• Hiko0@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      There‘s nothing comparable on the market at this size and price when it comes to sheer power and energy efficiency.

      • nomous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        5 hours ago

        $600 gets you 16GB of RAM and 256GB of storage. You can get better hardware for less.

        • lud@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Have you factored in the processing power and the cost of an equivalent processor?

        • kibiz0r
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Is there even a better ARM SoC? All I know of is the Snapdragon X Elites, which are either on par or slightly below the M4. And you can only get them in a laptop form factor at this point, cuz they cancelled the mini-PC dev kit.

    • kibiz0r
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      M4 reportedly outperforms Intel’s Core i9-14900KS by 16%. That CPU alone is over $600.

      • Jrockwar@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I don’t think anything with the word “intel” can be taken seriously in value comparisons…

        When I got my last laptop I ended up with a MBP because there were no high end options for Linux laptops with AMD. Now the options are better, but back then, the only realistic alternative to a MacBook Pro would have had a third of the real-world battery life if not less, even if I decided to spend £3k. That didn’t seem like an acceptable compromise so there were virtually no laptops in existence that could compete with an M2 MBP.

        • kibiz0r
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          True. It was just the first comparison I saw when I searched for M4 benchmarks.

          Really, AMD isn’t even a fair comparison because we’re talking about an ARM SoC here. So maybe the Snapdragon dev kit that ultimately got cancelled?

          It was supposed to be $900, for a special Snapdragon X Elite, 32GB RAM, and 512GB SSD.

          cpubenchmark.net has comparisons to other X Elite chips, putting them pretty much on-par with the M4 or maybe just below it.

          With the same amount of RAM and storage in a Mac Mini, you’re talkin $1200. So, $300 premium for a device that’s maybe 2-8% better, has retail support instead of being a dev kit, and… well, actually exists. It’s not a slam dunk for the Mini, but it’s clearly not a rip-off either.

    • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Its not, you can build your own mini pc with a ryzen 9700X, more ram, more storage, and it would probrally cost less. In addition you wouldn’t be locked into the Apple ecosystem and you would be able to upgrade it.

      • kibiz0r
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Sure. And you can buy a dirt bike cheaper than an ATV. Yet people still buy ATVs.

        I’m not gonna do iOS dev or ML on a GMKtec no matter how cost-effective it is, just like I’m not gonna play x86 Windows games on a Mac even if I win a maxed-out unit in a giveaway.