I rarely play anything from the past 5 years but when I do there’s a noticeable difference in how the games are rendered compared to up until the early PS4 era. Transparent voluminous materials like hair or foliage have this fuzzy pixelated look to them, and there’s a lot of rasterisation that looks like it’s being rendered on the Sega Saturn. Then there’s tons of odd shimmering going on everywhere, and I’m not sure if it’s due to dynamic resolution scaling, ambient occlusion or dynamic reflections

Overall games don’t look quite as sharp and defined as older games though they simultaneously have lots more detail. It’s weird

  • Cowbee [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Devs push graphics beyond their reasonable limits in some weird arms-race.

    Hollow Knight, Celeste, hell even Cruelty Squad all look amazing in their own ways. Graphics need to be smarter, not harder to process.

    • ashinadash [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      To me the most prominent example is the start of this generation: when the PS5 and Series X came out all the games were like 4k and 60/120, but once games targeted that hardware it became joever. Jedi Survivor at like 792p FSR and sub 30fps.

      • Cowbee [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Every time, haha. I miss the old days where devs pulled clever tricks, or outright didn’t increase fidelity due to the hardware, not trying to push only photorealism for every game.

        • ashinadash [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Weirdly I noticed that, while the really heavy games got uglier and slower, most PS4 games still have decent resolutions (System Shock remake) unlike PS360 where resolutions tanked in the latter half of the gen.

          But also yea I miss being excited for new hardware

          • Cowbee [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yep, I have a fancy gaming PC right now but once it dies I am going for efficiency and embracing stable refresh rates at decent PPI displays without upscaling, if that means a return to 1080p 24 inches I will go that route.

              • Cowbee [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                Nice! Consistently hitting that 144 FPS cap at 1080p, 24inches must be nice. Easier to hit the caps, smoother gameplay, lower power draw. I’m here for it, honestly.

                4k can stick to movies, even if it can be nice, it’s just too expensive to actually achieve at reasonable framerates for most games even with upscaling.

                • ashinadash [she/her]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  She tends to use 120 because A) matches her Zephyrus G14 screen refresh B) easier to hit C) 2× 60fps, but yeah it slaps. It also has freesync and gsync which are soooooo cooooool.

                  I have a few 4k blurays and that’s it tbh, I do not see a reason to upgrade to 4K. Most GPUs still struggle yeah, so…