• idegenszavak@sh.itjust.works
    68·
    2 months ago

    I’ve seen this a lot of times, and I still love it. Usually there are some comments asking whats going on, by some people not knowing some layers, but I can’t see one yet. Are we finally arrived to an utopia where everyone knows all refrences? Where is today’s lucky 10000?

  • half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world
    16·
    2 months ago

    A+

    Is there a name for a rememberrey like this, but it is a very specific meme crossover?

    Like, a t-shirt with the Mario font but the text is bros before hoes, or something mainstream pumpkin spice like that. That’s a normal crossover.

    I only like crossovers when no one else in my life will understand them, whatever you call them.

      • half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world
        3·
        2 months ago

        I also want the description to only be understood by the in group.

        Like saying 196 to someone, or reciting the pillars poem, or the 40k mechanius creed.

    • nul@programming.dev
      3·
      2 months ago

      I enjoyed hearing about meme crossovers in a recurring Reply All segment where they would take a host who didn’t understand a complicated Tweet and break down all the pieces.

      Here’s an excerpt that stuck with me:

      PJ: Dog underscore rates. Ok. So, there is a–there is a Twitter account, uh, that has over 2 million followers.

      ALEX BLUMBERG: Ok.

      PJ: And it is devoted to rating peoples’ dogs,

      ALEX BLUMBERG: Rating them.

      PJ: Yeah. So like, scale of one to ten?

      ALEX BLUMBERG: Ohhhh.

      PJ: Except they always give them above 10. Like, every single time. Um, can I just show you the best moment in WeRateDogs™’ history? Where a guy got angry, that he thought the ratings system was skewed?

      ALEX BLUMBERG: Uh, so, this guy Brant?

      PJ: Yeah.

      ALEX BLUMBERG: He was like, “@dog_rates You’re rating system sucks! Just change your name to cute dogs!” And then WeRateDogs™ wrote back: “Why are you so mad, Bront?” And then he said, “Well, you give every dog 11s and 12s, it doesn’t even make any sense!” (laughing) That’s a guy who is not in on the joke.

      PJ: Yes.

      ALEX BLUMBERG: (laughing) And then WeRateDogs™–and then WeRateDogs™ says, “They’re good dogs, Brent.” Brant: “It’s a cheap gimmick!” WeRateDogs™: “Well Brint, (laughing) the people love it and I’m doing it for them, not you.” Uh. Brent: “All I’m saying is you could have real legitimate ratings instead of every just saying (laughing) every dog is a 10, 11, or 12”

      PJ: So like, that is basically–that is like a good encapsulation of what is good about this.

      ALEX BLUMBERG: (laughing)

      PJ: (laughing) Alex Blumberg is losing his mind.

      ALEX BLUMBERG: Oh, “They’re good dogs, Brent” is really funny.

      Here’s the episode: https://gimletmedia.com/shows/reply-all/o2ho9j

      Miss that show.

  • BreadOven@lemmy.world
    41·
    2 months ago

    Hahaha. I didn’t even realize it was supposed to be Alison Burke at first. Good one.