• archomrade [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      So your point about them using child soldiers is unrelated to your claim that they’re “killing children in large numbers”?

      Seemed like you were conflating the two, maybe I got that wrong.

      When you casually drop ‘genocide’ into a conversation without elaborating on who or what you’re talking about you’re likely to cause some confusion.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        The correct response is to start your question by apologizing for assuming you knew what I said.

        Too bad you didn’t bother doing that.

        Too late now too.

        • archomrade [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t think an apology is warranted when it’s apparent a claim is being made as a bad-faith deflection.

          Even if you had made a compelling case for your use of the word (you still haven’t), it’s still in response to someone pointing to a genocide that’s already happening. You could’ve just said ‘Houthis are evil because they are using child soldiers’ and we wouldn’t have anything to talk about (except maybe a debate over whether that changes the ethics of a US-Saudi backed genocide against them), but instead you said “Houthis are using child soldiers”, then “Killing children is a form of genocide”, and then chose not to elaborate any further, even when pressed.

          “It really seems like it to me” is about as satirical as dwight type-casting an italian-american as a mobster.