WITAF.

At best, he doesn’t understand what a Hybrid Car is.

  • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Broken clocks and whatnot. Hydrogen cars are trash and completely unfeasible, not because they explode but because of the terrible efficiency and fueling problems

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      And would need a huge new infrastructure for production and distribution. I’m convinced that most of the push for hydrogen is from oil and gas interests wanting to have essentially the same business they do now.

      Clearly one of the advantages of EVs is how cheap and easy the infrastructure is compared to any other alternative (and somehow we’re still finding it difficult)

      • Zron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        EV infrastructure would be better if it was actually standardized and regulated to be like gas stations.

        Right now, we have legacy charging ports and the new, now standard, Tesla port. So you have to make sure the charger will even fit your car. And, because we live in the future, everything is enshitified. Different charging companies have different apps that you need to download to pay for charging, many chargers are down for maintenance, but even with the app, there’s no guarantee you’ll be warned about the charger being down.

        Chargers should be like gas pumps. Put in a card, put the plug in your car, and then wait for it to charge. Every plug should fit every car. The system that sprang up without government intervention is clearly insufficient, and needs to be standardized from the ground up.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago
          • Most manufacturers pledged to support NACs starting next year, and a couple already have. Also, Tesla is adding the older standard to at least some chargers
          • We might be losing “pay at the pump”, that was required for federal money to build out charging. Now we’re switching to NACs but Tesla hasn’t supported “pay at the pump” and I don’t know if that’s still a requirement. While it is actually more convenient to use the app and Tesla has been consumer friendly so far, I’m uncomfortable with yet another app holding my credit card hostage just so I can adult.
          • we should focus on rest areas on highways, both to build out the trip charger network and as something that can more easily be standardized/influenced
      • this_1_is_mine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        To add to that the system’s handling them degrade quite quickly if you think maintenance cost for a normal vehicle is difficult you should see one that has to handle high pressure hydrogen

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      and the need to build an entire new distribution network, but one that handles cryogenic fuel.

      nah, no thanks.

      • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        Actually they can retro fit oil and gas infrastructure to work with hydrogen. Guess who is pushing the “huRdUGyun iS thE fuTuRe” narrative. Yeah the people who own the oil and gas infra.

        • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Actually they can retro fit oil and gas infrastructure to work with hydrogen.

          citation requested because this defies literal physics. I’d give you the benefit of the doubt if you suggested propane, but gasoline storage is NOT cryogenic, would not hold large enough volumes of it, and aren’t capable of the pressures involved.

          Sure, you can bury a hydrogen tank and support plumbing NEXT to a gasoline storage tank, but you still have to deal with handling cryogenic fuel. Do they really claim that?

          So even if that’s an agenda, it’s fucking bent. Green Hydrogen literally ISN’T.

          Seems like every solution the petroleum industry pushes is really just another excuse to pump more oil to burn in an already choking atmosphere.

          fuuuuuck.

    • chaogomu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Hydrogen fuel cells actually show quite a bit of promise. Mostly for large trucks. Batteries have a scaling issue. A battery powered 18-wheeler needs a much larger battery for a much shorter range.

      Adding more load means you need more battery, and that larger battery is just more load that you need to haul.

      This is sort of true with everything, but the important note is that a full battery and empty battery weigh the same.

      Anyway. Commercial use is where it makes sense. There are actually a few other technologies that make sense in the commercial transportation space. Like ammonia.

      Keeping these rather dangerous fuels commercial also allows for more strict safety standards.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      But nobody’s actually taking about subsidising or making them, so there’s no point in ranting about it.