• King@lemmy.worldBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      2 years ago

      Other browsers already do, firefox users just cant stop licking mozillas balls

        • King@lemmy.worldBanned
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          2 years ago

          The point is they already do unlike what the article claims

          • qfjp@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 years ago

            It’s desktop extensions. Most mobile browsers only support a subset of all available extensions (including Firefox!). Now, Firefox will support its whole library of extensions.

            • King@lemmy.worldBanned
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 years ago

              They only mention “open extension ecosystem” idk if that means everything and also I haven’t found an extension not working on mine yet I have even installed a flash player extension for flash games on my browser so no opinion on those statements

              • qfjp@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                They only mention “open extension ecosystem”

                • The title: “Prepare your Firefox desktop extension for the upcoming Android release”
                • End of the first paragraph: “Here’s everything developers need to know to get their Firefox desktop extensions ready for Android usage and discoverability on AMO…”
                • End of the second paragraph: “so why not start optimizing your desktop extension for mobile-use right away?”

                also I haven’t found an extension not working on mine yet I have even installed a flash player extension for flash games on my browser so no opinion on those statements

                And those were installed from the mozilla addon library? With full support for a mobile interface? And you tried every extension available?

                I have even installed a flash player extension for flash games

                Flash used to be a mobile extension…

                • King@lemmy.worldBanned
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  What u highlight desktop for, the article is about android and the 10 extensions it has so far, your own highlight says “about upcoming android release” desktop is only mentioned for devs to optimize their shit for mobile use.

                  And no my extensions were not from mozilla thats my whole point I can get extensions elsewhere this whole time, which is why I mock mobile mozilla users in the comments thinking mozilla did something revolutionary.

            • King@lemmy.worldBanned
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 years ago

              I think youre the one confused other mobile browsers already support extensions, too bad 100 people downvoting lack the skill to google

      • randint@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Firefox has always had been the most attractive to many people.

  • mrvictory1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Mobile FF is already awesome with UBlock Origin and YT background playback extensions. I wish to install an auto redirect extension. (Twitter to Nitter) I know it is doable on beta w/ extensions etc. but I want to see them on normal Firefox.

  • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    That’s nice, maybe they can finally re-enable about:config in the damn thing too. They removed it from mobile Firefox years ago and the lack of it aggravates the hell out of me.

    • viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Fennec still supports it, just as it supports add-ons from the official Mozilla store. Don’t see any reason why I should go back to the official app.

      • kubj31196@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Is there an easy way to migrate from the official app to Fennec? Keeping accounts, extensions and settings?

        • viking@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          If you have enabled the sync feature in Firefox, it seamlessly works with Fennec; as does the integration between Fennec and Firefox Desktop. Simply log on with your Firefox account in Fennec, and you won’t even feel the difference.

      • kenbw2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        How do I make use of this? I can’t see a way to install them on my Fennec from F Droid

        • viking@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yup. Unless they break anything, which I can’t really imagine at this point.

  • Mininux@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Doesn’t it already support them ?

    edit: yes it already supports them, but it seems that now there will be more focus on mobile

    edit2: also they forgot about kiwi, but then it’s not a major browser (and is it still maintained ?). still would’ve been cool if they corrected this

    • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      On android I find its also a good idea to have a system wide ad blocker solution because android and all their apps are so inundated by ads, so I recommend dns66 (which can be found on fdroid) which has multiple blocklists you can subscribe to. This will cover some ads thats are built directly into apps and almost all ads that would appear in websites on a browser. This helps a lot since some apps will open a browser window for -reasons- and they sometimes have their own internal browser or they will just use chrome by default, not respecting your default browser choice, and in those cases you cant have ublock installed to protect you and those pages are so ad-overloaded that finding what you are looking for is next to impossible.

      • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah I wish I could edit my hosts file for example so it blocks all advertisement websites.

      • time_fo_that@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’ve got a Pihole set up running on my NAS but unfortunately it’s really difficult to find ad tracking lists that both 1) block ads effectively and 2) don’t break a large portion of webpages

    • gun@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Whoa 🤯. Never realized this somehow. That’s awesome. No ads on mobile.

  • cpressland@celeb.pizza
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I would kill for this on iOS. Don’t get me wrong, I’m pretty happy with my Safari Extensions, but I’d rather have uBlock Origin, Stylish etc.

  • vinyl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Been using Iceraven, although it only supports a handful of extensions such as dark reader and uBlock

  • popemichael@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’ve been using the nightly build, using the desktop extensions for a while now. It’s SO worth it. In particular, the YouTube “SponsorBlock” is super convenient.

      • popemichael@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I have other tweaks and scripts that I have written for personal usage. Using nightly Firefox makes it so I can use those tweaks universally on desktop and phone.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      While I get it, sponsors are what enable the content you watch to even exist. It’s one thing if it’s youtube ads, but those sponsors are directly partnered with and paying content creators. On the other hand, Patreon is really the best way to go for content you truly care about.

      • Obi@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Do they actually lose anything from these sponsorships if you just skip that part? Because that’s basically what the addon does. I’m not sure these sponsorships go as far as looking at minutes watched or whatever, I assumed it’s a pre-agreed amount.

        • beanz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          must be, because half of them have the sponsor segment as its own chapter in the video, making it super easy to skip. I don’t imagine they would make it as easy if they really wanted you to watch it.

      • JTskulk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m sure parent is totally fine being subsidized by all the people not running it.

      • MrNobody@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I find this take amusing. Blocking the ads means the content creator doesn’t get paid for those ads since they won’t get seen by those end users, but sponsor’s have already paid the creator for that part. Whether you watch it or not the money has already changed hands, all it does is automate you skipping those segments.

        • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          While I agree in the short term, video analytics still come into play for future sponsorships and payouts. Do you think a sponsor will be willing to continue paying a creator if their sponsor segments receive no watch time?

      • popemichael@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m 100% not going to buy anything from those sponsored segments.

        Also, there is a white list option for your favorite creators

  • Siliconic@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    About time. I’m tempted to switch back to Mull from Bromite, but I’m worried about the security of Firefox compared to Chromium (that’s why I switched in the first place), I’ve heard that particularly Mobile Firefox has awful sandboxing and bad security, I’m pretty sure it was the GrapheneOS team saying this? I’m no security expert though…

    • randint@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Yes it was the GrapheneOS team who said that. See the paragraph just above Camera. I literally just skimmed their guides and saw this yesterday while considering getting a Pixel.

      • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I use Mull and Vanadium on Graphene OS, and the experience on Vanadium is just okay by comparison. It is true that not having extensions does decrease the attack surface, and Vanadium does have a built in ad blocker, but it simply isn’t as all encompassing as ublock’s list.

        I use Mull mainly but don’t log into anything with it, and have noscript extension on by default.

        I also turn off JS by default in Vanadium. Both browsers have ways of making exceptions for certain sites in this case, but NoScript has more granular control.

        I remember reading on reddit a convo that basically the GrapheneOS team was much more concerned with security than privacy. This isn’t to say they don’t care about privacy at all, just that they will always prioritize security first.

        This makes sense considering their decision to only officially support the Pixel line of devices. You still are supporting Google by giving them your money (and a bit of your data in the process of purchase). Additionally, the decision to default to using the Google Play Store and sandbox the apps, rather than use the Aurora Store, also points to these underlying values.

        • randint@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yeah, I can tell this just from skimming their FAQ and Usage Guides. When they talk about the applications they offer, they always sell it as the most secure thing ever. I still personally care more about privacy than security though.

        • JuvenoiaAgent@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Posted this above, but it might interest you as an alternative to Vanadium:

          Bromite hasn’t been updated in a while, so you should at least switch to Cromite if you’re not switching to Mull. It’s a fork by a previous Bromite contributor and includes some improvements, like a bottom toolbar and adblock plus (so normal block lists, not Bromite’s less customizable ad blocker.

          • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Is Vanadium just Bromite under the hood? I thought they were separate projects…

            • JuvenoiaAgent@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              They’re different, but according to its readme, Cromite includes “security enhancement patches from GrapheneOS project”, so I assume it contains Vanadium’s changes as well as other improvements.

    • JuvenoiaAgent@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Bromite hasn’t been updated in a while, so you should at least switch to Cromite if you’re not switching to Mull. It’s a fork by a previous Bromite contributor and includes some improvements, like a bottom toolbar and adblock plus (so normal block lists, not Bromite’s less customizable ad blocker.

    • MapTheft@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m trying to make the switch over to FF, but Vivaldi just has so many features I find useful.

        • MapTheft@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          The web panel is the feature I’m missing the most currently. I’ve tried, without success, to replicate the tab bar to the bottom of the window too.