Summary

Leading scientists, including Nobel laureates, are urging a halt to research on creating “mirror life” microbes, citing “unprecedented risks” to life on Earth.

Mirror microbes, built from reversed molecular structures, could evade natural immune systems, leading to uncontrollable lethal infections.

While mirror molecules hold potential for medical and industrial uses, researchers warn that mirror organisms could escape containment and resist antibiotics.

A 299-page report in Science advocates banning such research until safety can be ensured and calls for global debate on its ethical and ecological implications.

  • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    36 minutes ago

    A 299-page report in Science advocates banning such research until safety can be ensured and calls for global debate on its ethical and ecological implications

    Which will not be read or followed!

    Weeeeee! Maybe i die of superflu instead of hunger or jackboot

  • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    136
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Hey babe, wake up. A new human-created, extinction-level event just dropped.

      • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Yeah, we need more conflict. We’ll create the ultimate “them” for us to “us” against. Contact with them is literally lethal! Can’t get more conflict than that… yet.

    • Ragdoll X@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Meh, we get a new one of those every year now. They’ll have to try harder to impress me.

  • frezik
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Why we need a moon base with an unconnected section where everything is done by robots

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yea, I’d definitely trust us with that… we could probably get one of our highly trust worthy billionaires to run it.

      Maybe we could equip this moon base equipped with civilization ending microbes with a giant laser just in case sending the bio weapon back to earth seems too expensive to the board members?

    • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I know I just responded, but I read the article, and the drug page, and discovered the thing we’re talking about. Racemic organic molecules are not the same thing here.

      These are specifically proteins used for cellular life. These are significantly more complex, as there are no natural bindings between the two. To note this from Wikipedia:

      Examples include thalidomide, ibuprofen, cetirizine and salbutamol. A well known drug that has different effects depending on its ratio of enantiomers is amphetamine. Adderall is an unequal mixture of both amphetamine enantiomers. A single Adderall dose combines the neutral sulfate salts of dextroamphetamine and amphetamine, with the dextro isomer of amphetamine saccharate and D/L-amphetamine aspartate monohydrate. The original Benzedrine was a racemic mixture, and isolated dextroamphetamine was later introduced to the market as Dexedrine. The prescription analgesic tramadol is also a racemate.

      We know that those drugs aren’t great in pregnancy, but Adderall specifically does not cause birth defects. Again, these molecules are significantly less complex than any protein they would talk about here.

      • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I know they’re not directly related, but my point, as I said to @skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de, is that we already know even simple mirroring molecules can do to living things, nevermind complex proteins and entire organisms.

        lf there’s no proper safeguards, it could do unimaginable damage (which is also why I used Thalidomide as an example, as it inspired literally tonnes of safeguards post-scandel).

        Like GMOs can be dangerous as is, but at least in most instances it’s only the living organism itself that’s dangerous. With mirroring, any part of that organism could be dangerous to normal lifeforms, so even sterilised mirror waste could be dangerous

        • AmidFuror@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Some mirrored compounds are dangerous by coincidence. It’s not that mirrored compounds are inherently dangerous.

          Non-mirrored compounds can be incredibly dangerous, often because the organisms that produce them evolved to be dangerous. Take botulinum toxin, for example.

          What would make mirrored life dangerous would be if it could escape to the wild and increase its biomass there. Non-living toxins can be deadly, but at least they don’t self-perpetuate. Even prions are limited in how they “reproduce.” They are nothing like the threat of viruses.

    • orclev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I don’t see any mention in there of Thalidomide being a mirror molecule, do you have a source for that?

      • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Fair. I had thought that article with the scandel would mention it, but apparently doesn’t. Only the main article does.

        It has two possible configurations:

        • The Right handed configuration had the desired effects and isn’t harmful.

        • The Left handed mirror caused birth defects.

        Oh and the best part is, if you try to make a pure mixture of the right handed version, it can convert to the left handed one in the body!

        • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 hours ago

          why the fuck would it be mentioned. thalidomide is synthetic, article is about wrong enantiomer of natural compounds working in a living organism that has unnatural chirality. that teratogenic effect of thalidomide was figured out and is now used in anticancer treatments. it’s a tool, and if you use it right it can be useful. that thing in article is highly speculative as of now and making any component would be hideously expensive anyway

          • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Correct. It’s also a much simpler organic molecule than any of the proteins they are talking about creating.

          • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Man, you ain’t gotta be rude.

            I meant the article I linked to the Thalidomide scandal. I was surprised that chirality wasn’t mentioned even once in the wiki article about it causing birth defects, considering it’s chirality was a key factor in that scandal.

            I know it wouldn’t be in the OP article because they’re only minorly related instances, but my point was tjat we already know what mirroring even a simple compound can do to living things, nevermind complex proteins and entire organisms.

            And IMO, using arguably the single most widely known instance of mirror chemicals gone wrong to make that point is perfectly valid.

            Yes, but like any tool, if there’s no safeguards, it will could do unimaginable damage (which is also why I used Thalidomide as an example, as it inspired literally tonnes of safeguards post-scandel). Like GMOs can be dangerous as is, but at least in most instances it’s only the living organism itself that’s dangerous. With mirroring, any part of that organism could be dangerous to normal lifeforms, so even sterilised mirror waste could be dangerous

    • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Well that answers my question if mirror cells need mirror molecules.

      They just die and break apart turning into mirror molecules. Oh well.

      • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Mirror molecules that by themselves could easily pose a risk to anyone exposed by them.

        My point in even mentioning Thalidomide was that we already know what mirroring even a simple compound can do to living things, nevermind complex proteins and entire organisms.

        GMOs can be dangerous as is without proper safeguards, but at least in most instances it’s only the living organism itself that’s dangerous. With mirroring, any part of that organism could be dangerous to normal lifeforms, so even sterilised mirror waste could be dangerous

          • batmaniam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            ooooh this is it! If you wanted to optimize evil add photosynthesis and nitrogen fixing and you’ve got it.

            Hell, I’d bet you could work on the chloroplasts in isolation of the rest of the organism to parallel path the research and optimize.

        • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Yes, it cannot be created naturally.

          The concern is that if one of the mirror proteins is able to be cloned naturally, then we would have a problem on our hands.

          However, those mirror cells would need a supply of “mirror food” such as “mirror sugar” in order to survive their natural lifespan. And then they would need to break apart into the mirror proteins that can be cloned. Racemic drugs like Thalidomide do not behave the way they are talking about in the article.

          I have my doubts that this is an actual concern. It’s not even similar to prions - prions are misfolded proteins that have the same chemical make up, but the natural enzymes end up cloning those over the natural ones because they are easier to make.

          • batmaniam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            “mirror sugar”. Just dropping some trivia. The first “no calorie” sweetners were actually mirror sugar. They’d activate tastebuds but couldn’t be adsorbed in the gut. Only problem was people crapped their brains out because the osmotic balance went to hell.

            edit: I think technically the first zero calorie sugar would have been literal lead (as in Pb) back in the ancient roman days, but I’m not really counting that.

              • batmaniam@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                2 hours ago

                you bet! I just remember that because we were learning about glucose is taken up (it’s an active process swapping sodium and potassium). Another fun bonus for you: thats what they figured out at university of florida (or at least implemented). Someone had the bright idea that if you gave athletes a beverage with not only glucose but the specific K+/Na+ they needed to run the enzymes that took up the glucose, they might perform better.

                So the football team, the Gators, got a special concoction of “Gator-aide” at their games. It smelled kinda like sweat, wasn’t sweet (glucose isn’t actually that sweet), so the formula was eventually tweaked, the branding changed to “gatorade”, but the university still RAKES in the money for that license.

                edit: Just to add another cool layer. The money to date has nothing to do with the innovation, that patent would have expired (which is fantastic because that concoction is basically how you treat all sorts of things like cholera where the body dies of dehydration despite having clean water, the UN, FEMA, etc basically hands out off-brand gatorade mix). The reason U of florida still gets the money isn’t formula, it’s the brand. Pepsi pays them for that “gator-aide” name. It’s rare IP perfect win; hydration mix for all, and if you there’s a business to be made selling it under a specific name so be it, doesn’t matter much to the person whos life is saved because of “generic hydration mix”.

          • batmaniam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Jumping in down here. I agree with you entirely that racemic mixes are a very different ball than mirror organisms; it’s been a known thing for a long time, and while I’m not positive, I’d be very surprised if FDA testing didn’t include different chiralities of both the original compound and metabolite.

            That being said, there’s nothing to say one version of a chiral protein can’t behave like a prion. I don’t know of any evidence where we’ve seen it happen either, though. There’s also potentially the issue of partial bonding. Not every domain on every protein is chiral. If a mirror protein has some domains that bind but other functional domains that are incompatible, you could see it incorporated into complex that either 1) are now non-functional or 2) have alternate folding that behaves similar to prions.

            Again though, I can’t point to any evidence of that. You can do the arrow pushing that shows how you get tetrodoxin from the stuff in your tea or coffee, it doesn’t mean it’s actually going to happen beyond the statistical realm interesting only to quantum physicists.

            Just chiming in because your comments are level headed and you’ve clearly got some knowledge in the area and appreciate the discussion. Looking forward to digging into the report this weekend, I had no idea this was even something are even attempting!

          • AmidFuror@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Agreed. And while deadly, prions don’t spread except through living organisms. It’s not like they’re converting all the proteins in the world without check.

    • netvor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      why on Earth would we make an entire mirror organism that’s has the potential to do the same but way, way worse

      it’s in the article: because of fAsCiNaTiOn!

  • Magister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    If the world wants it banned, you can be sure China and Russia are working on it in secret labs, maybe USA too anyway.

    • NeatoBuilds@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Like when the UN banned buying uranium from apartheid south Africa mines but everyone kept buying anyway

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Yeah, knowing how fucky simple protein molecules can get when you flip the chirality (prions, which are essentially the root cause of Alzheimer’s and CJD and a few other neurodegenerative conditions), making whole-ass microbes on that principle without understanding what that could even mean sounds like a WILDLY insane idea.

    • originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Not to nit but we absolutely do not know the root cause of Alzheimer’s disease. Not that prions are good or anything.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yeah, sorry, didn’t mean to imply that’s all that is going on with Alzheimer’s, but I was under the impression that prion formation/presence in neurological tissue was extremely highly correlated with the condition, though the precise mechanism of their effects aren’t yet well understood. Then again, I haven’t seriously looked into that stuff since my grandfather passed from it a while ago.

        • batmaniam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Sorry about your grandfather. There’s probably more than one mechanism for alzeimers (not an expert), but amaloyid plaque formation, which is definitely A way to develop alzheimer’s, is indeed a prion like event. I’m not sure if “prion” has some hyper-precise definition but the ideas similar: you get one amalyoid protein that misfolds, and acts as a nucleation site misfolding and agglomerating others.

    • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      As always, some people see Jurassic Park as inspiration and wonder why nobody gave Hammond a chance.

      The rest of us know that Dr. Malcolm was right from the start.

        • ramble81@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          6 hours ago

          That’s what you get when you treat your IT like crap and only hire one person.

          • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Newman didn’t built the park though. If you require power for the park to not fall apart immediately, you’ve already lost.

            Remember that whole movie happens in one night. T rexes breaking confinement the moment the fence isn’t electrified means some engineer fucked up big time.

        • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Yeah, people in real life won’t be morons, so that would never happen to us. I’m sure the company giving us the lowest bid has probably found some heretofore unknown innovation in efficiency. The end result will be just as good, but way cheaper…

        • batmaniam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Ok. THANK YOU. I also have to say my biggest issue with the newer one (I forget which) is when the parks going to hell, and the park director just decides to go off into the jungle. Like outside of just design of the park, there is NO way you don’t have rigid protocols in-place. Like you read about half the crap Disney does/can do at their parks… there’s no way the head of the park just goes “oh you guys got this, I’ll be back at some point, just do your best”.

          Like if ONLY for the reason it would be a known PR disaster for something that in universe already had PR disasters… that shit would have been drilled in since day -1000. It’s my biggest issue with the writing because it’s not even sci-fi.

          /end rant.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Jurassic Park at least makes sense because dinosaurs are cool.

        Opposite-chirality microbes, though? Nobody asked for that.

    • AmidFuror@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Prions are comprised of right-handed amino acids. I don’t think it’s the same thing to flip the chirality of a molecule as to flip the chirality of its subcomponents. DNA is usually right-handed, but there are left-handed forms created naturally. They don’t suddenly annihilate their counterparts in antimatter-like collisions.

      There are natural pharmaceuticals that consist of both chiralities, and obviously plenty of synthetic ones.

      It’s really not that simple. If we want to think about it longer, fine by me. But what is the real threat level?

      Edit: As others have pointed out, prions also aren’t an example of a different chirality of the native protein. The issue with prions is they can convert the native protein to their form, which “reproduces” themselves to make the disease progress. Mirrored organisms will propagate the chirality of their components, but their components don’t inherently convert their enantiomers once that organism is dead.

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Because when you discover something exceptionally dangerous the best approach is to halt research? To purposefully deprive yourself of understanding what it is and how it works and effects and interactions? Wouldn’t you want more research, just under more strict protocols?

    • StopTouchingYourPhone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Do you assume these scientists are fearful anti-intellectuals, like a gaggle of Covidiots or something? If you read the article, you’ll find that

      The expert group includes Dr Craig Venter, the US scientist who led the private effort to sequence the human genome in the 1990s, and the Nobel laureates Prof Greg Winter at the University of Cambridge and Prof Jack Szostak at the University of Chicago.

      These aren’t idiots, and their call came from a risk assessment performed by experts in their fields.

      While enthusiastic about research on mirror molecules, the report sees substantial risks in mirror microbes and calls for a global debate on the work. link to the 299-page report

      Beyond causing lethal infections, the researchers doubt the microbes could be safely contained or kept in check by natural competitors and predators.

      Dr Kate Adamala, a synthetic biologist at the University of Minnesota and co-author on the report, was working towards a mirror cell but changed tack last year after studying the risks in detail.

      “We should not be making mirror life,” she said. “We have time for the conversation. And that’s what we were trying to do with this paper, to start a global conversation.”

      • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        35 minutes ago

        “Unless compelling evidence emerges that mirror life would not pose extraordinary dangers, we believe that mirror bacteria and other mirror organisms, even those with engineered biocontainment measures, should not be created,” the authors write in Science.

        “We therefore recommend that research with the goal of creating mirror bacteria not be permitted, and that funders make clear that they will not support such work.”

        World-leading scientists have called for a halt on research to create “mirror life” microbes amid concerns that the synthetic organisms would present an “unprecedented risk” to life on Earth.

        I’m not saying the scientists involved are idiots, but the reporting on this seems to be ban now and ask questions later.

  • LostXOR@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Regardless of whether such an organism is a danger, there’s no way we can even come close to creating an entire organism with an opposite chirality in just a decade. That would require somehow synthesizing every chiral component of the organism (proteins, enzymes, DNA, etc) from scratch which is completely impossible with current or near future technology.

    • batmaniam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I’ve been out of synthetic bio for damn near two decades now, and an undergrad when was I even in it, but I’m not so sure. PCR didn’t come around until 85. I had professors that used to do every cycle manually. Human genome project wrapped in 03(?). You can order custom oligos for like $0.13USD a base pair mail order now. You type it in on a webform, a machine creates a custom molecule for you, and if you want to pay a little extra you can have it over-night. I suppose it depends what you call “near future”, and synthetic biology has always had moving goal posts when it came to “functional liposome” and “synthetic life”, but I don’t know… shit can move fast sometimes.

    • ShadowRam@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Because apparently the only way to get rid of it is extreme incineration.

      This isn’t viral or bacterial, where just a little bit of heat, UV or decay will kill it.

      When someone dies of prion disease, they need to incinerate everything. Clothes/Body/Beds, the whole thing.

      These are nightmare fuel.

      • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        UV or heat, or ethylene oxide and a number of other things still would kill wrong chirality bacteria, these are not prions, where are you people are getting this from

      • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Exactly this!

        For the most part Pathogens and even GMOs are only present an environmental threat in their living form, and once properly sterilised, can be disposed of safely.

        These mirror organisms would be dangerous in living and dead form, as they’d be chuck full of mirror proteins and biological molescules, any of which could trigger an environmental disaster if released by accident, so they’d have to be completely destroyed to be safe.

        Without proper regulations to ensure proper safeguards are in place, continued research into these organisms is plain dangerous

        • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          These mirror organisms would be dangerous in living and dead form, as they’d be chuck full of mirror proteins and biological molescules, any of which could trigger an environmental disaster if released by accident

          where are you getting this from? dead bacteria don’t come back to life

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I don’t know, seems like it could be merciful.

    Start back over again with the microbes and try to do a better job this time.

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    even the most impotent limp dicked authoritarian gets a raging boner over tech that will cause mass human death. the more apocalyptic, the better. as such, this might just be the only research that will be govt funded in the near future