• shneancy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    both fuel each other

    wild ideas of philosphers entice those who like concrete data to see if they hold useful value

    i think it’s like science fiction and science - sure one is often a collage of various wild ideas - but some of them could inspire a person in a fancy lab coat to say “huh, that’s cool, i wonder if i could make that real” (that’s how we got mobile phones!)

    being a scientist can sometimes trap you into the world of concrete data that’s very detail orientated, scientists need their philosopher friends who just say wild shower thoughts without thinking too much about specifics. Small picture and big picture are not opposing forces after all, they complete each other

    edit: fixed a broken link

      • shneancy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        huh? how? why? i have never seen that article before in my life how did that happen? attempt two to post the right thing. huh this one worked i’m genuinely so deeply confused, i’ll update the original too. thank you for telling me!

    • Pulptastic
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      See, I knew philosophy was fiction.