“The 155-year-old Campbell Soup Company plans to drop “soup” from its corporate name, rebranding as The Campbell’s Company. More consumers are reaching for snacks and ditching ready-to-serve soups, and the company has bought up other food lines to grab them.”

  • over_clox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    As long as they don’t take their V8 vegetable juice or other staple products off the shelves or change their original recipes, I see no problem with this.

    • faltryka@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Mmm a fellow v8 lover I see. I could drink gallons of that salty goodness if left alone near the fridge.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I dunno, disconnecting from history might be a problem. It might be good for them to be reminded that, however big and conglomerate they get, they started as a humble soup company.

      It would be like if Ford rebranded as “FMC”, how long would it take for the corporate memory to forget Henry Ford was a real person?

      • over_clox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        They’re still keeping the original family name as Campbell’s though. They’ve just diversified enough that soup isn’t the only thing they make, and they don’t want their customers to think the only thing they make is soup anymore.

        I dunno, makes sense to me.

        We could go on into other company and product renaming done for other reasons. Aunt Jemima never hurt anyone…

        • Nougat@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Aunt Jemima never hurt anyone…

          Well …

          The name was derived from minstrel shows in the late nineteenth century, specifically from a song called “Old Aunt Jemima.” Minstrel shows, which were popular in the 19th and 20th centuries, were racist performances done by black-faced white men. In these degrading enactments, men would imitate “mammies,” which were enslaved Black women who cared after a white family and were portrayed to be content in this submissive state.

          https://www.hercampus.com/school/mcmaster/truth-behind-ain-t-yo-mama-aunt-jemima/

          I believe “Aunt Jemima” is a reworking of “ain’t your mama.”

          • over_clox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            Hmm… interesting. Thanks for sharing. 👍

            Now can someone explain why they renamed Cracker Jacks to Cracker Jills, with a cartoon black girl as their new mascot?

            Like seriously, couldn’t they have the respect to call it Caramel Jills? Why they gonna call her a cracker?

            https://youtube.com/shorts/V3wVWkl-39U

            • Nougat@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              We created Cracker Jill® to help increase the representation of girls and women in sports and to provide funding to fuel their sports endeavors and dreams.

              https://www.crackerjill.com/faqs

              “Cracker Jack has been part of sports for over a century, as records were made and rules changed. We’ve been so inspired by how girls and women are changing the face of the game, so in this spirit we introduce Cracker Jill to show girls that they’re represented even in our most iconic snacks.”

              https://www.pennlive.com/life/2022/04/frito-lay-introduces-cracker-jill-version-of-cracker-jack-to-celebrate-women-in-sports.html

              And they didn’t rename Cracker Jack. They added Cracker Jill. It’s still the same product regardless of the packaging, just with more representation.

              • over_clox@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                And? Cracker Jill? How about Caramel Jill instead?.. 🤔

                Sorry, but I don’t think their marketing department really thought that one through. I mean hell, it’s a caramel covered snack!