• dactylotheca@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    136
    ·
    4 months ago

    “Harris immediately framed her candidacy with a specific false reference to this case as a contest of ‘prosecutor vs. convicted felon,’” Trump’s filing says.

    Harris’ framing is an “inaccurate attack,” it adds, without describing an inaccuracy. Harris is a former district attorney for San Francisco and attorney general for California; in May, Trump became the first former president convicted of a felony.

    This is straight out of the reich wing playbook; they’ll complain about how this or that is a lie, but they will never fucking ever actually specify what was the part that was incorrect. They just go “librul lies!” and their base eats it the fuck up

    • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      67
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      If you’ve ever known a particular type of abusive person, this is a pretty standard tactic. Information I don’t want you to say is “lies,” and if you say it, I will attack you. Information I want you to say is “the truth.” These categories are extremely consistent and play a pivotal role in the abuse; if you view the terminology in that light, a lot of things (like not even pretending there is some factual backing needed for the claim of “an inaccurate attack”) start to make sense.

      • dactylotheca@suppo.fi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        No no, it’s a lie. Definitely a lie. Not going to tell you why it’s a lie, but it’s a lie.