.
You’ve got me, there.
Blue maga?
Why are so many self claimed leftists on here using a Steve Bannon coined term?
Broken clock phenomenon.
Because many self described “leftists” aren’t actually leftist and are just shit posting to drive down voter motivation.
It was a dumb epithet. Until Biden supporters started attacking the fake news media, pushing misinformation, and attacking true blue Democrats for speaking out against the dear leader. Then it became uncomfortably descriptive. When you’re attacking Pod Save America for not being good Democrats you’ve lost the plot completely.
In a nation where 50% of voters are democrats and maybe 200,000 people listen to Pod Save America, the majority of them probably themselves in the media, how many people does the term blue maga apply to here?
Oh, it’s definitely centered on online spaces, primarily Twitter, but filtering through to other forums like Lemmy as Twitter stuff does. It’s a very online group/issue. No one in my regular social networks talks anything like that.
So you dont even know if blue maga is just bot accounts or not?
I assume good faith from the people posting here and the people evidencing it on Mastodon are real people with varied histories and interests. But if they actually were just bot accounts, why would you care that people call them names?
Since you seem curious about the label, here’s a couple of articles about it. Plenty of accounts linked there. Pretty sure the cofounder of MeidasTouch isn’t a bot, nor is the author of Melania and Me.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/jul/15/democrats-joe-biden-maga
https://www.newsweek.com/blue-maga-joe-biden-defense-debate-trump-1922193
You just linked me to two professional spin doctors.
It would be more suprising to me it a spin doctor wasn’t saying stupid shit.
deleted by creator
