Important excerpt:
“Introducing a scanning application on every mobile phone, with its associated infrastructure and management solutions, leads to an extensive and very complex system. Such a complex system grants access to a large number of mobile devices & the personal data thereon. The resulting situation is regarded by AIVD as too large a risk for our digital resilience. (…) Applying detection orders to providers of end-to-end encrypted communications entails too large a security risk for our digital resilience”.
Too bad politicians don’t have to base their decisions on an expert opinion. Any credible person will answer that this is a bad idea, but the issue is “easy and quick solutions to difficult problems”.
They’ll just du what they did before - “Our experts say: it’s perfectly safe and secure. No we won’t tell you the names of our experts to protect their privacy and personal safety”
Every time you have a child that’s abused, you have a child that’s abused.
Seems like the solution to this is the normal ways we deal with child abuse: social workers and school counsels.
Failed laws don’t stop libre software. Let them backdoor themselves.
No thanks. I have a business, and I don’t want to be fined for using software thats protected from backdoors.
they should force WhatsApp/Apple/Signal/Telegram to scan all our private messages
Average person: “Fuck right off.”
for suspected child sexual abuse material (CSAM)
Average person: “OH WELL I GUESS IT’S OKAY THEN.”
That’s why average person sucks, average person doesn’t even care about politics and falls for corrupts’ tricks easily
Removed by mod
I guess the real predators are the companies who make those surveillance systems
