I wonder why religious conservatives are mostly synonymous with capitalism supporters ? I mean arent most religions inherently socialistic ? What makes conservatives support capitalism , despite not being among the rich?

  • BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Fox News. Televangelists. Trump.

    Religion can be a very positive tool to bring communities together and support one another, but capitalism means exploitation, and nothing’s easier to exploit than blind faith.

    • panCatE@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I wonder why would a person keep a rich persons interest over their own ? Free or affordable healthcare and college would be such a great help , and while the planet can support food and housing for all , many are deliberately kept hungry and homeless and that is rooted in corporate greed most of the times . Gulliblity at another level!

      • 007v2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        The guise that they will someday be the one with the boot, they don’t wanna miss their chance be be the very boot they lick. Propaganda is a powerful tool.

        • panCatE@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          I mean I know people who think that elon is making them rich coz their tesla shares jumped, and at the same time they dont want college to be affordable because they paid for it in whole ( tho these ppl are mostly boomers and older gen)

      • dmonzel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I wonder why would a person keep a rich persons interest over their own ?

        There’s no such thing as a poor Republican voter, just a temporarily embarrassed millionaire.

    • Dandroid@dandroid.app
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I agree with the other two. But I think it’s disingenuous to say Trump, because this behavior has existed since long before Trump was relevant in politics.

    • krayj@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Religion has been sucking the teet of conservative politics for a LOT longer than Fox News, Televangelist, and Trump have been around.

      It goes far deeper and is way more fundamental than those things.

      • BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I agree completely, but on the surface, those are the three biggest modern contributors.

        A lot of people’s “sincerely held” beliefs are only skin-deep, so surface-level agitators and misinformation peddlers do have a lot of power in our society. If they ceased to exist, I suspect a lot of the hatred and vitriol their followers spew would cease, as well - assuming an equally-evil replacement didn’t immediately rise.

        A lot of people are stuck in their stale echo chambers, and just getting a breath of fresh air could do them wonders.

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      While I 100% agree with you, I think you listed the symptoms rather than the root cause. Religious people have been supporting the Republican party well… religiously since as long as I can remember, well before Trump and Fox News.

      I think it’s something that the Republican party has specifically built their messaging around and then those things have grown out of it as a result. Someone posted a good article the other day about how politicians supporting segregation were able to manufacture a wedge issue (abortion) in the 70s to capture the religious vote, who didn’t see it as a religious issue until they were basically told it was.

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Because “conservative” isn’t an ideology, it’s a mindset. It’s based on the idea that the in-group is good, not because of what they believe but because of who they are. So because they are good, whatever they want is good. It does not matter if their wants are contradictory or hypocritical or irrational in any way. They define the parameters for what is worth preserving, and then anyone who wants to stop them is part of the out-group and therefore bad. The out-group is not bad because they hold bad positions. The out-group could change their positions, and they would still be bad becauae it is part of their identity.

    Conservatives also do not require any justification for their wants, but having a religious justification is like catnip. Because of the conservative mindset, they have no problem picking and choosing the religious beliefs that support what they want while ignoring or attacking the ones that don’t.

    • croix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      This is honestly an extremely weak take. Not going to start a debate with you, I’m not a conservative, but oversimplification and vilification does more harm than good.

  • Copernican@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Max Weber’s “The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism” goes into how protestantism cradled capitalist growth. But I think it’s a bit heavy handed to say folks support capitalist ideology. You don’t really support ideology. The ideology is what supports capitalism or is capitalism itself. But Protestantism is generally has individualistic beliefs. No longer does the clergy intermediate relation to God. Protestants believe individuals have a personal and individual relation to god. This sense of individualism can overlap with capitalist mentalities of individual success and profit.

    But I think your use of ideology is too vague and understanding of religion is too generalized. You really need to talk about particulars of specific religious beliefs and particulars of specific attitudes towards capitalism. There’s not much to really comment on with such broad and vague brushstrokes.

      • cerevant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        You will find that very often the scams, advice, self-help, doctrine, etc that draw these populations have one thing in common: if whatever it is doesn’t work, it is because you are doing it wrong, not because the guidance is bad. That’s why conservatives will defend the tax rates of people who have 5 orders of magnitude more wealth than they do - they believe that it is their own fault they aren’t rich, and that anyone can become rich if they just try hard enough. It is why religious conservatives will still attack birth control in the face of their own kids having unwanted pregnancies. It is why natural medicine people will defend their practices even after it sends them to the hospital. They are more willing to believe that they themselves are at fault than the principles they believe in.

    • panCatE@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Does not explain why do they support capitalistic policies , and this is not just in the US but other countries too!

      • swallowyourmind@geddit.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        It does.

        (You can say the same about existing socialist democratic policies, too.)

        It’s just indoctrination.

        People believe what they are taught, and relatively few questions anything seriously.

        The majority of people continue to believe the religion they were raised in.

        The majority of people believe in the economic system they were raised in.

        The majority of the world’s countries use mixes of capitalist & socialist policies (ie free-market economies with social safety net programs).

        So most people support capitalist free-market systems, and would say they are pro-capitalism.

        They also don’t want you to cut their retirement government program levels.

        And though most won’t claim to support socialism, they love firefighters or libraries or roads, and they can’t tell there’s no difference. Because they aren’t taught to question.

        And most don’t want to replace their existing systems with completely different systems. They just want them to provide better tesults and be less costly.

        Religion is most effective at converting those more inclined to believe propaganda & appeals to authority.

        So these dichotomies are even worse & more prevalent for the religious.

        Those people breed children of mostly similar sentiment. If raised capitalist, those religious children won’t question the obvious conflict. Their authorities tell them it’s ok.

        Their authorities may even modify the religion to fit the mold (ie Prosperity Gospel).

        The religious authorities who suggest questioning existing systems receive pushback from followers and the system itself when they encourage critical thinking regarding the conflicts of capitalism and religion.

        Examples include Martin Luther King Jr & the current Pope, both of whom were not well received with their criticisms of capitalism.

        So again, it is just indoctrination with a sprinkling of ignorance.

  • joel_feila@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    This is not a an easy answer. Part of it is Prosperity gospel. Basically what if god showed you who was righteous by making the righteous rich. Why are you not rich, because you are not righteous. It started in the early part of the 1900s and quickly moved to tevevalgelism, even back during the days of radio.

    Combine that with a string believe in the great man theory of his troy. Something right wing people are more likely to strongly believe in. Add to that a need for a social hierarchy that clears say “These are the better and by divine right they should rules and these are the lesser to be ruled over” you have a powerful mix. God is at the most top point of a hierarchy and below must be the best people, the real great men who will shape history. How so I tell who these great men are? The rich, if they are righteous then god will reward them with riches.

    Then add a very distinct American version of Christianity. If it the christian thing to do then America will do and if Amercia does then it must the christian thing to do. America is capitalist therefore it is christian to be a capitalist.

    These circles of logic all feed into the one conclusion of hyper christian national capitalism.

  • vlad@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    This isn’t how it is. But it’s how they see it. Again, this is from their point of view. Or at least, it’s what I heard from them.

    Capitalism is about self reliance, “pulling yourself up by bootstraps”, getting out there and making your own way with no higher power (as in humans) standing in your way. They see socialism as a government forcing people to give up their own hard earned gains to give to others. The difference with Christianity is because God is telling them to do it. If God tells you to go feed the poor, then it’s OK. If you choose to do it yourself, then it’s also fine. If the government wants to do it without promoting their religion, then it’s bad. Because you’re not doing it for God.

  • AttackBunny@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    @jungekatz all the other answers are far more nuanced, and explain a lot more detail, but the most simple answers to your question are 1. Propaganda and 2. Herd mentality/echo chamber thinking.