• SuperCub@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    I listened to it. It was an OK speech, but it willfully ignored the agency of Israel in the destruction of the Palestinian people. She called Hamas terrorists, but what about Israel? What do you call an administration and a nation’s army that’s committing genocide? She gave no scoldings to Israel, which to me is weak sauce.

    • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think this was pretty much the best that could be expected from an american presidential candidate. Israel’s position in the geopolitical balance of power makes it impossible for her to just outright denounce them. She’s signalling that she’s (hopefully) going to be less limp-wristed than Biden was on the issue, but the US’s hands are largely tied when it comes to Israel - at least for as long as the forward outpost in the Middle East is as desirable as it still is to US interests.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not just the strategic value, but also the fact that the Netanyahu camp and allies will cry “antisemitism” in the face of any significant criticism, which could be disastrous for an election campaign.

      • SuperCub@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        All she had to do was say “Two wrongs don’t make a right. End the genocide.” Netanyahu has a warrant for arrest by the international criminal court. Israel’s only remaining ally is the US at this point.