President-elect Donald Trump on Friday confirmed that Republicans will work together to ditch Daylight Saving Time, the practice of changing the clocks by an hour twice a year.

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    41 minutes ago

    Some people want DST all year and others want Standard, because depending on where in the country you live–the latitude you are at, and whether you live at the east or west edge of your time zone makes a big difference in your experience of them.

    One solution is to adjust the time zone boundaries to make the timing work out better for different locations: making the lines a bit more diagonal will help, and/or add another zone so each zone is narrower and there’s not as much difference in sunrise/sunset times from one edge to the other.

    Another idea is, don’t choose between DST and Standard, choose halfway between them: at the next time change, change it by only 1/2 hour instead of a full hour, and leave it there. This may sound strange but there are other countries whose times are offset by 1/2 hour from the others, so it’s not that unusual. So you’re halfway between DST and Standard all year round, so it’s not a big difference and is a good compromise.

    Of course it’s always too dark in winter, but combine both of the above mitigations and you minimize any problems from leaving clocks the same all year, no matter what part of the country you live in.

  • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Fingers crossed that this gives us an extra hour of sunshine after work instead of before. It’s so depressing to leave the office at 4pm and it’s already dark out.

  • john89@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’m fine with that, but I think we should settle on Daylight Savings time. You know, when time is an hour ahead of what it is now.

  • Verat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I support standard time more, the 12 o clock at the center of the timezone should be noon, not having noon at 1PM, and day lengths are better on average without. DST makes it better, but only for sunset times, it makes the mornings drastically worse and I think employers and schools should just change their hours if they care so much about sunlight when they leave.

  • airportline@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    He’ll probably fuck it up by pushing for year-round DST (where the sun wouldn’t rise until after 8 AM in the winter).

  • Blaster M@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Instead of squawking over which to have, how about we all just uze Zulu time and eliminate the timezone confusion as well?

    • Llewellyn@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Then you will have different work hours everywhere. Chaos.
      Or you would need to force a lot of people to work at strange hours.

        • Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Sunrised in NY and CA at 7 am today in their respective time

          They are 3 hours apart in time zones.

          So if you wanted everyone to use same clock and for the sun to rise at 7am in NY. That would mean the sun would rise at 4am in CA.

          The sun would set at 1:30pm in CA

          Someone currently working a 9-5pm. It would become a 6-2pm job.

          How is that not going to cause chaos?

          • Pheonixdown@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Different employers in areas have their own arbitrary start/stop times already, time numbers are already an arbitrary concept, if someone in CA right now is working hours based on NY, when they work relative to the sun won’t change, just the numbers. The difference would be in people cold contacting others vs scheduled times. Right now if something is scheduled you have to convert it to your time, the formula for which will vary based on what time zone it is scheduled in. With this change, when reaching out to someone far away, you’d have to figure out if you’re contacting them at an appropriate time for their day/night, but that’s also inexact because people have different personal cycles anyway.

            Working hours being 9am-5pm vs 1900-0300 are just numbers.

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            Thats how many jobs already are. Jobs ending at 2pm in California because the majority of their market is already gone for the day. There is nothing chaotic about it at all. They are just numbers. We are open from 9-17. Hours posted, that’s when they are open. In New York when someone asks what time they are open the answer is 9-17, in Japan, it’s 9-17. No matter where you are in the world, look at your watch/clock/phone I should be able to say huh, it’s 11, they are open… I’ll give them a call. 0 chaos. No asking what time zone, no asking if it’s 11am or pm, just 9-17. Always the same for anyone who wants to do business with that business.

            Sidenote, think about how much cooler new years would be. Everyone on the planet moving to a new year at the same time. Not, well Terry is in Texas so it won’t be for another hour there.

            • Llewellyn@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              It’s not just numbers: there’s an even more significant factor: insolation. It would be much more uneven for different places and sunlight affects our psychic and physiology.

              • Pheonixdown@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                The amount of sun is not dictated by what time we arbitrarily call it. People’s scheduled times for work would vary based on location, so someone in CA who currently works 9-5 would would work like 17-3. Which would be the same as the sun coverage locally is concerned.

              • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                If companies actually are about such things then since the sun goes down at at 4:36 where I live, also the majority of people work inside. So a a healthier schedule would be getting off work at 12, and going to bed at 5:30pm (17:30).

                That extends the most amount of hours you spend awake and not sitting inside working, to daylight. So your workday should start around 3 it will be light outside when you take lunch at 7, and you get off at 12. So you have full access to the best psychic and physiology right? Sun sets at 4:30, and your in bed by 5:30.

                Somehow I don’t think that’s what people want though.

                I personally don’t care for it much, but I am usually more awake during the night anyways.

                My start times this week were; 6:30, 3:30, 6, 6, 5:30. Most would think that’s to early, especially when you have to drive 50 miles to work. So I leave at 2:30am on Tuesdays, lol.

                Every job is different

  • ohellidk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I’m for permanent daylight. Not a morning person so i hate the sun coming up so early. The mornings should be dark and gloomy (because I have to go to work, work sucks) plus the added benefit of actually having some light when you get off work. The sun going down right when I’m finally off is kind of insulting and depressing.

    Getting anyone to come to an agreement on this will be impossible since its based on preference.

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Aren’t they doing the opposite though, they are doing no light when you get off work?

      I’m definitely with you though, having it dark outside when I’m done work for the day sucks, even when working from home.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      That’s why you base it on science and will you look at that, regular time is better, who would have thought?

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Permanent Daylight would suuuuuck in the winter. You’d be at school or work for hours before you see the sun. I’d prefer to be on permanent standard time and just have the sun wake me up earlier in the summertime. I don’t need a 9 pm sunset.

  • shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I wonder how long until some special interest group like airlines come along and bribe him to change his mind, because it would be expensive for them to update their systems