• index@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    there’s the red team. Burn through our fossil resources with reckless abandon. War, war, war, and more war.

    The blue team is doing the same thing: burning through fossil resources in the name of war. The military complex doesn’t stop or change when blue or red are elected.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_support_for_Israel_in_the_Israel–Hamas_war

    I encourage you to keep studying and researching. Politics isn’t a football match where teams compete against each others and “left” and “right” are two buzzwords.

    https://archive.org/details/lawauthorityanar00kropuoft/page/n5/mode/2up

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I encourage you to keep studying and researching. Politics isn’t a football match where teams compete against each others and “left” and “right” are two buzzwords.

      No offense but I think OP has a better grasp of this than you do

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          You’re acting like that’s the only policy point that exists. There are meaningful differences in other areas. I don’t have enough non-propagandized information to argue for sure that there are differences in the middle east war department, but the parties certainly aren’t the same on all war-related matters (see Ukraine/Russia as an example). Their rhetoric is different for the middle east but again I can’t speak for their actions. And obviously their non-war policies are drastically different.