☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 month agoFree Thinkerlemmy.mlimagemessage-square76fedilinkarrow-up1199arrow-down133
arrow-up1166arrow-down1imageFree Thinkerlemmy.ml☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square76fedilink
minus-squaredavel [he/him]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·1 month agoName dropping a game theory hypothetical is not an argument.
minus-squarejoenforcerlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down12·1 month agoYou’re right, it’s not an argument. But it’s a perfectly sufficient reply to a one-word question that doesn’t properly provide an argument of its own.
minus-squareCowbee [he/they]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·1 month agoYour original comment only garnered a one word question because you were too vague.
minus-squarejoenforcerlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·1 month agoThe original comment that garnered a one word response wasn’t mine. Thanks though.
minus-squareCowbee [he/they]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 month agoThere was a vague “argument,” followed by a request for elaboration, followed by another somehow more vague “argument” from yourself.
Name dropping a game theory hypothetical is not an argument.
You’re right, it’s not an argument. But it’s a perfectly sufficient reply to a one-word question that doesn’t properly provide an argument of its own.
Your original comment only garnered a one word question because you were too vague.
The original comment that garnered a one word response wasn’t mine. Thanks though.
There was a vague “argument,” followed by a request for elaboration, followed by another somehow more vague “argument” from yourself.