• PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    Just like choosing not to brush your teeth doesn’t change the necessity of dental hygiene

    choosing to vote third party isn’t ignoring reality

    You’re so close to getting it. Millimeters away.

      • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Yeah, for Trump. Because that’s what a vote for Jill Stein is.

        Your refusal to accept reality in circular logic does not make you correct.

        • geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          No, they’re voting for Pro-Israel candidate Rachele Fruit. Quoted earlier this year:

          And anyone who is interested in reading and learning about the history of Hamas will be convinced that it’s not about liberation. It’s about genocide against the Jews.

        • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          2 months ago

          No, a vote for Trump is a vote for Trump. A vote for Stein is a vote for Stein.

          I’ve already voted. And I didn’t vote for Stein. Or Trump. Or Harris. Thank you! :)

              • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Argumentum ad populum logical fallacy: being popular doesn’t make you correct. And obviously not many really think that, or Stein would actually be a viable candidate.

                Once again, Your refusal to accept reality does not make you correct. And, by the numbers, it doesn’t make you popular either.

                • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  11
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  And obviously not many really think that, or Stein would actually be a viable candidate.

                  Well then you guys and the Democratic Party have nothing to worry about! Right? So no stress. Thank you! :)

                  • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago

                    How did you arrive at that conclusion? The facts don’t support it. Democrats were ever worried that Stein would be elected.

          • BertramDitore@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            You are simply wrong about this. Completely wrong, and blindly pretending you’re right. I pride myself on giving people as much benefit of the doubt as possible, but you appear to be willingly trolling now, or you are incapable of learning new concepts and ideas and understanding the consequences of your actions. It’s quite selfish and concerning actually. In any case, I’m done trying. If that was your plan, to tire us out of arguing against your complete lack of logic or willingness to understand reality, then you win. Just know, you’re still wrong about some very fundamental concepts of our society.