• Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    168
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Not gonna lie, that headline had me on the first half. I was getting mad up until the last three words.

    • AtomicTacoSauce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Same. I started thinking “why, that stupid shit-for-brains…” and had to reel that in with the last few words.

      ::confused slow clap::

        • sugartits@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 months ago

          When it came to the Ukraine situation, he has, in general, not missed a beat.

          The UK has given an impressive amount of gear to the Ukrainians given the size of the UK military, whilst everyone else was dithering and wondering what to give and how much to ensure they still had some stuff at home, the UK attitude was “give them all the things and we’ll worry about it later”.

          Obviously countries like Poland had to be more cautious.

          A lot of training and intelligence has been given to Ukraine as well. The UK continues to host Ukrainian troops for training.

          The UK even made binding “boots on the ground” support agreements to Norway and Sweden in case Russia tried anything during their NATO membership process.

          UK gave a bunch of Challenger 2 tanks with “do what you like with them” terms, not just “pwease don’t shooty shoot on Wussian tewwitory” nonsense. This was a token gesture as actually Ukraine really wanted the German stuff but it opened the door a bit to basically embarrass Germany into getting it’s act together.

          As much as I don’t like the man, Johnson did well when it came to supporting Ukraine, and credit should be given where it is due.

          • fadhl3y@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yes, I think we can all be thankful that all of the major British political parties were united on the need to support Ukraine. As my Ukrainian friends will always point out - Don’t think of it as Europe “helping” Ukraine - instead think of it as Ukraine taking the brunt of Russian aggression to save Europe.

    • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      3 months ago

      And it’s so easily fixable too. “Boris Johnson calls to lift ban on Ukraine using”… etc. or just move “to be lifted” immediately after “ban”.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    These limitations on Ukraine really need to be lifted. Ukraine needs freedom to attack the best strategic targets they can, whether they are in Ukraine occupied areas or in Russia. Since Russia annexed the occupied territories, there’s not a big difference anyway.

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      61
      ·
      3 months ago

      The only problem I see is that it’s escalatory. If Ukraine starts using Western-supplied weapons for offensive operations, this situation goes from supplying war material for defense (under-the-table proxy war) to full-on overt proxy war. Russia will spin this as “NATO is using Ukraine to attack us” (though they’re probably doing that already).

      I can’t see how this won’t lead to a wider conflict.

        • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          30
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’m sure you’re right.

          How do we use our understanding of that, and the way that they operate, to avoid a full scale war?

          • Just_Pizza_Crust@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            40
            ·
            3 months ago

            There IS a full scale war going on. 31,000 confirmed dead Ukranian soldiers, and up to 120,000 dead Russian soldiers. We don’t even have a good idea how many civilian deaths, but the total death toll could be as high as 500,000.

            And no, before you start - Mutually Assured Destruction isn’t “a full scale war”. Its Annihilation of both sides, and has no precedent in the history of war.

              • mommykink@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                15
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Putin can’t even hold his own territory. I don’t think even he would open another front by attacking a NATO member even if the west started greenlighting their weapons be used in the incursion.

              • 5in1k@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                If Nato got involved directly Moscow would be leveled in a month.

          • Dremor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            We already crossed many times their “red lines”. This is just the good old “China’s Final Warning”.

            They are already barely managing to slowly advance against a single foe, which is still transitioning between the old soviet warfare ways toward NATO’s one, with far less soldiers, I doubt they would ever hold against the full alliance firepower.

      • FelixCress@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        The only problem I see is that it’s escalatory

        Wasn’t invading Ukraine escalatory in the first place?

      • Pistcow@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        K. Russia cant even defend itself from Ukraine. Lets transition to the find out stage.

      • YeetPics@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        You can thank Putin for making it go this far.

        Time he pays the piper.

      • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Russia is Already losing to U.S. weapons being used by Ukraine. Do you really think they want to find out what U.S. weapons used by the U.S. feels like?

  • fluxion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    3 months ago

    I feel like he changed his mind when he saw how upset i was while reading through the first half

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I will admit that I am confounded by how often I agree with Boris Johnson’s views on providing military aid to Ukraine, considering I almost always vehemently disagree with him on pretty much anything and everything else.

    • Gork@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah he’s one of the very few Western politicians who is taking the threat Russia poses to European security seriously. I found it unexpected tbh considering all of his other views.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Well foreign policy and domestic policy are two completely different things.

  • BenLeMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Doesn’t Storm Shadow require Western operators to program targets? I want Ukraine to win this war of national survival (unlike the US administration) but Western operators programming missiles to hit targets in Russia does sound escalatory to me. I’d rather see Ukraine receive a decent number of F16s (i.e. much more than currently pledged) with corresponding munitions. There’s a lot of really useful stuff in the Western arsenal that would otherwise remain unused forever, including older-gen glide bombs & standoff weapons. It’s not going to be the Wunderwaffen winning this war, anyway. But an ample supply of decent weapons could work wonders. Just look at the success of Russia’s cheap glide bomb upgrades. (Sorry for the wall of text, by the way, but I can’t get Connect for Android to retain line breaks)

  • Rin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Based Boris

    edit: I was joking 🥲