• invalid_name@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Yes, but only because the exotic phallus and scrotum piercings he has are designed to have a hypnotic effect. Then he grabs them while they’re dazed.

      • invalid_name@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        No, no. He’s in the child trafficking van with the kkk wrap. The really gaudy one. Can’t miss it.

        Honestly I don’t know how he drives it with that huge swastika obscuring the windshield.

  • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    55 minutes ago

    Misinformation laws can quickly get 1984-ish. In the US both political parties have different ideas on what’s true and what’s misinformation, I don’t really like the idea of criminalizing “misinformation” when the accepted narrative will change every 4-8 years.

    Edit: Surprisingly, this is now one of my most downvoted comments ever on Lemmy. Do you guys really want the government deciding what you can or can’t say online?

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      “can get” implies there’s examples of like misinfo laws becoming orwellian. I cannot find such examples. Laws that penalize people for knowingly lying for profit, clout, etc tend to curb bombastic discourse. These standards are common in defamation suits. Extending them to more media makes sense.

      What’s always orwellian is like anti terrorism laws where laws intended to curb oppositional rhetoric or groups become applied on large swaths of people.

      The actual laws they prosecuted Assange for, for instance were anti espionage laws if I recall.

    • imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Sure, and this one probably wasn’t great but also the article shows why there’s of course a valuable line

    • darthelmet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Yeah. To me the misinformation conversation just sounds like”why are the poors talking to each other instead of listening to US?”

      If we had a misinformation law in 2001, would it have applied to the news outlets or gov officials who were lying about the Iraq war?

      There is A real problem in how we sort out second hand evidence, it’s just that this problem didn’t magically start when social media became a thing and it won’t be fixed by returning authority to those same old institutions who were lying to us in the past.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    10 hours ago

    This what they want…

    Their real crimes to be drowned out by bullshit, so voters just write everything off as misinformation when it’s a Republican, but “proof” if it’s about a Dem.

    Funny headline tho

    • ZeroCool@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      This what they want…

      Their real crimes to be drowned out by bullshit, so voters just write everything off as misinformation when it’s a Republican, but “proof” if it’s about a Dem.

      Funny headline tho

      Peter Dutton is neither a Republican nor a Democrat, he’s an Australian politician.

      Funny comment tho

        • ZeroCool@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          It’s okay to just admit you don’t know who Peter Dutton is and also don’t even know enough about US politics to realize who is and isn’t part of American political discourse.

            • ZeroCool@slrpnk.netOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 hours ago

              I did…

              No, you didn’t.

              But I don’t think any interaction we have is going to be productive

              There’s something we can agree on. Bye bye now 👋

        • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          9 hours ago

          For someone that’s constantly in every US politics comments section talking shit, you don’t even know who is a US politician and who isn’t.