For me, I really want to get into niri, but the lack of XWayland support scares me (I know there’s solutions, but I don’t understand them yet).

Also, I stopped using Emacs (even though I love its design and philosophy with my whole heart) because it’s very slow, even as a daemon.

  • Daniel Quinn@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    Btrfs. I’ve been using ext4 for so long, I’m afraid that switching up will just annoy me.

    Zsh: same reason.

    • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      Perhaps you are a more discerning filesystem user than I am, but I don’t think I’ve actually noticed any difference on btrfs except that I can use snapshots and deduplication.

      • FrederikNJS@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Not OP , but regarding zsh, it has much better auto completion, and suggestion support. Additionally you can theme your prompt much more, see for example powerlevel10k

      • Daniel Quinn@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Honestly, the only btrfs feature that interests me is the snapshotting, as the current state of my backups is rather sub-par. There’s just a lot of inertia involved in adopting it when ext4 Just Works™. Maybe next time I install a new system I’ll give it a shot.

        As for zsh, I rather like the general “intelligence” I see on others’ machines: the way it autocorrects typos, draws a navigable menu for tab completions complete with colour highlighting… it looks lovely. I’ve been a Bash user for 25 years though, and muscle memory like smashing the tab key to get what I want is a hard habit to break.

      • Daniel Quinn@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Actually, tutorials like that are a big reason that I don’t want to switch. The first steps are things like:

        • Install these fonts that only work in a GUI environment
        • Install these programs straight from GitHub without your package manager

        …and all I hear is: “this stuff isn’t ready yet” and “I’m going to be staring at Unicode glyphs the next time I have to tinker outside of my GUI”.

        If I can’t easily and securely install a shell on every environment I use as I don’t want to be constantly context switching, then I’m going to have to stick to Bash.

        • crater2150@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          …and all I hear is: “this stuff isn’t ready yet” and “I’m going to be starring at Unicode glyphs the next time I have to tinker outside of my GUI”.

          This really isn’t a zsh problem, but a “people putting too much stuff in a ‘getting started’ config”.

          I used zsh for 15 years before looking at any plug-in manager, you can get a lot of the good stuff like the completion by just going through the first-run wizard included in zsh. A lot of stuff is included directly with zsh, including various prompt themes (which is what that tutorial wants extra fonts for, because they use a fancy prompt with custom glyphs; I don’t think any of the built-in ones need that)

          Things like fuzzy history search with fzf is usually included with fzf’s distro package and the additional zsh-completions package for less used or newer commands is also packaged by most distros. In my experience, a lot of the other plugins are stuff that could be a standalone script instead of a plug-in anyway.

          • Daniel Quinn@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Well that’s much more encouraging. I may just give it a try if the first run wizard is simple enough. Thanks!