Harris secures enough delegate endorsements to win the Democratic presidential nomination | CNN Politics
www.cnn.com
Kamala Harris has the support of enough Democratic delegates to win the party’s nomination for president, according to CNN’s delegate estimate.

Kamala Harris has the support of enough Democratic delegates to win the party’s nomination for president, according to CNN’s delegate estimate.

While endorsements from delegates continue to come in, the vice president has now been backed by well more than the 1,976 pledged delegates she’ll need to win the nomination on the first ballot.

Harris crossed the threshold amid a wave of endorsements from state delegations Monday evening.

  • TinidrilEnglish
    11·
    4 months ago

    Agreed, but that’s not really relevant as to whether or not we should wait for the convention for the delegates to choose. The primary election is done.

    • Carrolade@lemmy.worldEnglish
      8·
      4 months ago

      They are waiting for the convention to choose, these choices are not made yet. They do, however, still have first amendment protections, so if they want to tell CNN who they plan to vote for, then they may. CNN, enjoying freedom of the press, has the right to ask.

      • TinidrilEnglish
        13·
        4 months ago

        It’s wagging the dog. The delegates declare support now, the media runs with that and treats Harris as the obvious winner while ignoring other candidates. By the time the convention happens the public has already accepted Harris as the winner, making it inevitable.

        • Carrolade@lemmy.worldEnglish
          4·
          4 months ago

          Well, it pretty much is inevitable. Nobody else really wants the job on such short notice. President is something you want to prepare for, have a good, solid plan, with people you’re planning on staffing your presidency with. You usually start the groundwork years in advance, to avoid failure with extraordinary consequences once you are actually in office. There’s reasons Whitmer, for instance, simply endorsed Harris even though a lot of people wanted her to be the nominee.

          Even Manchin waffled on it in his interview, and he’s a colossally arrogant asshole.

          • TinidrilEnglish
            11·
            4 months ago

            Nobody else really wants the job on such short notice.

            This is testament to how deceived you are by whatever media you consume. There were no other candidates who were allowed into the public discourse, but there were plenty of other candidates running. If there were an actual primary there would have been a lot more.

            • Carrolade@lemmy.worldEnglish
              2·
              4 months ago

              Names?

              At any rate, I don’t think it’s the DNC’s job to support any specific candidate. They made that mistake with Hilary vs Bernie, and hopefully learned from the blowback they subsequently received.

              It is an individual candidate’s responsibility to create their own public discourse, this is the process of campaigning. Otherwise it becomes too tempting to use a Presidential run simply to increase one’s own individual fame.

              Lastly, perhaps I should have been more specific. I don’t think any strong candidates want the job. I’m sure plenty of weak candidates and frankly, foolish people, would love to have the job because they wrongly think it wouldn’t be that hard.

              • TinidrilEnglish
                11·
                4 months ago

                Find the names yourself. It will be a good exercise in media literacy. They aren’t hidden.

                When did I say it’s the DNC’s job to support a specific candidate, or are you agreeing with me? In any case, it sure doesn’t look like they learned anything.

                I don’t trust your judgement as to who makes a strong or weak candidate. I certainly don’t trust the judgement of a party establishment that backed Hillary in 2016 and Biden this year.

                • Carrolade@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  2·
                  4 months ago

                  Yeah, I think you’re just throwing random bullshit around and have no interest in wasting my own time.

                  You seem to be asserting that you think the DNC should elevate lesser-known candidates to equal stature of a well-known candidate, instead of leaving it to the candidates themselves.

                  I do not think the DNC should elevate anyone anywhere. They should not support a popular candidate, but they also should not support a lesser-known candidate. They should set a reasonable bar where all candidates that can prove themselves serious, unaided, can participate equally in DNC sponsored events. This should keep out fame seekers that want the profile boost, I have no interest in what some author that wants to sell more books to gullible idiots has to say.

                  Fine, you’re entitled to your own opinion I suppose.

                  • TinidrilEnglish
                    1·
                    4 months ago

                    You seem to be asserting that you think the DNC should elevate lesser-known candidates to equal stature of a well-known candidate

                    Based on what? Me never saying anything of the sort?

                    They should set a reasonable bar where all candidates that can prove themselves serious, unaided, can participate equally in DNC sponsored events.

                    This is exactly what I’m saying. Would you say that’s happening? What presidential candidates will be given equal time to Harris for a floor speech at the convention? Where were the 2024 primary debates?

                    They should set a reasonable bar where all candidates that can prove themselves serious

                    Marianne Williamson is every establishment wonk’s favorite “unserious” candidate. Yet she somehow did better than a lot of “serious” candidates in the 2020. Who is or is not a “serious” candidate is dictated by the political and media establishments.