*advancing her career

https://bsky.app/profile/aoc.bsky.social/post/3ldhxclo4wk2c

This is about AOC losing her bid for the Oversight committee to a geriatric Dem lifer. Sure she has systematically shredded any last bit of credibility with her triangulation, but hey, at least all the 5D polítical chess is paying off! She’s changing the system from the inside! It’s working this time!

Girl, you abandoned any pretense of doing working-class mass politics when you decided to do insider politics! Why are you tweeting like Bernie Sanders circa 2012? There’s no we! There’s no mass movement behind you! It’s just NYC DSA and some Warren libs (but I repeat myself)

  • Tomorrow_Farewell [any, they/them]@hexbear.netEnglish
    191·
    5 days ago

    She literally has zero pull in congress

    So, she’s not accomplishing anything is what you are saying now? Cool.
    I disagree, however. She has the same interests as your Bidens, your Trumps, your Sinemas, etc., and she acts on them, and not on the interests of the working class - in the US or elsewhere.

    Let me know when you do something actually effective

    Let me know when she does something actually effective for the working class. She couldn’t even keep Dementia Biden as the nominee so that he could disassemble your empire.

    last I checked you havent murdered any CEOs

    Neither has she. And she hasn’t acted against their interests as of yet in general.

    or won any political office

    Why is winning an office in a nazi government good?

    Of the two of you, AOC is far more effective at accomplishing her goals

    So would be people like Hitler, Washington, Leopold II. Do you want us to celebrate those genocidal slavers as well?

    • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      11·
      5 days ago

      I simply point you back to your lack of reading comprehension. ‘accomplishments’ does not mean you like what shes done. shes also never supported a genocide.

      So, she’s not accomplishing anything is what you are saying now? Cool.

      No, I said she has zero pull. that isnt the same thing as no accomplishments. thats an issue with the DNC not AOC. learn to properly direct ire.

      • Belly_Beanis [he/him]@hexbear.netEnglish
        24·
        5 days ago

        She literally voted to supply weapons to Isreal while condemning Hamas for fighting against a genocidal, settler, European colonial project. How is that not supporting a genocide?

      • Tomorrow_Farewell [any, they/them]@hexbear.netEnglish
        19·
        5 days ago

        I simply point you back to your lack of reading comprehension. ‘accomplishments’ does not mean you like what shes done

        So, her accomplishments are directly adversarial to our goals, is what you are saying. And you want us to both believe that she has no power in the government and that we should support her.
        Riiiiiight.

        shes also never supported a genocide

        I have already cited your ‘source’ as saying that she did act directly in support for a genocide. She has literally taken action to imprison and otherwise suppress anti-genocide protestors.

        No, I said she has zero pull

        If she has no power, then her ‘accomplishments’ are not actually hers.

        thats an issue with the DNC not AOC

        She’s on the side of the DNC.