No licking!

  • InquisitiveApathy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    244
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I have family in Utah and there’s a pretty common joke in this vein.

    Why do you always invite two Mormons to a party?

    Because if you only invite one they will drink all your beer.

    • thirteene@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Jews don’t recognize Jesus.

      Protestants don’t recognize the Pope.

      Mormons don’t recognize each other in wendover

    • sibannac@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      That was the joke about Baptists in my hometown. It was impossible to only invite one since everyone knew everyone’s families.

  • superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    They could also use the poophole loophole.
    A tampon soaked in Vodka and inserted anally gets you drunk fast.
    At least that’s what a friend told me.

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      But then some alcohol might get on your magic underwear and then you’re just a run of the mill sinner again

      • moody@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        3 months ago

        The poophole loophole usually means something different. They say anal sex doesn’t count as “losing your virginity.” So they can have all the premarital sex they want, as long as it’s in the pooper.

    • hddsx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Okay. I can’t tell if you’re serious, but if that’s true, how does that work medically?

      Don’t liquids get absorbed through the intestines? Can you even stick something up your butt far enough to reach your intestines?

      • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s capillary action. It just rams straight into your bloodstream, no dilution or waiting to go through stomach. It’s fast and effective.

        • snooggums
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          3 months ago

          Plus the excitement of risking an overdose!

        • hddsx@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          So, as it doesn’t go through the stomach, do you not puke if you’re experiencing alcohol poisoning?

          • ShepherdPie
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I’m sure you’d still puke as it’s nausea that makes you vomit not alcohol sitting in your stomach.

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        Alcohol gets absorbed by mucus membrane much faster than by going through your digestive tract. And your anus is lined with mucus membrane.
        It was a craze a decade or so ago where I live, cause teenagers did that to get drunk without having their breath smell of alcohol, and some of them ended up in the ER.

        • RattlerSix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          It was also a crazy in the US. They called it butt chugging. It was funny to hear politicians talk about how we needed to do something about butt chugging

        • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          cause teenagers did that to get drunk without having their breath smell of alcohol

          Did they ever realize that’s not how that works?

          • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Oh but it is. Not familliar with the phrase “boofing,” are you? Works for more than just booze, too, all kinds of things can become a suppository and affect your brain if you ignore the doctors warning you it could kill you, or listen to the ones saying “here’s some butt pills.”

            • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              3 months ago

              I’m very familiar. That’s why I know it won’t keep the smell of alcohol off your breath. The alcohol goes to the blood, and a byproduct goes to the lungs which is exhaled. You can’t defeat a breathalyzer by shoving booze up your ass.

              • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 months ago

                Ooohhh I see what you mean, my mistake! I’m used to people saying buttchugging itself is a myth and doesn’t work, so I misunderstood!

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        Additionally to what others have said it’s also quite dangerous. You can drink a fatal amount of alcohol but your body will generally puke before it absorbs enough to kill you.

        Using this method (boofing), you don’t have that defense, it’s absorbed too quickly and your body doesn’t generally shit itself to expel poison.

      • Azzu@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Are your dumps really smaller than a tampon? If they aren’t, why do you think your hole would need to be especially gaped?

        • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I looked it up and I get it now. I assumed O.B. style tampon with no applicator, which would be difficult to insert. The info I found shows the soaking of the tampon inside the applicator, which makes a lot more sense.

          • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 months ago

            As soon as you asked your initial question I too was imagining someone trying to fit a fully expanded tampon inside them … which is a though I wish I hadn’t

      • Skua@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        My relatively limited contact with Jewish culture has painted a picture in which this kind of technicality is, in fact, part of the culture itself. It’s great

      • Badabinski@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        Honestly, I kinda love the whole “lawyering with God” thing that Jewish folks have going on. For any religion with restrictive beliefs, there will be adherents who will try to find loopholes. I’ve been lucky enough to have an upbringing almost completely free from religion (except for a year drinking hot chocolate at a Unitarian Universalist church, which is almost not religion), but I also grew up in a super Mormon part of Utah. I’ve spent my whole life as a bit of an outsider, seeing people pick and choose which rules to follow and try to discretely find and exploit every little loophole there is. I’ve always found the hypocrisy a bit unsettling.

        I think I’d really prefer it if the Mormons took the same argumentative stance with their god. It would make the picking and choosing a bit less hypocritical (which might lead to more Mormons ditching some of their religion’s shittiest and most regressive teachings), and there’d be a lot less shitty sneaking around.

        • dan1101@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s also ridiculous because God didn’t decree any of that, it’s past people who wrote the rules.

      • wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        More than 200 cities around the world are partially encircled by an eruv.

        Partially?

          • wewbull@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            In which case the city is not “partially encircled”, but “parts of the city are encircled”. Makes much more sense now.

        • teft@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah, they usually only put them up in neighborhoods with a large portion of jewish people since it has to be checked for contiguity before every sabbath. That alone limits how large a portion of the city you could enclose.

  • Flax@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    What I find mad about this is that the Jesus they claim to follow (and totally not Joseph Smith who they really follow) drank wine and commanded His followers to do so

    • wjrii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Growing up Mormon in the 80s (I got better!), they insisted to us kids that it was just grape juice, and for adults they simply put a social stigma on asking too many questions, or any uncomfortable questions.

      If there is a theological principal in play it’s that they view their prophets as still able to receive Bible-level revelations, and if their non-trinitarian God committee tells Joseph Smith that wine is bad now, then wine is bad now. If human nature then results in believers feeling like sinners who need to make it up to their community and their church leaders, then oh so sad, but it can result in the Lord’s work being done.

      In general Mormon theology is rather literal and childlike, only getting complicated when trying to work around some established Christian doctrine that no new book overrides (yet!). It’s almost like some provincial huckster was making it up as he went along…

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, just like how black people were bad and the “children of Ham” or whatever. After the Civil Rights Movement, Morman God mysteriously changed his mind and said “black people are ok now”.

        • wjrii@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 months ago

          That didn’t happen until the Department of Education in the Carter administration started talking about whether students at BYU should be getting federal grants and loans, and I believe the NCAA was making some noise as well.

      • Flax@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Paul even writes in his first epistle to Timothy (5:23)

        No longer drink only water, but use a little wine for the sake of your stomach and your frequent ailments.

        This was because people were getting sick from drinking plain water (as they didn’t have the same water purifying technology then) so it was common to add a bit of wine to cleanse it antibacterial. Grape juice in this context would make zero sense. Would also hark back to what Luke wrote in The Acts of the Apostles 10:9-16 regarding a vision Peter received:

        The next day, as they were on their journey and approaching the city, Peter went up on the housetop about the sixth hour to pray. And he became hungry and wanted something to eat, but while they were preparing it, he fell into a trance and saw the heavens opened and something like a great sheet descending, being let down by its four corners upon the earth. In it were all kinds of animals and reptiles and birds of the air. And there came a voice to him: “Rise, Peter; kill and eat.” But Peter said, “By no means, Lord; for I have never eaten anything that is common or unclean.” And the voice came to him again a second time, “What God has made clean, do not call common.” This happened three times, and the thing was taken up at once to heaven.

        Although, this doesn’t really work in regard to the Mormon thinking that some guy can override the Bible and that the book of Mormon overrides it. Reminds me of a video a mormon made reading through John’s gospel according to Joseph Smith or something where he adds in extra stuff through some claimed revelation/restoration. There were comments of people saying “okay but there are no evidence for these texts existing from the early church” and the guy just responded with “but Joseph smith said”

    • jeff 👨‍💻@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      The Word of Wisdom, which outlines the health guidelines of not drinking alcohol and using tobacco, as well as eating less meat, eating more grains; was originally just as the name suggests, words of wisdom.

      Joseph Smith drank wine, used tobacco, and drank coffee up to his death.

      It wasn’t until the early 20th century when it started to be treated as a commandment. This is around the time when they started codifying a lot of doctrine, stopped practicing polygamy, and started to function more like a mainstream religion and less like a cult.

      Source: raised Mormon, went on mission, took religion classes at BYU-Provo on church history.