renzev@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 month agoAI's take on XMLlemmy.worldimagemessage-square68fedilinkarrow-up154arrow-down10cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.world
arrow-up154arrow-down1imageAI's take on XMLlemmy.worldrenzev@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square68fedilinkcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.world
minus-squareAeonFelis@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoXML is good for markup. The problem is that people too often confuse “markup” and “serialization”.
minus-squarebss03@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoToo redundant, just use S-exprs. (Mostly joking, but in some cases…)
minus-squareDr. Bluefall@toast.ooolinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoUnironically. Given the choice between S-expressions and XML, I will choose S-expressions.
XML is good for markup. The problem is that people too often confuse “markup” and “serialization”.
Too redundant, just use S-exprs.
(Mostly joking, but in some cases…)
Unironically.
Given the choice between S-expressions and XML, I will choose S-expressions.