Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Ohio Sen. JD Vance have agreed to debate each other on Oct. 1, setting up a matchup of potential vice presidents as early voting in some states gets underway for the general election.

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 months ago

    Probably will invite the “both sides” crowd, but if I had to pick between someone who had a DUI charge but more importantly lied about it later…or someone who wrote a prologue and endorsed a fascist manifesto…not really a hard choice there. I mean, in WWII the Allies all had their problems and egomaniacs who could rightly be criticized for some bad decisions. But the other side was Hitler. So…

    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t recall his campaign lying about the DUI, so I think the commentor is setting up a false problem. What I do know is that Walz gave up drinking afterwards and has been sober since. Thats what you lean into. “I fucked up and faced the problem head on.”

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 months ago

        Looking it up it seems that while there have been a few changes over the years to the story, it’s because he started telling the truth about what happened to be up front to the public. I don’t think this is the smear that Republicans are hoping for.

        But again, it’s not quite the level of a fascist. This shouldn’t be a hard pick for any American who remembers history. Even the Joker picked the right side when given these kinds of choices.

      • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        If you have to dig back to 95 to find dirt on somebody and that dirt was a dumb mistake thousands of people make each year and it led to meaningful change, you got a whole lot of nothing. How the hell are you going to turn that into “this guy shouldnt be VP”?

      • millifoo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think the commentor is setting up a false problem.

        https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/15/politics/tim-walz-2006-campaign-falsely-described-dwi-kfile/index.html

        "According to court and police records connected to the incident, Walz admitted in court that he had been drinking when he was pulled over for driving 96 mph in a 55 mph zone in Nebraska. Walz was then transported by a state trooper to a local hospital for a blood test, showing he had a blood alcohol level of .128

        […] in 2006, his campaign repeatedly told the press that he had not been drinking that night, claiming that his failed field sobriety test was due to a misunderstanding related to hearing loss from his time in the National Guard. The campaign also claimed that Walz was allowed to drive himself to jail that night."

        I don’t think this is the smear that Republicans are hoping for.

        I truly hope not. But they’re grasping at straws, they’ll try and use anything they can get.