• Socialist Berserker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    1 个月前

    Oh, ok, cool. Then the Democratic and Republican parties have nothing to fear from her.

    So they should be fine with debating her and having her on the ballot. I mean, hey she’s “completely irrelevant,” right?

    • MentallyExhausted@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 个月前

      Being completely irrelevant, there’s no reason to waste time debating her, but if she meets the criteria for either I don’t think anybody cares.

      • Socialist Berserker@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        1 个月前

        Being completely irrelevant, there’s no reason to waste time debating her, but if she meets the criteria for either I don’t think anybody cares.

        So what is threshold do you think she, or ANY 3rd party candidate, needs to meet to be considered worthy of a debate? Serious question. Because her party is the 4th biggest political party in the US. Behind Libertarians.