• King@lemmy.worldBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      2 years ago

      Other browsers already do, firefox users just cant stop licking mozillas balls

        • King@lemmy.worldBanned
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          2 years ago

          The point is they already do unlike what the article claims

          • qfjp@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 years ago

            It’s desktop extensions. Most mobile browsers only support a subset of all available extensions (including Firefox!). Now, Firefox will support its whole library of extensions.

            • King@lemmy.worldBanned
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 years ago

              They only mention “open extension ecosystem” idk if that means everything and also I haven’t found an extension not working on mine yet I have even installed a flash player extension for flash games on my browser so no opinion on those statements

              • qfjp@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 years ago

                They only mention “open extension ecosystem”

                • The title: “Prepare your Firefox desktop extension for the upcoming Android release”
                • End of the first paragraph: “Here’s everything developers need to know to get their Firefox desktop extensions ready for Android usage and discoverability on AMO…”
                • End of the second paragraph: “so why not start optimizing your desktop extension for mobile-use right away?”

                also I haven’t found an extension not working on mine yet I have even installed a flash player extension for flash games on my browser so no opinion on those statements

                And those were installed from the mozilla addon library? With full support for a mobile interface? And you tried every extension available?

                I have even installed a flash player extension for flash games

                Flash used to be a mobile extension…

                • King@lemmy.worldBanned
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  What u highlight desktop for, the article is about android and the 10 extensions it has so far, your own highlight says “about upcoming android release” desktop is only mentioned for devs to optimize their shit for mobile use.

                  And no my extensions were not from mozilla thats my whole point I can get extensions elsewhere this whole time, which is why I mock mobile mozilla users in the comments thinking mozilla did something revolutionary.

            • King@lemmy.worldBanned
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 years ago

              I think youre the one confused other mobile browsers already support extensions, too bad 100 people downvoting lack the skill to google

  • mrvictory1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    Mobile FF is already awesome with UBlock Origin and YT background playback extensions. I wish to install an auto redirect extension. (Twitter to Nitter) I know it is doable on beta w/ extensions etc. but I want to see them on normal Firefox.

  • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    That’s nice, maybe they can finally re-enable about:config in the damn thing too. They removed it from mobile Firefox years ago and the lack of it aggravates the hell out of me.

    • viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Fennec still supports it, just as it supports add-ons from the official Mozilla store. Don’t see any reason why I should go back to the official app.

      • kenbw2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        How do I make use of this? I can’t see a way to install them on my Fennec from F Droid

      • kubj31196@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Is there an easy way to migrate from the official app to Fennec? Keeping accounts, extensions and settings?

        • viking@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          If you have enabled the sync feature in Firefox, it seamlessly works with Fennec; as does the integration between Fennec and Firefox Desktop. Simply log on with your Firefox account in Fennec, and you won’t even feel the difference.

        • viking@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yup. Unless they break anything, which I can’t really imagine at this point.

  • Mininux@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Doesn’t it already support them ?

    edit: yes it already supports them, but it seems that now there will be more focus on mobile

    edit2: also they forgot about kiwi, but then it’s not a major browser (and is it still maintained ?). still would’ve been cool if they corrected this

  • cpressland@celeb.pizza
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I would kill for this on iOS. Don’t get me wrong, I’m pretty happy with my Safari Extensions, but I’d rather have uBlock Origin, Stylish etc.

    • gun@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Whoa 🤯. Never realized this somehow. That’s awesome. No ads on mobile.

    • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      On android I find its also a good idea to have a system wide ad blocker solution because android and all their apps are so inundated by ads, so I recommend dns66 (which can be found on fdroid) which has multiple blocklists you can subscribe to. This will cover some ads thats are built directly into apps and almost all ads that would appear in websites on a browser. This helps a lot since some apps will open a browser window for -reasons- and they sometimes have their own internal browser or they will just use chrome by default, not respecting your default browser choice, and in those cases you cant have ublock installed to protect you and those pages are so ad-overloaded that finding what you are looking for is next to impossible.

      • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah I wish I could edit my hosts file for example so it blocks all advertisement websites.

      • time_fo_that@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’ve got a Pihole set up running on my NAS but unfortunately it’s really difficult to find ad tracking lists that both 1) block ads effectively and 2) don’t break a large portion of webpages

  • vinyl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Been using Iceraven, although it only supports a handful of extensions such as dark reader and uBlock

  • popemichael@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’ve been using the nightly build, using the desktop extensions for a while now. It’s SO worth it. In particular, the YouTube “SponsorBlock” is super convenient.

      • popemichael@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I have other tweaks and scripts that I have written for personal usage. Using nightly Firefox makes it so I can use those tweaks universally on desktop and phone.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      While I get it, sponsors are what enable the content you watch to even exist. It’s one thing if it’s youtube ads, but those sponsors are directly partnered with and paying content creators. On the other hand, Patreon is really the best way to go for content you truly care about.

      • JTskulk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m sure parent is totally fine being subsidized by all the people not running it.

      • popemichael@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m 100% not going to buy anything from those sponsored segments.

        Also, there is a white list option for your favorite creators

      • MrNobody@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I find this take amusing. Blocking the ads means the content creator doesn’t get paid for those ads since they won’t get seen by those end users, but sponsor’s have already paid the creator for that part. Whether you watch it or not the money has already changed hands, all it does is automate you skipping those segments.

        • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          While I agree in the short term, video analytics still come into play for future sponsorships and payouts. Do you think a sponsor will be willing to continue paying a creator if their sponsor segments receive no watch time?

      • Obi@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Do they actually lose anything from these sponsorships if you just skip that part? Because that’s basically what the addon does. I’m not sure these sponsorships go as far as looking at minutes watched or whatever, I assumed it’s a pre-agreed amount.

        • beanz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          must be, because half of them have the sponsor segment as its own chapter in the video, making it super easy to skip. I don’t imagine they would make it as easy if they really wanted you to watch it.

    • sebi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Unfortunatly, this will not be the case on iOS as Apple doesn’t allow third-party browser engines and stores

      • theangryseal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Bummer.

        I might get me a damn android.

        I’m just buried in their ecosystem. Gah. I’ve been using apple computers and phones since I was a kid. I started on the Quadra 650.

        My last mac (which I still use for music recording) was a 2012 Mac Pro. I’ve pretty much gone all in on the phones these days with a Steam Deck as my primary computer but definitely my secondary device.

        I have photos on iCloud going back to about 2014 when I stopped jailbreaking my phones. Moving all of that would be no fun at all. Getting used to a new OS wouldn’t be any fun either. I hate doing anything on my uncle’s Samsung.

        I really wish there was a third alternative. A good Linux distro centered around phones or something.

        • sebi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          I also used iPhones for a long time until I had to switch to a temporary phone due to age-related hardware malfunction. Out of curiosity, I tried /e/ OS and was very pleasantly surprised.

          The temporary phone is now in use for at least a year and I also get to enjoy other extraordinary features like USB-C and a headphone-jack. In the future, I may also give LineageOS a try.

        • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          I’m an iPhone man, but if weren’t I would be using Google Pixels.

          It’s the most polished Android experience I’ve seen so far, and you can do literally whatever you want with them as they have unlockable boot loaders.

      • Powerpoint@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        The EU is working on opening that up at least so there is a light at the end of the tunnel for those users

  • noodle@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s long overdue. I’ve been running Nightly to get around the shockingly limited number of addons available on Firefox for Android. Hopefully Mozzila don’t fumble the bag with this as its a great opportunity to steal users from Chrome.

    • raptir@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I do find it funny when people talk about how few extensions are supported, when it has the best extension support of any mobile browser.

      Like I get it, but still.

      • noodle@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Relative to desktop, it is comparatively few.

        Best on mobile, yes. The few they allow in FFfA stable is a tiny amount considering how many actually can work, but Mozilla arbitrarily decided they won’t allow.

      • NickNak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        It used to be able to support all desktop addons but they for some reason took that away a while back

          • NickNak@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            I didn’t know it was a mass rewrite, I just assumed they ruined the UI and features to “keep” up with mobile chrome, as most of these big tech companies do

    • sab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I don’t see how they would, since ios Firefox doesn’t use the same rendering engine it uses on other platforms, Gecko. Instead it has to use Safari, just like any other browser on there.

      Duplicating support for all existing extensions would be pretty much impossible if you don’t control the rendering engine.

        • mishimaenjoyer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          this. they simply have to port the version they’re developing for android now and we’re golden. i guess it might find it’s way on non-eu-devices by community builds and testflight.

          • lustyargonian@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Yeah it’ll be a big task nonetheless. Firefox for Android needed gecko components to be ready to make use of gecko view, their rendering “engine”. iOS may be need its own version of gecko view, at least the bindings for it, as well as a new set of components for all the UI elements a full fledged browser may need.

        • sab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          I heard about allowing alternative app stores, but I’m not sure if that also removes the browser engine restrictions. (would make sense though, from an anti-monopoly pov)

          • lustyargonian@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            The restriction is from App Store, and bypassing it removes that hurdle. Microsoft faced the same issue when they were trying to launch their cloud streaming service within their app, not because they technically couldn’t, but because Apple wouldn’t let them to.

    • aquarisces@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      This is the only reason why I keep using Safari on iOS. If Firefox can get extensions working for iOS I’ll switch over the day it’s available.

      • mishimaenjoyer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        i miss(ed) exactly two things on iOS: a proper imageboard reader (fixed, there are now chance and janchan) and stand alone firefox, wich is now just a matter of time.