They can’t sell the $699 AI party trick that requires a $24 subscription so they slashed the price to $499. Unfortunately it’s still $500 too expensive for what’s worth.

Maybe at $10 someone could buy it as a Halloween costume prop and even pay a whole month of subscription just to show off the novelty

  • overload@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 days ago

    At what price point would this device be useful? Seems like the sort of device that was made to allow the company to be bought by Google/Microsoft/Meta.

    • lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’ll probably be a brick in a few months, when the company goes bankrupt and the servers it relies on get shut down. So even getting it for free would be too expensive.

    • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 days ago

      At what price point would this device be useful?

      given that it’s horribly bad at what it claims to do and was a fire risk? not even a zero point.

        • JCPhoenix@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah that’d be cool if the opened it up and recreate it as a platform for people to mess around with it. Like a rPi or Arduino or something. Because in it’s current form…pretty much useless. But you’re right; they’d have to drop that price point significantly and incentivize people even if it were open.

  • DdCno1@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    Bit late, isn’t it? I had already forgotten all about it and I don’t think I’m the only one.

    • Toribor@corndog.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      If it was free and I just had to pay the subscription I’d think “Can’t my phone already do all this?”

      • Moonrise2473@feddit.itOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        You phone doesn’t have the low-res laser projector gimmick that is invisible in daylight, runs extremely hot and drains the battery in one hour

        • gradyp@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          truth be told, the only reason I would be even remotely interested in the device is the stupid laser projector. Seems like that might be fun to play with.

          • DdCno1@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Yes! I remember experiments with similar projectors and interfaces like this device going back at least as far as the early 2010s. Would be fun to mess with.

  • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve never heard of this thing, is it supposed to do what the analyze this picture or ID the song playing features of my phone already could do, or is there something novel I’m missing?