• rustyfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Honestly the 2004 reboot did age quite well for a SciFi show. No need to reboot it again just now.

    • grozzle@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      fun fact - even if it got greenlit for pre-production today, the third BSG would be released about as long after the second ended, as the second came out after the first.

  • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m torn about this reboot of a reboot. On the one hand, the BSG reboot is one of my all-time favorites, although the religious overtones lessened my enjoyment. And just like another of my favorites, Star Gate, they now are in the talks to get a reboot. On the other hand, a reboot is about the only way we will get more from either franchise.

    • MudMan@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      See, the weird religious pivot entirely ruined it for me, to the point where I can’t tolerate even the good bits. But also, that is the case so much that I don’t want to engage with a re-reboot anyway, so I’m weirdly in the same place.

  • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    I watched both shows growing up. They are like very different from each other. I would be curious how another reboot would change it up.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Good. It did not need to exist.

    BSG was fine back in the day, aged terribly.
    Galactica 1980 wasn’t even good in 1980.

    Reboot was excellent. Put a pin in it. Do something new.