• Lemminary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    Crazy how the choice is between “everything the same with mild change (maybe)” and “everything horrible with the world”.

    • Pronell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      74
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      4 months ago

      The choice is between having an opportunity to make a difference and being actively prevented from doing so.

        • Pronell@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          63
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          A Trump administration will jail opponents, accelerate oil and gas drilling, and help to destroy the world that much faster.

          We don’t have any chance to improve things if they win one more time.

          Want a better world? It might be possible to still build one. You can’t look at Joe Biden and say “Eh, not good enough.”

          If his plans aren’t enough for your tastes, organize and do better. Inspire others around you.

          It’s not gonna be easy, and it might not even be possible. But each person who just gives up makes it that much harder for everyone else.

          Me, I’m 50. I don’t have a ton of hope. But I’d like to still have a chance to leave a world to another generation that isn’t completely overrun by fascism.

          Brazil pushed back. So did France and the UK. We CANNOT just give up.

          • can@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Ah alright, for some reason when I read the comment I wasn’t sure who you meant represented which. I’m not American but I’m definitely with you.

          • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            4 months ago

            We aren’t giving up. It was the DNC that gave up. Start putting the blame squarely where it belongs.

              • Aceticon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Blaming those with the least power for not bending the knee to the “leader” the powerfull have imposed on them instead of blaming those with the most power for not putting forward somebody worthy of the loyalty of the rest is a pretty interesting take for somebody posting in a supposedly Progressive forum.

                • Pronell@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  It’s been four years and nobody stepped up.

                  Nobody said they wanted to be the successor. They didn’t build a campaign and start doing press tours.

                  We have No Labels and Brain Worms. That’s it. The progressives did not try to field a candidate, and now you’re saying there’s a boot on your neck.

                  Either fight or keep complaining. Bitching online is not progressive.

                  I’m trying to wake some of you up to the reality that we need to be united and getting a shitload of ‘Meh, whatever.’

                  Extremely hard to believe thats your progressive take.

          • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Edit: There’s some legalese that the DNC is shook about, so fair enough to be worried about Republicans and election shenanigans.

            If his plans aren’t enough for your tastes, organize and do better. Inspire others around you.

            This would be a valid point, if the DNC wasn’t trying to force a primary confirmation vote early, in order to ‘lock in’ Biden. Despite Biden welcoming challengers to make a play to delegates at the convention.

            I.e. “actively prevented from doing so”

              • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                Might be irrelevant given the latest on Biden dropping maybe, but this is still the official line:_

                “no voting will begin before August 1.” They add that the vote is set to happen before the in-person Democratic National Convention that starts Aug. 19

                They’ve now explained the nuance and reasoning, which does change things a fair bit

                In June, Ohio passed a bill to move its deadline from Aug. 7 to Sept. 1. But because that law technically does not take effect until Sept. 1, the DNC said they are keeping their timeline of a pre-convention virtual roll call in place due to concern of litigation. Republican Secretary of State Frank LaRose suggested earlier this month that Sept. 1 deadline to certify a candidate would stand.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          44
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          There’s an election in November, so, no.

          If Trump gets what Project 2025 wants him to have, SCOTUS will repeal term limits, and he’ll challenge the results of the next election using his party-loyal Article F State Department.

          He’ll be “President” the same way Putin is “President.”

          • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            21
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            “but at least we didn’t have to hear biden stutter anymore, so it’s worth it” - crowd that wants their grandchildren growing up under project 2025.

          • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            42
            ·
            4 months ago

            What do you mean “there’s an election in November?”

            The results of that contest have been written on the wall at least as far back as 2015 when the DNC put us on this course.

            The incumbent won’t step down, so the choice is between Trump or the guy that is expected to lose, which isn’t a choice at all.

              • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                3 months ago

                I support a wide range of resistance tactics and I’m not about to tell people to give up, but I will say don’t organize online. Do it in person and leave your phone in another room…

              • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                13
                ·
                3 months ago

                Literally everything the Left predicted in 2016 is happening right now and you are making fun of it as if it’s not that big of a deal.

                Cope.

            • sparkle@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              Cymraeg
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Trump was “expected to lose” the 2016 election. Far more than Biden currently is

              • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                3 months ago

                The 2016 election fell within the margin of error of the polls. Don’t act like Hillary was a shoe-in, nobody who was paying attention was surprised after the shit she and the DNC got up to in the primary.

        • Pronell@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          4 months ago

          You do not get to insist that everything be the way you want it to be.

          Grow up and use the power you actually have rather than spamming your discontent everywhere.

          Work for what you want to happen. Or just roll over and invite the fascists in. Those are your two choices, and you’re saying the first one isn’t a choice.

          That says A WHOLE LOT about you.

          • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            26
            ·
            4 months ago

            You do not get to insist that everything be the way you want it to be.

            It’s a free country. I can insist on whatever I want, just like you are free to ignore me.

            Grow up and use the power you actually have rather than spamming your discontent everywhere.

            I’m almost 40 and I’ve been banging on this drum since Bush v. Gore. If you don’t like having a political conversation with someone who demands better from the Democrats and our government then you’re going to want to stop engaging with politics entirely.

            Work for what you want to happen.

            I’m trying, but people like you keep telling me to resign myself to Biden’s inevitable loss because we can’t do any better.

            Or just roll over and invite the fascists in. Those are your two choices, and you’re saying the first one isn’t a choice.

            Of course there isn’t a choice, we either vote for Biden or we get Trump. That’s not a choice, that’s a hostage situation.

            That says A WHOLE LOT about you.

            Precisely.

    • ÞlubbaÐubba@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      At least with everything the same we maintain the chance to turn it into “make everything better”, as easy as it is to get disillusioned with the system at present, nobody can deny that it’s a lot easier to achieve anything within than a defacto fascist autocracy

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      The amount of change we’ll see will be directly related to congressional control. SCOTUS Justices aren’t going to impeach themselves. AOC can write anything she wants, but it won’t pass a vote with congressional minority.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s the middle class who won’t be.
    It’s the working poor who won’t be.

    Why’d she say “working class” twice?

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        4 months ago

        The idea I was alluding to is that the distinction between “lower class” and “middle class” has always been fictional. It exists only to drive a wedge between working-class folks, for the benefit of the owner class.

        • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          4 months ago

          But if she didn’t specify middle class, those who think of themselves as middle class would think they were going to be okay.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Middle class then: Wealthy people who didn’t hold noble titles

        Middle class now: I’m embarrassed to call myself working class

  • zephorah@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    She forgot pre-existing conditions. Remember, ACA is the only thing that keeps those covered. Diabetes diagnosed now? Your cancer comes back? You have an auto immune disorder like MS?

    She forgot social security. Even without Project 2025 Trump had repeatedly said he wants it gone. All that FICA tax paid never to be seen again. Also, can your parents live without it? Or will they have to move in with you now? Or are you still living with them and you both lose your roof?

    • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      bigger thing is no surprise billing came directly out of bidens administration. that and the non compete thing are big for me.

      • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        Biden earned my vote with those reforms and by capping the price on insulin. People don’t realize how many millions of diabetics who are working poor and massively fucked by the manufacturers - they can literally set whatever price they want, because it’s peoples fucking lives otherwise.

        mind boggling. and these whiny so-called progressives that are going to put trump back in power? guh

        • zephorah@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Oh yeah. Having someone come into the Urgent Care or ED because of a tightness in the chest and shortness of breath because they had to choose between buying insulin and an asthma rescue inhaler this month.

          There are also lots, and I do mean lots, of hospital beds taken up by uncontrolled diabetes. Some of it is flagrant “I don’t want to” in re to eating right and checking blood sugars, but the other half really is people who want to do their best with this trying diagnosis but cannot afford the test strips and medication every month so they ration out things that should never be rationed out or simply go without. There’s a ripple effect across all of heath care access with the fallout from it.

  • samus12345@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is what I think every time I see someone on here haughtily saying that the Democrats need to EARN their vote. The Democrat politicians are wealthy and will be just fine if they’re voted out of office - it’s you and everyone else who isn’t wealthy that will be fucked over.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      In other words, protest votes are an expression of privilege.

    • OutsizedWalrus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m largely convinced most “dems” threatening to withhold their vote are bots and trolls.

      This election is between two well known candidates with presidential records. There’s no earning. You’re either one side or the other.

      • samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        They’re usually not self-declared Democrats. Some may be trolling, but there are plenty of people who don’t seem to understand how FTPT voting works, since they’re always incensed when it’s said that if they don’t vote for Biden, they’re helping Trump (with the assumption that Biden is less bad to them than Trump). That, or they just value feeling like they were morally correct more than real-world consequences.

      • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Then that means that the vast majority of the Lemmy userbase, including the mods and admins, are bots and trolls.

        Not disagreeing with you, just lamenting the absolute shitpile that the threaded Fediverse seems to be. I just wanted decentralized social media.

  • Asifall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m going to vote but damn can we at least acknowledge how depressing it is to be stuck in this position to begin with? If 2016 wasn’t a wake up call I really don’t know how we can snap the Democratic Party out of this corporate controlled mediocrity.

    • masquenox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      how we can snap the Democratic Party out of this corporate controlled mediocrity.

      You can’t “snap the Democratic Party out of this corporate controlled mediocrity” because “corporate controlled mediocrity” is the point.

      What? You actually thought they “represented” you?

      • nyar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        This. This election is Fascist Capitalism versus Fascist-Lite Capitalism, and any attempt to point to some minimal gains made via executive action (when the SC just killed Chevron Deference) since we can’t get actual change through Congress is whitewashing.

    • Syrc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Wake up call for what? They won last election with a corporate candidate and have a decent chance of doing it this time too. Like the post says, they don’t care that much about losing, their life isn’t threatened by it.

      The only thing that can be done is to keep on voting for the non-fascist candidate hoping that one day both of the main parties will present one that fits the category.

  • answersplease77@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    you should vote for Biden if you hate him, that way he dies while still working instead of enjoying his last years golfing and sun bathing under secret service protection

    • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      3 months ago

      So your plan is to attack them with weapons. I mean, it might work I guess. Be careful.

      Otherwise you have no plan. You do understand anyone can participate in the Democratic party and third-parties are guaranteed failure, right? What’s the genius solution then?

      • masquenox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Otherwise you have no plan.

        In other words… just like you. The person you are responding to is just not being dishonest about it.

        • m0darn@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I think the actual action is to engage with the democratic political process.

          So yes, vote. But also go to town hall meetings, and park board meetings, and parent advisory council meetings. Write a letters to your representatives, and then go to one of their events and tell them what you think of their response.

      • The_Terrible_Humbaba@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Voting for Biden/Dems isn’t much of a plan either, it’s just stalling. But you need to stall for something, you need something that you are buying time for.

        In regard to third parties, my country has a different system, a parliamentary one (technically semi-presidential, but for the purposes of the topic, it’s parliamentary), but nevertheless, up until recently we had 2 major parties, and so far only one of the 2 ever won an election, and all my life I’ve often heard the argument of “useful vote” (“voting for someone else is a waste of your vote”) as a justification to vote for one of them, even from journalists and pundits. But the far right, for one reason or another, simply didn’t care about a “useful vote”, and just voted for who they wanted; that is why in our last elections, and for the first time since we’ve had elections, everyone was now talking about 3 choices for a useful vote.

        I know it’s a different system, but the point of the story is that you are engaging in a self-fulfilling prophecy. Neither democrats nor republicans will ever want to change the system because it will hurt them. Voting blue instead of red is a stalling tactic to stop/delay the fascists, but it doesn’t actually solve anything.

        • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          3 months ago

          So you’re not an American voter, and you’re going tell us how American politics works. Or should work.

          Okay - pretty much any other time than the weeks prior to an existential election I’d be interested to talk about that. Right now is not that time however.

      • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t have some magical solution to the flaws of democracy, but any good solution needs to begin with ensuring that the population is politically educated

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    4 months ago

    All those things are what i am voting to keep from happening. The name means squat to me. Its just a placeholder to keep thr fat orange fuck from usurping the place

    • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      If the Democrats ran Wacky Waving Inflatable Arm Flailing Tube Man I’d rather vote for him than Trump.

      • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        That would be hilarious to see in a debate. Just let the felon run his mouth and wave implacably with a smile.

  • rsuri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    Except all those people will also be fine if Kamala Harris wins the presidency. And they won’t be if Biden loses it.

    • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      yes, but everyone is worried too many idiots won’t vote for her. it’s risky. those idiots have stupid reasons like “because she’s a woman” and they suck, but you can’t ignore them this time.

      • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I think the best thing they can do is commit to one candidate. Doesn’t matter who. It could be a pig wearing lipstick. But they gotta commit. No changing their minds at the last minute. Sanders endorsed Biden. AOC endorsed Biden. They should run Biden.

      • rsuri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Well no doubt that will be key. But I think that’ll actually work against Republicans. They think they’re being clever by dogwhistling racism and sexism, but people see through it and don’t want to be associated with it. Besides, it’s near-certain loss with Biden vs risky bet on Kamala.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    3 months ago

    This election is a choice between boring corporatists and 100% concentrated evil. Between someone who is indifferent and someone who has literally promised to make your lives SO MUCH worse in every possible way.

    You had your adorable little protest non-vote in 2016, with your “Hillary Clinton just doesn’t ‘do it’ for me” and the result was Donald farking Trump. Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.

    • SquirtleHermit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      You had your adorable little protest non-vote in 2016, with your “Hillary Clinton just doesn’t ‘do it’ for me” and the result was Donald farking Trump.

      Here is my problem with this mindset. I didn’t have “my adorable little protest non-vote”. I was energized and hopeful for Bernie’s campaign, but the Dem’s and their moderate voter base had their adorable little “Bernie couldn’t possibly win enough votes because Socialism, so you have to vote for our candidate that no one is excited about” push, so I sucked it up and voted for Hillary. And the result was Donald farking Trump. Because moderate Dem’s would rather have Trump than meet Progressives even half way in the middle.

      And now here we are, with another run of a candidate that fails to inspire passion amongst his voter base, going against Donald Farking Trump. And once again, I’m being told that I need to vote for the Dem candidate that I mostly just disagree with less than Donald Farking Trump.

      So when does it stop being the fault of progressives who get disillusioned with the status quo? When does the fault start to lay with the Dem’s and the moderate voters for preferring a Trump presidency over trying to meet the Progressive voting bloc halfway?

      I’ll vote for Biden (again), and I absolutely recommend that everyone do so just to do damage mitigation, but I’m getting so tired of the blame game moderates try and run just to deflect legitimate criticisms of their lackluster candidates.

      Edit: To any on the left that are feeling really jilted by comment’s like NutWrench’s, please try and ignore the bullshit blame Dem’s try to fling our way and remember that the key to long term success is solidarity, including with those who would blame and ridicule us. We need to play the hands we are dealt the best we can, and Biden is currently our “strongest” hand.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      boring corporatists

      Nothing boring about a 110 heat index or a river so slick with filth that the smell alone is hazardous to your health. Nevermind the sky-high electricity bills created by our energy-hungry AI industry or the enormous landfills choked with plastic waste or the privatized schools that serve up a McEducation for an exorbitant price.

      There’s this baseline claim that Biden will keep the state of the country the same. But we’re not a fly trapped in amber, here. We’ve got infrastructure that’s still deteriorating despite the promise of Infrastructure Reinvestment. We’ve got grocery bills that are still rising despite the Inflation Reduction Act. We’ve got real estate consolidation in the residential and agricultural sectors that are steadily raising rents. We’ve got a finance industry that is dead set on forcing everyone onto a highly speculative cryptocurrency system. We’ve got war profiteers racking it in overseas while defense contractors at home sink billions into a militarized southern border.

      This is under Biden. Yeah, sure, blah blah Trump worse. But our best case scenario still looking incredibly bleak.

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    Literally voting for a wet paper bag would be better for those groups than not voting or voting for Trump.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    Then how about he just fucking retires instead of virtually guaranteeing a Trump win. We had this same shit in 2016 because “it’s her turn” and the polls during the primary said she wasn’t going to win against Trump, too.

    God save us from politician’s egos.

    • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      If that’s your argument, you have to address the many, many polls which showed her defeating trump unquestionably. 97% favored her over trump, etc etc etc.

      But yeah, whoever is running against trump for the Democrats will get my vote.

      • ameancow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        many polls which showed her defeating trump unquestionably.

        And if we were counting actual votes, not the imaginary value of areas of abstract landmass, then it would have been accurate and we would have had a competent person with political experience in office for four years during a pandemic.

        Who knows how that alternative history would have gone down. I can only assume that it would have been far better for our nation’s feelings and attitude, which is arguably far more important than even policy. A strong, morally solid population votes in everyone’s best interest, a scared and isolated population votes for whatever seems to give them comfort.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        That was the story for a while. But in October there was a massive surge back for Trump.

        Gee i wonder what happened in October 2016?

  • Varven@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Why can’t America just have the average 40 year old for president

    • legion02@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Obama and gw were both in their early to mid 40s. Gw came from a political family but Obama was pretty average.

    • jaschen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      4 months ago

      I disagree. Find me a president that was under 50 that accomplished more than Biden. It’s not the age, but what they did for the American population.

        • jaschen@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          4 months ago

          Sorta unfair since Teddy Roosevelt pretty much served 3 terms.

          Several U.S. presidents have served between the ages of 40 and 50 years old. Here’s a list of those who were inaugurated during this age range:

          1. Theodore Roosevelt - 42 years old
          2. John F. Kennedy - 43 years old
          3. Bill Clinton - 46 years old
          4. Ulysses S. Grant - 46 years old
          5. Barack Obama - 47 years old
          6. Grover Cleveland - 47 years old (first term)
          7. Franklin Pierce - 48 years old
          8. James A. Garfield - 49 years old

          I mean, outside of JFK. There weren’t really any other presidents that stood out. Why do you want a president that is in their 40s?

          • Varven@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Why do I want a president that’s 40 years old so they don’t die during there term and they don’t have dementia

            • jaschen@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              It would be nice, but there is little chance anyone else can beat trump. Let’s figure out who to vote for in 5 years when Trump is in prison.