For some women in China, “Barbie” is more than just a movie — it’s also a litmus test for their partner’s views on feminism and patriarchy.

The movie has prompted intense social media discussion online, media outlets Sixth Tone and the China Project reported this week, prompting women to discuss their own dating experiences.

One user on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu — a photo-sharing site similar to Instagram that’s mostly used by Gen Z women — even shared a guide on Monday for how women can test their boyfriends based on their reaction to the film.

According to the guide, if a man shows hatred for “Barbie” and slams female directors after they leave the theatre, then this man is “stingy” and a “toxic chauvinist,” according to Insider’s translation of the post. Conversely, if a man understands even half of the movie’s themes, “then he is likely a normal guy with normal values and stable emotions,” the user wrote.

  • doggle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    Women in the US are doing that too.

    I guess it works, to a point. If your man throws a Shapiro-esque fit over this movie he probably isn’t great to be around the rest of the time.

  • Arotrios@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    I have to admit, Barbie becoming a Chinese feminist icon was not on my 2023 bingo card. Anyone taking bets on when we’re gonna get a kpop version of this classic?

  • spiderjuzce@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    I think if anyone gets mad at a Barbie movie or some random article on the internet that has nothing to do with them, that’s a good sign they’re emotionally unstable

    • oatscoop
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’d call it emotionally immature.

      A surprising number of the people I grew up or work with act like they’re still in high school when it comes to social/interpersonal skills – these people are all well over 30 years old.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I am only 42, but I work with a bunch of 60+ y/os. They never grow out of it from what I can tell. If they are like that in their 30s they’ll be like that till they die most of the time.

    • whatsarefoogee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Define “mad”. I’ve watched it (arrr) myself and The Barbie movie is very political, despite them completely hiding it in the trailers and the promotional material.

      Fervent political media tends to rile people up, especially when it’s very one-sided. I presume you haven’t seen it and think people are upset over a light hearted comedy.

      • betheydocrime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s not one-sided, though. It argues that both matriarchy and patriarchy are not inclusive ways of operating a society. The movie did not shy away from showing Ken’s dissatisfaction living under a matriarchy, just like it did not shy away from showing Gloria and Sasha’s dissatisfaction with living under a patriarchy

        • RavenFellBlade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          That really is the whole point, too. The entire conflict is based on the fact that Barbieland is a construct of the imaginary world created by girls playing with their dolls, in which Ken has only ever been marketed or existed as an accessory to Barbie. His entire existence, in both the real world of marketing and consumerism, and in the imaginary world of Barbie, is predicated solely on giving Barbie arm candy. I’m not entirely convinced that this point was entirely deliberate, but it really does highlight that, in creating a product to give girls a role model that says they can do and be whatever they want, that those girls internalized their understanding of the male-dominated world around them, and flipped that on its head. Their imaginary world is a very literal mirror to our own, and as a result, it is still dominated by the same inherently sexist attitudes, only kinder and gentler because they are created through the lens of childhood innocence. Kids are only able to create with tools and media they understand, and the polarized nature of the world around them, and our intense need to make everything a binary, means that a “fair world” never looks like one where everyone is treated the same. It’s a world where they’re in charge.

          I’m not even going to get into the overtly sexist assumption that only girls play with dolls, and with Barbie in particular. Toys are toys, and I never understood the need to tell a kid that something is off limits because it’s pink or is “a doll”. The people who most strongly hold these beliefs tend to be the ones that grew up when GI Joe was a full size doll just like Barbie, with his own clothes and uniforms and such. Well before the idea of an “action figure” came around. These folks played with dolls that were, for all intents and purposes, functionally identical to any girls’ doll of the day, and yet are so quick to slap a Barbie or a Bratz doll out of the hands of their grandsons.

          Anyhow, long story short, it’s a great movie that explores some very heavy subject matter, and almost but not quite gets its own premise. Most of the people who are irrationally angry with the film have never seen it, and probably won’t for fear of being turned gay, or worse: liberal.

        • HandwovenConsensus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I liked that it at least gave a few nods to the idea that living in a patriarchy isn’t necessarily great for all men either. Not all men have power, and even the ones that do aren’t necessarily happier for it and find themselves competing with other men and restricting their own self-expression. That’s a nuance that’s lost in a lot of pop feminist messaging.

          • betheydocrime@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Absolutely! The dolls of both genders that were discontinued or discarded were the first ones to bring down the patriarchy in Barbie land, including Allan and Sugar’s Daddy/Magic Ring Ken

        • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Exactly the way actual feminism does instead of the conservative boogeyman “feminism” that’s just female chauvinism espoused by an extreme minority.

        • littlewonder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          There are only two categories: the status quo (no matter how shitty it might be for some populations) and “political”.

      • mashbooq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s only political if you think human rights are political. For normal people who care about other people, it’s a light hearted comedy

        • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Human rights are political by definition. Feminism is political by definition. That the average person (or at least the ones worth knowing) is a feminist, whether they know it or not, doesn’t mean the ideas aren’t political in nature.

          The problem is that people think political means bad or controversial instead of, you know, relating to concepts of governance and self rule.

        • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          The fact that I don’t want to go to the movies to watch propaganda doesn’t mean I’m against that propaganda. I go there to be entertained.

          • dangblingus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            You didn’t reply to their comment, you just added your own idiotic take. The movie isn’t propaganda unless you think a story about women and men having equal rights and equal opportunity is propaganda.

            Is The Matrix propaganda? Is Terminator propaganda? Is Star Trek propaganda? All entertaining movies, all have heavy social commentary.

            • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              Those are all propaganda, the problem is people use propaganda to mean lies when it means information and ideas disseminated to impact public opinion.

              So, you know, basically all art and every intellectual pursuit.

            • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              I haven’t seen the Barbie movie. I have no idea what it’s like. My comment was about “propaganda” movies in general

          • Torvum@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            You’ll get nothing from communists in this discussion friend. People refuse to allow our media to be escapism anymore and demand even already addressed issues drilled into ‘entertainment’. We traded pop culture references for this, and somehow I want the references back

            • dangblingus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              EvErYoNe WhO dIsAgReEs WiTh Me Is A cOmMuNiSt. You’re not even aware at how much of a self-report you’re doing.

            • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              The Barbie movie is still escapism, media in general is still escapism. Media has always contained messages or lessons or political meaning, it’s not a new thing, nobody’s disallowing anything. If you don’t like today’s media, maybe it’s because you don’t like the messages they contain anymore. Sometimes you gotta look inward before blaming things on “society”.

              • Torvum@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                It’s my opinion that thematic messages presented now are overt, with little nuance, and hold the same level of failure to look inward biases you claim. There is no discussion to be had when you hold a meeting with strawmen.

                Great writers and media of the past were lauded for holding something that is presented as a moral evil up to caliber in logic and presentation. Taking a threat seriously so to speak. Look at an instance like Metal Gear, where despite the intent and presentation saying warmongering is bad, the writers still had the wherewithal to gauge a reasonable position you’d face fighting that ideology. You aren’t meant to agree with Zero or the Patriots or BB. But you can see and understand their logic to lead these actions.

                What is this but taking a child’s doll and using it to spew word vomit level rhetoric that focuses on buzzwords and failed symbolism than actually addressing anything core to the point. If you want to make some preaching movie do it. But when you market your film as a lighthearted romp of self discovery involving an inanimate object, don’t be shocked when people push back.

                • dangblingus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  Ahhhhhhh, so you do have a point to make. It took this entire thread for you to share it with us, and it was after it was heavily implied that you’re too much of a social conservative to enjoy art, which I still believe is the case. Did you get all of your talking points from The Critical Drinker? Also, your comparison of Barbie to MGS3 is apples to oranges. Highlighting complicated characters such as Zero and the Patriots doesn’t negate any of the heavy-handedness Kojima is also known for, and it certainly isn’t a compelling argument that the Barbie movie is without nuance or merit.

      • spiderjuzce@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        If it’s talking about equality then it’s not political. People’s lives are not political they are not objects for other people to react to. Touch grass.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Some people do.

        Just like some people genuinelly believe the Earth is Flat and some people will have no problem drinking their own piss on a dare.

        And then beyond those weirdos there’s an entire subculture of weirdos out there whose wierdness is to pay massive attention to and rage all about what weirdos do and, worse, they’re divided into factions and they’ll feed-on and feed-out weirdo rage between factions, so it doesn’t take much to trigger them into a positive feedback cycle of weirdo raging about weirdos.

        The secret here is to remember that although they are often loud and lacking self-restraint on the Internet, all those weirdos (in all factions as well as factionless) still add up to a minority of people.

      • ZzyzxRoad@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s very obvious here that no one is saying “if you don’t like a Barbie movie then you’re sexist.” The point is if you don’t agree with equality, whether in a movie or irl, then that’s the problem. But I feel like you probably already know this.

        But yes, if people from certain religions and political parties would just stop with the racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, and xenophobia, maybe people wouldn’t feel the need to express cultural values the oppression they’re experiencing. Maybe consumers wouldn’t identify so much with the message of films like this. Yet somehow it’s always positive media like this that gets pushback, and meanwhile, laws keep getting passed in bumfuck states that are stripping human rights from people one by one. But sure, Barbie is the “exhausting” issue here.

        In other words, maybe there wouldn’t be media “pushing” for equality if we already had it.

        And idk, I find Marvel/superhero bullshit to be exhausting and immature and just bad, so I don’t watch any of it, I block everything about it on lemmy and reddit, and I don’t comment on it. Then it’s not exhausting anymore.

    • zeroxxx@lemmy.my.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      People are free to be mad at anything as they please as long as they dont harm to other people.

      Or maybe people should not be mad at news article of Russia invading Ukraine for no reason?

  • tenitchyfingers@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Correct. Honestly, if a dude gets offended by a movie that says “hey dude, learn how to love and value yourself without basing all of your sense of self on your romantic relationship to a woman and you’ll be much happier”, they are NOT a catch at all and they need to shed some shit about their lives.

  • •••@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    That’s interesting. I read that the film was about radical feminism, but gender switched with Ken as the feminist to overthrow the Barbie-dominating system. Really look forward to seeing the movie.

    • Dark_Blade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Same, I just can’t bring myself to care about a movie that’s about toys I have zero nostalgia for.

      • dditty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I had no prior experiences with any Barbie-related products or media (adult cis white male in the US) and wasn’t sure whether I’d enjoy it at all. After seeing it, i honestly think there’s something for everyone in this movie. It’s exceptionally well-written (very wry) and makes solid points about the current state of patriarchy in our society. It’s really well-done. Feel free to wait for it to come out on streaming, but then I’d definitely recommend checking it out.

          • MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            I feel you, but if the movie shows any type of struggle against power, it is probably a more universal theme than what we percieve , especially here in the US, its probably just not that great of a movie otherwise, but with a relatable message. I have zero interest in seeing it, but now that it’s become this culturally charged, I feel I must.

            • Dark_Blade@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              Eh, I don’t particularly care how ‘culturally charged’ it is, nor do I feel like forcing myself to watch something for a reason like that. I just don’t care enough about Barbie for it to be worth it.

              • MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                Yea that’s fair, and tbh, the way I live my day to day, I probably won’t end up ever seeing it. Lol

      • MajorHavoc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Heh. I feel like they would need to discontinue the toys before any of us get a chance to develop nostalgia.

        I’m not nostalgic for Hot Wheels either. I just go buy a Hot Wheel when I want one.

        • RavenFellBlade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Bruh… Transformers have been in almost continuous production in one for or another since 1993. They were briefly discontinued in the late 80s and early 90s, and were brought back with the Generation 2 line and then Beast Wars. The longest period that Transformers haven’t been on the market since their introduction to the US market was between Generation 1 and Generation 2 from 1990-1993. Generation 2 fizzled in 1995, and was replace a little over a year later in 1996 with Beast Wars. Since then, the brand has had some continuous shelf presence.

          And it’s a huge brand today that is largely sold to adult collectors with an attachment to whichever show or comic they indulged in as a kid. Yes, discontinuation can definitely drive nostalgia and a desire to collect something, but it isn’t a necessity. In the case of Transformers, it’s just created an ever-widening pool of things for new adult collectors to be interested in. Right now, there’s a growing interest in modern updates of the Unicron Trilogy characters (Armada/Energon/Cybertron), which were shows being aired from 2002-2005, followed by Transformers Animated and the Michael Bay films.

          • MajorHavoc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Good summary.

            I’m just bitter that Barbie and Hot wheels fans didn’t have their favorite toy pulled from the shelves between the late 80s and early 90s.

            And Action Masters weren’t really Transformers, and everyone knew it.

            • RavenFellBlade@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              Action Masters were hot garbage. Especially since some of them managed to somehow have even less articulation than their original transforming counterpart, which is saying something.

    • DrM@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Why wouldnt it? It’s also cool if you dislike the movie, it’s not cool if you dislike female directors “because of this movie”

    • Eccitaze@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Honestly I was the same way going into it, and after watching it my thoughts were “I don’t regret watching it, but I wouldn’t have regretted missing out either.”

      The movie is great, and there were multiple moments where I burst out laughing. It’s also a really bizarre acid trip, and I mean that in a good way! But at the end of the day, it’s a hot pink version of The Lego Movie, down to Will Farrell playing a (less evil and more well-meaning) Lord Business. It’s a movie made by women, for women, about a series of toys designed for women. That’s not a bad thing by any means, and it’s not like men cannot enjoy it, but it also means it may not interest you, and that’s fine too.

      • LengAwaits@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Is it really as critical of capital as The Lego Movie was? I haven’t seen it yet, though I intend to.

        Fox Business, among other right-wing news outlets, were foaming at the mouth about how The Lego Movie was anti-capitalist. Search up “Lego movie anti capitalist” on your preferred search engine to see what I mean.

        • Eccitaze@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Mmmmm, I don’t think I’d go that far, no. Feminist? Very much so. Unable to decide if the Mattel executives are actually antagonistic because Mattel didn’t want to make themselves look too bad? Probably.

    • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      “If you love barbie you’ll love the movie!”

      “If you hate barbie you’ll love the movie!”

      Idgaf about barbie so I didn’t bother watching.

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      The only reason I have any interest in it is all the conservative jimmy-rustling it’s doing.

    • Ado@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Of course. I don’t care for Barbie either, and never played with the toys during childhood so there’s no connection for me. I went to watch with my fiance because it was something she was interested in. The movie was okay. Wasn’t great, wasn’t horrible. I think when it becomes telling is when people are somehow offended or pretend like it’s the worst movie created.

    • trainsaresexy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      My interest in upbeat movies has never been very high. If it were a thriller or mystery that’d be cool. I’d watch. It’s ok we can pass on this one.

  • dangblingus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Someone tell me gf that I’m a normal guy with normal values and stable emotions please. She doesn’t believe me.

  • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    It is in my very unbiased opinion that is totally not a promotion (as that would be against strike rules) that everybody should see this movie.

    Multiple times.

  • Psyduck_world@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I thought the movie criticizes both extreme feminism and male chauvinism, or did I watch a different Barbie movie?

    • erin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I take slight issue with your phrasing. “Extreme feminism” isn’t an issue, that’s like saying extreme racial equality is an issue. Feminism isn’t about female superiority, it’s about gender equality. The movie does not criticize extreme feminism, it criticizes chauvinism, whether male or female.

      • duffman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        When your definition of feminism is “gender equality”, you’re right, there’s no such thing as an extreme. When you take the equity stance and start treating people as groups and funding/defunding one group or the other you are building up new systems of discrimination instead of breaking them down.

      • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        “Extreme feminism” isn’t an issue, that’s like saying extreme racial equality is an issue.

        There was a time during the 2010s when third-wave feminism was pushing things too far and trying to create divisive splits on subjects that really didn’t need them, like Atheism+ and a bunch of other things with a plus sign tacked on to it. Fortunately, once the #MeToo movement picked up speed, they switched gears to more important things.

        So, yes, you can have an extreme view on anything, even feminism.

    • kraftpudding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah. Barbie Was not the good guy in the Barbie movie, right? Like, even in the end they admit that they will not give the Kens true equality, just enough that they basically won’t revolt again. People here calling Barbie a feminist icon, what movie were you watching?

      • friendlymessage@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I think that was the point, it’s the perfect mirror to the real world. Everyone not okay with how the Barbies treat the Kens in the end should think for a second why that is and why anyone should accept the reverse in the real world.

        • HandwovenConsensus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          It’s also kind of a clever subtle call to action. “If you don’t like this ending, you can change it by changing things in the real world.”

      • Lanthanae@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        “Stereotypical Barbie” (the Margot Robbie one) actually seems to get it by the end. In fact, her main character arc was going from being like the other barbies—watered down stereotypes of feminism—to actually a feminist who has a better grasp of why just equalizing out positions of power, while still good, does not address the root of patriarchy.

        • ikiru@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Okay, I’ll admit I had not the slightest clue what the plot was to Barbie before opening this post but I’m getting a little curious about this movie now.

      • Naia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        That’s the point. They blatantly say “someday, the Ken’s will have as much rights as women do in the real world”

        The entire point is that treating people as second class like thst isn’t good, regardless of which side its coming from and that we should all be equal. The only time I’d see men complaining about that is when they don’t get it.

        • Bibliotectress@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          That line literally made my jaw drop because I had just been thinking, “Wow this is still kinda messed up. I thought their society would end up much more equal” and then BAM! that line hits. That movie was so good. I’ve been trying to get everyone I know to see it.

          • Lanthanae@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Same. I was thinking the exact same thing at that point. A massive part of the movie’s message hinges on that line and I smiled so wide when I heard it because it clicked much of the rest of the film into place.

      • T4V0@lemmy.pt
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Like, even in the end they admit that they will not give the Kens true equality, just enough that they basically won’t revolt again.

        That example isn’t really accurate, they say the Kens eventually will be given the same representativity as the women in the real world. That line is more of a jab against gender inequality than anything.

        • kraftpudding@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Yeah. I would not take it that literally. I’d say it means they’re gonna do to Kens what “the patriarchy” and many people who support it do to women. Concede rights when they absolutely have to and begrudgingly accept them for the sake of avoiding bigger problems, but still believe in their own supremacy and acting one way while publicly pretending to be accepting of feminism. Then they will say, see, you have all this rights and equality now, no need for “Keninism” anymore and slowly start to backslide and undermine those rights when they feel like they can.

          They’re rather copying the spirit of real world patriarchy than just plainly introducing the same laws as it

        • TheDankHold@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Sure but it’s still them making a conscious choice to keep oppressing a group until an unrelated reality fixes their shit. Doesn’t sound like they’re good guys at all tbh.

          • Lanthanae@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Yeah the movie doesn’t paint them as good guys though? The narrator comes in and states that they aren’t at that point, and stereotypical Barbie leaves because she can’t see herself as taking part in such a system anymore.

          • T4V0@lemmy.pt
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Sure but it’s still them making a conscious choice to keep oppressing a group until an unrelated reality fixes their shit.

            I hope you see the irony in that phrase.

            Doesn’t sound like they’re good guys at all tbh.

            This isn’t Star Wars my dude, not everything needs to be good vs evil. Sometimes there’s even room for satire.

          • Mugly12@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            But even though the women have the control, they do not oppress men like men do to women in the real world. Men still do everything they want, even if the women have the power because the women make the world amazing for everyone. A little different from reality.

              • new_acct_who_dis@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                It’s not that they’re homeless, it’s just that where they live isn’t important to the story. This is because when little girls play with Ken dolls, they don’t give Ken any backstory. Kens are only there for supporting Barbie’s journey.

      • teft@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Obviously she wasn’t the good guy. She developed a nuclear bomb for heaven’s sake. To be fair I did fall asleep for a bit but I’m pretty sure I got the big plot points.

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Lmfao what the actual fuck?

          I didn’t watch the movie, nor do I know anything about the premise, so seeing that comment and thinking about Barbie the toy is absolutely hilarious…

      • boredtortoise@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        It didn’t end up in a world that’s ready. More like a mirror of the real world but maybe healthier?

    • IceMan@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      That is indeed what is in Barbie - if you watch it and actually think about the themes. If you’re just there for the experience then the message is (quote moviegoer behind my back discussing with friends): “goddamn, this is a step in right direction, we won’t change this patriarchal world with one film however“ :P

      On a basic level the message “Ken was silly, broke Barbieworld because he wanted to emulate men, they had to get Barbie and a feminist back to fix it” - and that’s what most people will get out of Barbie.

      • whatsarefoogee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        On a basic level the message “Ken was silly, broke Barbieworld because he wanted to emulate men, they had to get Barbie and a feminist back to fix it”

        How did he break it? He basically just flipped the genders so Kens are the ruling/working class and Barbies are just subservient eye candy. Barbie just flipped it back. It’s a broken and unimaginably unfair world in either case.

        When Kens ask just for a bit of equality at the end, they are shut down and given some unimportant appeasement as a joke.

        • new_acct_who_dis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          When Kens ask just for a bit of equality at the end, they are shut down and given some unimportant appeasement as a joke.

          The movie is calling this out on purpose. It’s how women are currently treated in western society.

    • boredtortoise@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      That’s what the article is saying as well.

      Any gendered chauvinism sucks and patriarchy causes suffering to anyone.

      And if someone comes out of the movie angered by this knowledge, they can be a troublesome person to other people.

      • Chetzemoka@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I don’t think that’s the feminism that the movie was criticizing, but rather the commodified “girl boss feminism” that holds up conventionally beautiful commercial attainment as the ultimate aspirational icon.

        As opposed to the feminism of intersectionality and respect for the rights and choices of normal, everyday women.