Allowing political party leaders or other private citizens to have people removed from the list of registered voters would move North Carolina “away from a democratic form of government,” a judge ruled in shooting down the Republican Party’s request.

The Republican Party has failed in its attempt to remove almost a quarter of a million North Carolina voters from the list of registered voters for this year’s elections. A federal judge shot down the party’s request Thursday, the same day early voting began.

The GOP had sought to purge about 225,000 voters, based on what they say are flaws in the voter registration system.

The lawsuit was based on two legal claims. Judge Richard Myers II, the chief district court judge for the Eastern District of North Carolina and an appointee of former Republican President Donald Trump, ruled against one claim and declined to rule on the other.

He said there’s no reason to believe that either judges or private citizens, including political party leaders, have any right to throw people off the voter rolls in North Carolina. State law explicitly gives that duty to elections officials — who months ago investigated allegations connected to the lawsuit and found nothing.

A ruling in favor of the GOP’s arguments, Myers concluded, could harm American democracy: It “would significantly alter the allocation of power … away from a democratic form of government,” he wrote, citing past legal precedent.


🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

  • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    1 month ago

    Why do none of these articles ever ask why the GOP waits until between 2 months and 2 weeks before an election to try and purge voters? Why aren’t they going through this process say a few months after an election where they have all the time in the world before the next one to get things in order? Why do they constantly try to have the courts make a ruling, bypassing the actual processes in place?

    We know the reason. The GOP wins when fewer people vote. If they can have a judge throw a quarter million voters out, that’s nearly the same as them gaining a quarter million votes. Also can have a knock on effect of people that were registered to vote, have been registered for years but for whatever reason are included in this group, try to vote on election day and get told they can’t. Or they vote provisionally and then have a GOP State AG go after them for voter fraud… that the party artificially created. Two for one there, fewer voters and they get the voter fraud they’re always screaming about without evidence. They can just make the evidence appear by illegally purging eligible voters close to elections.

  • Bone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    1 month ago

    Excuse me, I’d like to purge all voters in my state. Would you look at that, I win!

  • _bcron
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 month ago

    That’s cool but we really need to start looking at shit like this as intent to deprive people of their constitutional rights and charge them for such

    • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Agreed, but you need to prove intent to do that and the republicans always try to play this as improving the voting system rather than gaming it.

      • _bcron
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        They should stand before a jury of their peers and the jury should be allowed to hear both sides and come to a determination based on what had been presented to them.

        There’s enough credibility in the claim that they’re doing this in order to deprive citizens of their constitutional rights that I think they should stand trial and allow for a conclusion.

        Court is often where intent is decided

  • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I’d say the requests for purge should be made public. It then only takes a few of these people to go to court and sue the people making the purge requests.

    Hell I’d argue the government should be arresting these people making wholesale purge requests.

    Untill that time, purge requests must be done manually through a convoluted form on the site, proof must be provided in specific structure and format, an accompanying form must be filled in and an affadavit must be signed scanned and included for each.

    Edit: spellingz

  • x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    In my country it’s your duty as a citizen to go vote. (You can however vote blank.)

    I thought it was like this in every country.

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 month ago
    WRAL - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for WRAL:

    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
    Wikipedia about this source

    CourtListener - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for CourtListener:

    MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
    Wikipedia about this source

    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nced.213121/gov.uscourts.nced.213121.58.0.pdf
    https://www.wral.com/story/gop-officials-can-t-purge-225-000-voters-in-nc-trump-appointed-judge-rules/21678839/
    https://www.wral.com/story/in-bipartisan-vote-nc-elections-board-shoots-down-audit-force-allegations-of-election-violations/21375951/

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support