• NegativeInf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    30 days ago

    Because we’ve been arguing it should be at least 15 for 10 years, and inflation is a bitch and if federal minimum wage had tracked with inflation since it was implemented, it would be closer to 30 bucks an hour than to 15.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      30 days ago

      And it should be all at once. The instant it’s passed, $30/hr. None of us got eased into it when gas prices and grocery prices and rent and health insurance went up.

    • Bananigans@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      30 days ago

      I understand your sentiment, but if that’s your policy basis, you’d be asking for $10/hr instead of $15.

      Not necessarily a bad idea, I just wanted to know how that number was generated, because without that data, it’s not necessarily a good idea either.

        • Bananigans@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          30 days ago

          If you read the comments, it’s actually not. Inflation alone doesn’t account for pinning wages near $30, so that’s not really a good explanation given that it’s nonfactual. Even if he’s considering the living wage instead of historical minimums, $30 is still about 30% higher than what an average living wage would be. Is there some other consideration he has that I’m missing? I wouldn’t know without asking due to an unfortunate lack of psychic powers.

          Anyways, sorry I asked for the policy reasoning behind a policy position. It clearly offended many, I realize my mistake, and won’t bring that kind of nonsense around here again.