• PoopingCough@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Which is exactly why I called my local election office, and I even mentioned it might have been because of the rain we were having, but I was told no, it wasnt the damp that caused it because they had confirmed with the factory that sent the ballots out that some had been sent out like that. They then told me to tape it and when I was hesitant because I had the same thought as you they told me they had checked several times with the registrar that taping them up was what to do. They said it was a known issue so it would be accepted.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        This and the original Op image are why I refuse to do absentee/mail in voting.

        Theres just so many ways it can be fucked with, and potentially handwaved away. Especially at an institutional level in the less reputable coughconservativecough states.

        Mail in ballot used to be fine, and safe, and secure… but 8 years of fucking domestic political terrorism/usurpation/insurrection/etc have kicked that out the door, down the stairs, into the street and infront of the bus.

        I don’t care what I have to do, what sacrifices I have to make, and what I have to endure.

        I’m voting in person this election, cause its too important not to.

        and everyone else should too.

        Cause in person voting is the only way to minimize the fuckery they can pull.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Another way is to discourage people from early voting and then lose some percentage who end up not voting on election day either.

          You’re not wrong. I’ll be voting in person for this reason. But if you’re not 100% sure you’ll make it on election day, vote early. Preferably do it in person.

          Some votes will likely count more than others.

          • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            Yep. Increase the need for in-person voting, decrease the amount of voting locations, have armed republican “volunteers” patrolling places, and then see how many people are willing to wait hours with armed right-wing militants eyeballing whether your glasses make you a “libtard.”

            I have no statistical evidence to back this up, but my gut feeling is that the aggregate of all the voting fuckery, election board fuckery, voting laws fuckery might end up be worth as much as 3-5% in battleground states. There’s no statistical model that accounts for the illegal/quasi-legal voter suppression and disenfranchisement efforts.

            All polls assume that everyone that can vote and intends to vote will get to vote and that their vote will be counted and that the counted votes will be accurately reported. That’s a serious blind spot in election polling. And since the Republicans have been screaming that elections are fraudulent because of democratic/immigrant fantasies for four full years, when legitimate fraud can and does occur, no Democrat will be able to say it loud enough that it matters.

        • CM400@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I mean sure, I pretty much agree with you, but…

          There were so many fucking trumpers hanging out at the parking lot of my voting site last time, I don’t want to be (or for my family to) around that shit.

          • medgremlin
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            9 hours ago

            A lot of states have places for early in-person voting. You might have to drive a bit of a distance, but it allows for in-person voting in a less chaotic environment.

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              7 hours ago

              You might have to drive a bit of a distance, but it allows for in-person voting in a less chaotic environment.

              And thus we see how voter intimidation at polling places on election day is still effective even with early voting, since it skews towards people with cars/the means to get to the early-voting locations.

              • medgremlin
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 hours ago

                I agree with you completely, but I wanted to make people aware that the option exists in case they are able to make use of it. A solution that helps some people but not others is better than a complete lack of a solution.

          • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 hours ago

            IT was like that in 2016 for me.

            I shouldered my way through anyway. They are stupid, but they aint complete fucking morons. They know starting shit at an election venue is a good ticket to federal pound-them-in-the-ass prison.

        • Match!!@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 hours ago

          nah my state rules and doesn’t have this shit going on. remember to check that your ballot is received and recorded after you vote either way

        • TonyOstrich@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Even during Covid I felt a similar way. My “compromise” has been in person early voting. It’s pretty much always dead when I go in and is very quick. I don’t think I have actually voted on election day in over a decade.

    • Chip_Rat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 hours ago

      …what…

      How can an election office accept envelopes that have been tampered with? Call them back and record the answer, then call local news, blast them on every social media you have, put a crazy persons handwritten sign in your window about it, whatever it takes. The person who said they would accept envelopes that had been cut and taped just admitted they will accept votes that may have been tampered with…

      • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        If the election results aren’t to their liking, these will be easy votes to start kicking out. And then the votes that are doubled through provisional voting, i.e., voting in person as well as mail-in in order to be sure your vote was counted.

        It won’t matter if they’re counted correctly in the end. The point will be to immediately kill off democratic votes, create as much chaos as possible, declare victory, and when the dust settles, the republican, right-wing national network of fast-response staff, politicians, lawyers, and friendly judges that they’ve been preparing for four years while democrats did basically nothing will have effectively taken the election by force. SCOTUS already made a decision that will allow them to effectively decide this election. So the right-wing ideologues already have local, regional, state, and national plans that extend all the way to the highest court in the land.

        And the Democrats have “but that’s not fair.”