Summary

Gender bias played a significant role in Kamala Harrisā€™s defeat, with many votersā€”often womenā€”expressing doubts about whether ā€œAmerica is ready for a female president.ā€

Some said they ā€œcouldnā€™t see her in the chair,ā€ or questioned if a woman could lead, with one even remarking, ā€œyou donā€™t see women building skyscrapers.ā€ Though some voters were open to persuasion, this often became a red line.

Oliver Hall, a Harris campaign volunteer, found that economic concerns, particularly inflation, also drove voters to Donald Trump, despite low unemployment and wage growth touted by Democrats.

Harris was viewed in conflicting ways, seen as both too tough and too lenient on crime, as well as ineffective yet overly tied to Bidenā€™s administration.

Ultimately, Hall believes that Trumpā€™s unique appeal and influence overshadowed Harrisā€™s campaign efforts.

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    Ā·
    4 days ago

    I think the main thing I can take away from this is Iā€™d be terrible at running a political campaign. I already knew that.

    While I can understand how more traditional conservative messages resonate with people, Trumpā€™s are outside my Overton window. I can see the mechanics of how it works, and I can empathize with people who feel like the current system is failing them, but not with those who feel like Trump is going to fix it.

    Iā€™m disappointed your comments are attracting downvotes. They are on-topic and well-reasoned.

    • Blackbeard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      Ā·
      4 days ago

      I appreciate your response and understand your conundrum. Itā€™s hard to make sense of this because his movement seems so abhorrent sometimes.

      Consider for just a moment, though, that the downvotes are proving to you exactly the argument Iā€™m trying to make. Iā€™m squarely on the left and despise Trump, but for years the left has cared more about being ā€œrightā€ and punishing people who disagree in life and online, than about being open to diverse people and opinions.

      I really hate to have to echo tired right-wing talking points, but the terminally online left is our single most toxic bloc, and they exert huge amounts of control over what topics and opinions are ā€œallowableā€ online. You get hammered with downvotes and shouted out of the room any time you even try to consider another perspective, even if you do it politely. I can see how someone looking in from the outside would start to doubt our sincerity in arguing for diversity and tolerance. Weā€™re an awfully intolerant lot, all things considered.

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        Ā·
        4 days ago

        Whatā€™s funny is Iā€™m not a part of the terminally online left. It would be hard to deny the terminally online part while posting on Lemmy, but I lean more libertarian than left. I voted for Gary Johnson in 2016. Now some reader here probably thinks Iā€™m a terrible person.

        Trumpā€™s 2016 election convinced me to compromise a lot and vote for team blue even if I had major differences of opinion of certain policies. His attempt to steal the 2020 election cemented that decision, as thatā€™s a long-term threat to the continued existence of democracy in America.