• Maetani@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    While there’s no doubt tires are bad for the environment, a quarter of all microplastics seems a lot, especially since plastic is everywhere. Gladly there’s a source for that claim, a link to tireindustryproject’s FAQ… Claiming that this number is a gross overestimation. What the fuck is this article? Is it supposed to be satire or something?

  • frankPodmore@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    This is also yet another reason SUVs are bad: bigger tyres, higher weight, more wear, more pollution.

    It’s also another reason to have lower speed limits: less friction, less wear, less pollution.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 hours ago

      You want trains because they are good for the environment.

      I want trains because chugga chugga choo choo.

      We are not the same.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      22 minutes ago

      A little asbestos never hurt nobody

      (Edit: Nvm. I just looked it up, brake pads no longer use asbestos, which is cool at least)

    • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Yes, though note that tire and road wear scale with the 4th power of the vehicle weight. If a person on a bicycle weighs 200 pounds and a person driving a car weighs 2000 pounds then the car is going to have roughly 10,000 times as much tire wear (and microplastic shedding) as the bike.

      Now consider that people on bikes can even weigh less than 200 pounds and cars can weigh far more than 2000 pounds (I heard of a recent electric SUV that weighs 8000 pounds) and it becomes clear that bicycles are a complete non-issue, relative to cars. An 8000 pound car is equivalent to 6.25 million 160 pound bicycle + rider pairings.

      Now consider the effects of 18-wheeler tractor tailors with a maximum weight upwards of 80,000 pounds. These things absolutely disintegrate their tires. If you’ve done any highway driving you’ve likely seen the shredded debris of tires on the shoulder of the road.

      Edit: as an addendum I’d like to note that electric vehicles tend to weigh a lot more than ICE cars, by upwards of 1000 pounds. This is one of the reasons I’m dismayed at the rush to EVs: it’s going to accelerate the microplastic problem even as it reduces CO2.

      • Infomatics90@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Yes i agree. I have never driven but have been i a car due to medical reasons, but have rode a bike and plan to bike again once im a weight that a bike can sustain (im 370 right now). ive seen thoese tire “husks” on the highway sometimes.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Geez, here is another issue for which we’ve known about for 40 or so years that requires “urgent Action” for the past 40 years already

    Wake me up when we finally do something

    • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Boomers have categorically chosen apathy in favor of their own self interests since 1970. By the late 90s, they were a wrecking ball.

      • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I disagree. People who live their entire lives being relentless bombarded by consumerist propaganda and pro-capitalist disinformation are not truly free to vote against it, nor were they given the chance. Al Gore cared more about the environment than Bush, but he was still a capitalist that supported car dependency and the military industrial complex.

        • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Which is why replacing First-past-the-post voting is so important. We need to have more then two options.

          Democrats believe in democracy right? What’s the hold up blue states?

        • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          So you’re absolving “Generation Me” of ever having to think for themselves? The same generation that could have educated themselves for less than the price of new car, and simply chose not to because a high school diploma was enough?

          Millennials were just as heavily, if not more propagandized, and yet, as a cohort, we have skewed far from Baby Boomers (ie Millenials are killing x), while retaining the ability to be critical of the systems we have inherited. We are also far more educated and far more in debt. All as a result of Boomers subsidizing their own welfare on the backs of their children and grandchildren.

          Baby Boomers collectively failed upward, soaked up benefit after benefit while telling themselves that they deserved their station in life, and then pulled up every ladder behind them.

          So, hard disagree.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      You might as well just take the long nap.

      No ones gonna do anything.

      We’re gonna keep wringing our hands about it, desperately shout time is running out…and watch time run out, then shrug our shoulders and go “Welp, nothing we can do about it now”

  • Lun0tic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Tires also used to last longer. They are designed to wear out faster now.

    • icedterminal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 minutes ago

      This is so far from the truth.

      The real reason is cars are heavier. The more weight, the more wear on the tires. You can only make a tire compound so hard before they become uncomfortable rolling chunks.

      In the 70s when the fuel crisis hit, cars were very inefficient. Heavy steel and heavy engines that guzzled field. As the technology has progressed we use composite materials to make them lighter where we can. Some of these materials are more expensive than others, so you won’t find them on all models. Magnesium and Carbon fiber for example. We started to make cars lighter.

      Then there’s features, creature comforts, etc. We started adding more and more fancy features over time. These all add up. Heavy sound deadening pads are placed all over the bare chassis. Rip up your car’s carpet, underneath you’ll find them. They’re in the door and behind the dashboard. There’s even foam in the A, B and C pillars. We figured out that we can make cars quieter. Now that we can make them quieter, let’s add a lot of creature comforts. Power, heated seats and mirrors. Power windows, powered lift gates, and anything else that’s powered. These require electric motors. Not sure if you’ve ever seen these electric motors, but these are actually quite heavy little things. A few speakers is now almost a dozen in many models. Lots of trim pieces that make the car more aesthetically pleasing add weight.

      Safety is a huge factor as well. One or two airbags has turned into about a dozen. Extra beams that are used to dissipate energy around you in a crash. My car has 8 alone for just the front driver and passenger.

      Got a hybrid or an EV? These absolutely demolish tires because the additional components adds a lot of weight.

      Even though we got better at making composite materials and reducing weight where we could, our need for creature comforts and advancement in technology has caused the overall trend for a car’s weight to go up. This information is readily available if you’d like to search the Internet.

      A set of tires wear endurance has only gone up over time. But because of a car’s weight, it reduces its ability. Your driving habits also greatly impact how long your tires will last. Do you have a Rivian or Tesla? Go easy on the acceleration and showing off with the spirited driving. You can make your tires last less than 10,000 mi. Do you add additional weight? How long is that additional weight being hauled around? In other words, if your trunk is full of stuff, clean it out. You’re increasing fuel consumption and increasing tire wear.

    • AngryMob@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      47 minutes ago

      What? Maybe if you compare an old hard tire with no grip to a modern soft tire with tons of grip. But a modern hard tire lasts as long or longer and has more grip in all conditions.

  • maniii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    52
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Vulcanized RUBBER tyres shed PLASTIC microparticles … hmmmm something sounds very rubbery and not at all plasticky… i truly wonder what it could be …hmmmm…

    Edit: “Is rubber considered a plastic? Although materials such as rubber, textiles, adhesives, and paint may in some cases meet this definition, they are not considered plastics.”

    Here is a Scientific study MIS-CONSTRUING Rubber as a Plastic AND MAKING ASSUMPTIONS WITHOUT PROPER EXPLANATIONS !!!

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5664766/

    This is the problem with Scientific studies, Media, Reporting and bunch of people running with studies that make a lot of FALSE ASSUMPTIONS WITHOUT TELLING YOU THE FULL FUCKING STORY.

    • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Daddy I’m so sorry microplastics in your bloodstream are causing your untimely demise…

      mic

      miiii

      Yes Daddy?

      they’re MICRO rubbers you ignorant IDIOT

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      This is the problem with Scientific studies, Media, Reporting and bunch of people running with studies that make a lot of FALSE ASSUMPTIONS WITHOUT TELLING YOU THE FULL FUCKING STORY.

      ah, but randos online know the real story. The Caplocks only adds to your authenticity. Look, you’re trying to ague about semantics to discredit concerns about microplastics getting in people’s blood streams. Within the context of micro particials, there’s really not much difference between “rubber” and “plastic” as what makes them unique to each other is their properties when bonded in large forms. Maybe it’s harmless or maybe it’s this generation’s lead poisons, toxoplasmosis, or aspectos. Aspectos, which by the way, is perfectly natural, but still dangerous to humans. Something I have to remind people when they talk about corn oil based plastics. The half life on PLA may be shorter, but research is still being done on how quickly harm happens and what levels harm can occur.

    • Affidavit@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      hi HOW ARE you TODAY?

      i’m pretty GOOD MYSELF!!111!!!

      I TOO like to RANDOMLY SWITCH TO upper case.

      I HOPE YOU RECOVER SOON!

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Thanks for the link that argues against your rant. I guess you could salvage it some by comparing the numbers and claiming the plastic component is lower than the main article’s numbers in contribution. It would be awkward though if you find out they already separated those number in their math. It also doesn’t change the point that a huge amount of pollution in the form of tire wear occurs constantly and isn’t going away anytime soon.

    • Suzune@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The study linked in the article also says that microplastic and rubber are different. As far as I understood it, they also quoted it wrong.

      • maniii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Exactly. We need more and better peer-reviewed and vetted studies. Is rubber pollution exactly same as micro-plastics? Or is it 80% the same effects? Is it the same effects due to the same chemicals? Is it similar due to the same processes and not necessarily the end-product material ? Many many questions that people don’t seem to understand and just blindly trust whatever some “latest study shows …” bullshit that has been going on for a very long time.

    • ReanuKeeves@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Microrubbers sounds like condoms for guys with unfortunate situations in their pants though

      • maniii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Maybe we need a new study of “Forever chemicals” and “Short-term chemicals” and “Long-lived chemicals” redefined and not use confusing terms like “microplastics” for anything polymerised. DNA is a polymer but we dont call people microplastics.

        • maniii@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Sure we might have microplastics and microrubbers inside our brains and balls.

    • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Imagine things being made of multiple components and not one pure component. /s

      • maniii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Imagine confusing Tigers and Lions and claiming BIG CAT micro-pussies are causing problems all over the world!!!

        Tigers are different and Lions are different. They are big cats but different species have different habitats and habits.

        So dont mix Plastics and Rubbers when they are chemically different and may have different manufacturing processes.

        Was that really hard to understand ?

        • BakerBagel
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I worked at a tire factory. Half the rubber used in tires is synthetic rubber, which is made from plastic. Your car tires are not made from 100% natural rubber from a tree.

          • maniii@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Synthetic rubber is not plastic. It is from petrochemicals but not the same chemical substance.

            • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              A plastic is just a material made from polymers, you are the one adding artificial limitations on what polymers can be used. The belts in tires use both nylon and polyester which are both plastics by anyone’s definition. So even by your strict definition, tires are made up, at least in part, by plastic.

        • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Was that really hard to understand ?

          … umm, yes. I have literally no idea what you’re talking about.