The DM was a DM asking us to change our no tankies policy and remove the fuck tankies banner as it was apparently upsetting hexbear users. Apparently tankies view the word tankie as a form of slur. The admin wants us to ally as a form of “left solidarity”

    • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Here in the US, the people rule. Since socialist policies are in the interest of the people, they will want to vote for politicians who support socialist policies.

      • jack [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        63
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Here in the US, the people rule.

        This is literally objectively not true:

        https://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/princeton-experts-say-us-no-longer-democracy

        The US is not, and has never been, a democracy, because the people do not direct the actions of the government except on the margins. There is no democratic input on imperialism or capitalism. Those are invariate, and the system is designed to protect those from public influence.

        • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s crazy to see a far left news source be used to try to convince people that the US has never been a democracy.

          We have always been a democracy and we thankfully still are a democracy. We are in danger of losing our democracy to fascism however. If we don’t fix the flaws in our democratic institutions we will end up in a fascist dictatorship.

          I am well aware we are circling the fascist drain. I also know that the modern neoliberalism movement started by Regan and Thatcher is how we got here.

          • iie [they/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            1 year ago
            • 70% of Americans want singlepayer healthcare
            • 90% want universal background checks for firearm purchases
            • 75% want Citizen’s United repealed

            and yet these and other popular policies remain politically impossible

          • Grimble [he/him,they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Ok, you know things. Cool. So why are you being so dodgy about hyperspecific political tendencies? Why is such a precarious, controlled, center-left (by ur standard) system like the US worth balancing?

      • iie [they/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Study: Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens:

        From the abstract:

        Multivariate analysis indicates that economic elites and organized groups representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on U.S. government policy, while average citizens and mass-based interest groups have little or no independent influence.

        further down:

        In the United States, our findings indicate, the majority does not rule — at least not in the causal sense of actually determining policy outcomes. When a majority of citizens disagrees with economic elites and/or with organized interests, they generally lose. Moreover, because of the strong status quo bias built into the U.S. political system, even when fairly large majorities of Americans favor policy change, they generally do not get it.

        What is it, like, 70% of Americans want single payer healthcare?

      • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The people rule so effectively in the USA that the candidate with less votes has won 1/3 of presidential elections in the 21st century.

        How can you be a “democracy” if the candidate with the most votes loses the election? I thought that was the number one rule of democracy, the person with the most votes wins.