• muelltonne@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    294
    ·
    5 days ago

    Never use a “for-profit adblocker”. Ublock Origin is free, open source and therefore won’t fuck you over. You can guess where this “profit” is coming from when you’re not paying for your “for-profit” adblocker

    • daddy32@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      95
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Never use a “for-profit adblocker”.

      Most prominently, this includes Adblock Plus, which functions as extortion-ware, extorting payments from ad-dealers to let their ads through.

    • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      We have a problem. People have learned that they shouldn’t use a free VPN. By that logic you shouldn’t use a free ad blocker either. People don’t understand the details enough so they operate on broad ideas.

      • GekkoState@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        4 days ago

        There is a difference between “free & open source” and “free because you don’t pay with money”.

        The first means it can be peer reviewed by anyone to make sure they aren’t doing anything shady.

        • lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          The issue is that the difference is clear to us, but not to everyone else. Even at the periphery of the tech world, I’ve met people generally aware what source code is, but not of the specific concept of “Open Source” and why it makes a difference. We should avoid falling into the bubble trap where we assume that what’s familiar to us is familiar to everyone else as well.

        • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yeah that’s right. Really, the difference is between free software and free services.

          Software can be free and open source and that can be a viable model, even a preferable model. Services can not be free without some party being exploited. In the best of cases this means services are provided by volunteers (and they are being exploited), but more commonly in business, it’s the users who are being exploited.

          But as a rule, you should be suspicious of free services.

      • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        I dunno if there’s just a lack of education around what open-source means or what. Like jeez, you can contribute to unlock origin. You can study it and see if there’s anything you disagree with. You can fork it and change it.

    • unalivejoy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 days ago

      For-profit ad blockers make their money from either ad injection or extorting ad companies to whitelist their ads. This is why the original adblock plus fell out of use.

    • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I agree, unless it’s straight up paid software which I usually don’t mind paying for if it’s good and I need it. Although arguably uBlock Origin is so close to perfection that I can’t imagine how a paid ad blocker would hold up.

      • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        What software have you paid for? Over here, proud owner of (off the top of my head) Keyboard Maestro, BetterTouchTool, Shottr, and superwhisper for Mac.

        Would be hard to live without these automation/macro, screenshot, and dictation tools!

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          Shottr is legit. It’s really amazing that there aren’t more decent screenshotting tools when they’re so incredibly useful. People would rather just take a picture of their screen and upload it that way :cringe:

          • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            Shottr was well worth their Black Friday price ($12?). But the free version is entirely sufficient and worked well for me for over a year.

            Snagit has 10 times as many features for several times the price, but somehow Shottr is like the most efficient app ever. So, so fast! But Snagit is more like Shottr plus a miniature Photoshop so can excuse some of that.


            Oh hey, forgot Snippety the text expander 🔥 even has an iOS keyboard.

            Great dev too, super responsive solo dude.

            • Ulrich@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 days ago

              It’s not just a higher price, it’s an ongoing subscription. That’s not something I would ever agree to. It makes zero sense. It’s just greedy bullshit, in my opinion. Give me a flat fee and if it breaks or you add new features, I will decide if I want to pay again for an upgrade.

        • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Shout-out to Beyond Compare! It makes my life as a many-hatted systems librarian much easier.