• Todd Bonzalez@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          Hey, we’ll still have the 2nd amendment until we give them a reason to take it away. I vote we give them a really good reason to want us disarmed, but that maybe also puts them in, you know, a position where they can no longer vote to take any more constitutional rights away.

    • frezik
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 days ago

      Maybe. The one thing that saves rational results right now is that the Supreme Court can’t possibly take every single case. They have to pick carefully for cases that will fuck things up the most.

    • frezik
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 days ago

      We keep trying, but they keep pulling both of those out like it’s settled fact.

  • ARk@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    12 days ago

    What’s the point of putting it up there if they don’t follow it?

    • abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      12 days ago

      Enforcing religiousity has little to do with morals and more to do with control. Look at any religious state and you will find not a moral state, but one that uses religion to control other people and enforce their power.

  • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 days ago

    I wish there was a word for what religion, specifically in the southern section of the US, is doing to children. Like a word that describes how they are… Let’s just say grooming them.

  • Yokozuna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    This was totally (in my humble opinion) service for someone who “donated” to the new governor before he got elected. It was one of the first things he did it felt like. LA is plagued with a cliqued up, corrupt political system basically since its inception. I’m just glad that this shit got shot down further up the line. These damn Christian nationalists are a huge problem for any forward momentum that gets traction in legislation and only drag us backwards it feels like.

        • Furball@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 days ago

          The constitution lays out certain things the government can’t say or do. One of those things is bring together church and state

        • frezik
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          A simple reading would be no.

          “Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press…”

          In the strictest sense, it only applies to acts of Congress. It doesn’t even apply to states. However, the 14th Amendment setup a framework for incorporating the federal constitution down to the states, including this. Freedom of speech has also been interpreted more broadly in general.